Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Lomachenko, Munguia-Hogan, Shields

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
    Leon Spinks fought Muhammed Ali when he was 7-0-1. Right after beating Camacho, Chavez at 82-0 and p4p #1 fought a guy who was 10-10. Roy Jones fought a guy who was 16-0 when he was p4p #1. When Whitaker was considered to be among the top Of the p4p list he fought a guy who was 7-4. Lastly, Floyd mayweather fought a guy with 0 pro fights in his final fight. Now keep telling me how nobody like lopez has ever fought someone like Loma when it comes to status, number of fights and p4p ranking. Any more weak excuses?? Oh, and as far as what lopez brings to the table that Loma should want? How about an actual credible opponent who fans would be excited for him to fight... One that isnt considered to be of a low skill level (like corolla, Martinez ) , Old/small (Rigo) , or inactive (Walters, Rigo). If I were to classify all of loma's opponents under the above... Only about 3 of his 14 opponents wouldn't fit 1 of those categories.
    See, you just can't answer a straight question.

    I asked when did a 12 fight prospect with no notable wins call out the P4P #1 and not get laughed at?

    You didn't answer that question, because you can't answer that question.

    Don't answer something else and pretend it is the same thing.

    So are you going to answer that, or not?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Lomasexual View Post
      See, you just can't answer a straight question.

      I asked when did a 12 fight prospect with no notable wins call out the P4P #1 and not get laughed at?

      You didn't answer that question, because you can't answer that question.

      Don't answer something else and pretend it is the same thing.

      So are you going to answer that, or not?
      I gave you examples of fighters who were lesser regarded than and considered less of a threat than what Lopez is now against fighters who were higher regarded than Loma, and you're still deflecting? Cut it out and take your loss. You love Loma to a fault (hence your ridiculous user name) and your excuses have been exposed as weak. Loma should man up because there isn't a better opponent option available to him right now.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
        I gave you examples of fighters who were lesser regarded than and considered less of a threat than what Lopez is now against fighters who were higher regarded than Loma, and you're still deflecting? Cut it out and take your loss. You love Loma to a fault (hence your ridiculous user name) and your excuses have been exposed as weak. Loma should man up because there isn't a better opponent option available to him right now.
        Answer the question.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Lomasexual View Post
          Answer the question.
          you're clearly out of material. I answered your question and did you one better by showing fighters who were greater than Loma facing fighters with inferior pro experience to lopez. So your entire argument has been exposed as nothing more than weak excuses. Good day.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
            you're clearly out of material. I answered your question and did you one better by showing fighters who were greater than Loma facing fighters with inferior pro experience to lopez. So your entire argument has been exposed as nothing more than weak excuses. Good day.
            You answered a different question to the one I asked. Do I need to repeat it?

            Just like when I asked what Lopez brings that Loma wants. You didn't answer that one either. You answered with what you imagined Loma should want. That's not what I asked.

            I'm not out of material.

            Just answer the damn questions. The questions I'm asking - not the questions you want to answer, not the ones you are pretending I am asking. The ones I am actually asking.

            I'm going to add a third one.

            3) Where is your integrity?

            Answer the damn questions.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Lomasexual View Post
              You answered a different question to the one I asked. Do I need to repeat it?

              Just like when I asked what Lopez brings that Loma wants. You didn't answer that one either. You answered with what you imagined Loma should want. That's not what I asked.

              I'm not out of material.

              Just answer the damn questions. The questions I'm asking - not the questions you want to answer, not the ones you are pretending I am asking. The ones I am actually asking.

              I'm going to add a third one.

              3) Where is your integrity?

              Answer the damn questions.
              I answered and exceeded anything you asked me. Loma. Should take the fight, you're making excuses as to why he shouldn't. You're embarrassing yourself.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                I answered and exceeded anything you asked me. Loma. Should take the fight, you're making excuses as to why he shouldn't. You're embarrassing yourself.
                Where is your self respect? To throw away your integrity so trivially.

                I'll repeat my question here.

                Take any #1 P4P fighter you want in the last 50 years then.

                How often do you think that a 12 fight prospect with zero notable achievement could call them out without being laughed at?

                You decided to answer a totally different question. Now, if I had of asked "Give me some examples of fighters that you think are better than Loma fighting opponents worse than Lopez" then yes, you would have answered it.

                If I wanted you to answer that question, I'd have asked that fucking question.

                Likewise you still haven't answered the question about what Lopez brings that Loma wants. Note - I didn't ask what you imagine Loma should want.

                If I wanted you to answer that question, I'd have asked that fucking question.

                Since you have run, run, run and run from the questions I now have only the one really meaningful one that I want an answer to instead.

                The last one - where is your damn integrity? What is it about hating Loma or fangirling Lopez that means you are willing to sacrifice your integrity so publicly?

                I mean, sure it is just a a boxing forum, but my personal integrity wouldn't allow me to run from questions like that - or to put myself in a position where such questions would have the power to make me run.

                Comment


                • #38
                  i love these mailbags!!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Bread is one of the best historian and analyst in boxing.

                    One of the best Daily Bread Mailbag that I learned diamond information and one I enjoyed to the fullest. Please, keep them coming.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Lomasexual View Post
                      Where is your self respect? To throw away your integrity so trivially.

                      I'll repeat my question here.

                      Take any #1 P4P fighter you want in the last 50 years then.

                      How often do you think that a 12 fight prospect with zero notable achievement could call them out without being laughed at?

                      You decided to answer a totally different question. Now, if I had of asked "Give me some examples of fighters that you think are better than Loma fighting opponents worse than Lopez" then yes, you would have answered it.

                      If I wanted you to answer that question, I'd have asked that fucking question.

                      Likewise you still haven't answered the question about what Lopez brings that Loma wants. Note - I didn't ask what you imagine Loma should want.

                      If I wanted you to answer that question, I'd have asked that fucking question.

                      Since you have run, run, run and run from the questions I now have only the one really meaningful one that I want an answer to instead.

                      The last one - where is your damn integrity? What is it about hating Loma or fangirling Lopez that means you are willing to sacrifice your integrity so publicly?

                      I mean, sure it is just a a boxing forum, but my personal integrity wouldn't allow me to run from questions like that - or to put myself in a position where such questions would have the power to make me run.
                      Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                      I answered and exceeded anything you asked me. Loma. Should take the fight, you're making excuses as to why he shouldn't. You're embarrassing yourself.
                      I am sorry, but I agree with Jab jab boom in this argument. You are expose big time Lomasexual and your nick said it all.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP