Comments Thread For: The Master of Efficiency, The Lomachenko Way

[j.razor]

This article just tells people how talanted this man is and what he has achieved. No words about invincibility, you are lyer, you are not huge fan of Loma otherwise you would not call the article which tells true to people just praising talant of one of the best boxers of our era the hype.

Lomachenko Demolishes Crolla in Four Round Mismatch

By Michael Rosenthal



This ^ is the right title. You just going with the lies the media pumps you with.

[BestPR]

Maywether may have been the best ever, but Loma is the best that ever was!!!

[eco1]

Loma just fought Crolla, a 100-1 mismatch, a real no hoper. Let's live in reality.

Let him beat Lopez and Davis and his hype will be justified. Going the Commey or the weak ass belt way, is not the way a real champ would go.

You have a pic of an imbecile who wants to fight Gamboa next. Maybe you should not be so biased.

P.S. you are more biased than my Bogner XTC 101B

[j.razor]

He's 30 already so very soon his hands will hurt and he won't be getting any kos. As good as lomo is he will have come and gone. At his peak he's as good as Pac and Floyd. But they were around longer

l0m0 is no where near T.B.E. or Manny.

[j.razor]

Yes, you should go back and read it again. Also you should feel lucky to live in such beautiful time to see and admire such a great boxer. Loma best ever!

There's only One T.B.E. & it AINT l0m0.

[j.razor]

Loma can beat these fighters simultaneously, any variable:
1. Loma vs. Tank and Lopez
2. Loma vs. Tank and Floyd
3. Loma vs. Lopez and Floyd

l0m0 can't even beat Devin Haney.

[MrShakeAndBake]

floyd was the best defensive boxer, Loma is both defensive and offensive boxer one of slickest boxer this generation... Not taking anything away from Roy.

[chrisJS]

I've always felt Lomachenko was a good boxer, he has talent IMO. I would be surprised if a genuine boxing forum with non trolls and real boxing fans held him to as much contempt and thought he was as bad as this place does. I was surprised so many felt Walters and Rigo would handle him easily but the same folks cried afterwards and give no credit.

He's the best boxer currently in the game that's pretty clear though I do feel Crawford is close enough to him. As far as best ever stuff? Only children, fanboys & those with total lack of history knowledge get emotional over that and use names like goat/tbe. Lomachenko is one of the more eye catching and talented fighters but it's going to be hard to build the type of resume to be worthy of a top 20/30 ranking. He can be the best of his era and IMO these days that's about it. Really difficult for modern guys to be greats when you've got guys like Greb that stepped into the ring vs. a hall of fame opponents more than 50 times. The game is too watered down, less talent the last 10-15 years than any point in history, too many politics and barely anyone becomes undisputed.

[champion4ever]

Loma did what he was supposed to do. He was fighting against an overmatched and limited opponent who stood very little chance of winning against him. That wasn't a tough or difficult match up wasn't it?

[champion4ever]

Loma did what he was supposed to do. He was in there with a limited and overmatched opponent who've seen his better years. So it wasn't difficult or tough match up wasn't it?