Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Canelo Winning Will Cement Status as #1 P4P Best

[hitking]

Man, that means ****

The punc.hes of Canelo were hardest and cleanest with more quality

And he dropped Trout.

So according to your logic, it’s impossible to get a close decision over a guy that punches harder than you. Even if you outland him by a fairly significant margin.

[hitking]

Even your boy Dan Rafael over @ Espn called it a razor thin win for Canelo.... I think the knockdown gives the notion that Canelo dominated and made the scoring wider than it realyl was.

These newbie fight fans don’t know how to score fights. Most of them don’t even know how to watch fights. They judge fights based on Lamply’s organism and Lederman’s ******ed rhetoric.

[Mexican_Puppet]

So according to your logic, it’s impossible to get a close decision over a guy that punches harder than you. Even if you outland him by a fairly significant margin.

Its not the hard they your punch, is the quality and power of the punches.

Canelo landed better shots. Thats a reality he was very clean of his face and Trout did not

[hitking]

Its not the hard they your punch, is the quality and power of the punches.

Canelo landed better shots. Thats a reality he was very clean of his face and Trout did not

How did you score the fight?

[carloscruz10009]

Its not the hard they your punch, is the quality and power of the punches.

Canelo landed better shots. Thats a reality he was very clean of his face and Trout did not

So the face of the fighter determines who was landing the harder shots?

[carloscruz10009]

I'm not talking about Canelo said


Thats not truth.

GGG won that fight, close but he was the clean winner

I never said you were talking about Canelo.. i am showing you that your theory about punchtstats means nothing, cause even the person you are using for that theory disproves that same notion because he states that Golovkin lost to Jacobs who he outlanded by alot...

not sure if you get the symbolism.

[hitking]

So the face of the fighter determines who was landing the harder shots?

This guy is talking outta his ass. In one post, he says Canelo was better defensively. Then when you show him the punch stats, his argument switches to Canelo landed the better shots.

[Mexican_Puppet]

So the face of the fighter determines who was landing the harder shots?

A clean punch, a harder one, makes more damage than others.

[carloscruz10009]

This guy is talking outta his ass. In one post, he says Canelo was better defensively. Then when you show him the punch stats, his argument switches to Canelo landed the better shots.

Beat Trout.... but sure as hell i thought Lara beat him... he you cant admit that he has gotten the favorable decisions... then who is the really the Fanboy and or hater?

[Mexican_Puppet]

I never said you were talking about Canelo.. i am showing you that your theory about punchtstats means nothing, cause even the person you are using for that theory disproves that same notion because he states that Golovkin lost to Jacobs who he outlanded by alot...

not sure if you get the symbolism.

The symbolism?

What a ****** comment.

I don't care what Canelo said.

I use that lógic, not Canelo .

And Jacobs no way in hell won the fight against ggg