Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Loma KO'd a guy with SEVEN losses. Why exactly is that special?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Derranged View Post
    Anyone who gave Russell 6 rounds is ******ed.
    I don't know who gave him six rounds.

    If you're telling me you'd rather Loma remain a bum beater for the remainder of his career vs. rematch and get a definitive, decisive outcome against the one guy other than Salido to tarnish his record, I feel for you. That'd be a WAY better fight than anything in front of him right now besides Tank - and that ain't happening anytime soon.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by thecomedian2 View Post
      Holy Crap! you are comparing Marvelous Hagler with the likes of Lomachenko? The same dude that was beaten by Orlando "One dimensional" Salido? Jesus Christ get off the pipe you ******.
      Didn't you know Hagler lost to lesser fighters than Salido when he was coming through? And not in Hagler's second fight either...

      Actually i was talking about Crolla, not Loma and i was using Hagler as an example, not a comparison. I wasn't saying was anywhere near Hagler obviously. My point is that Crolla having 6 or 7 losses doesn't mean he is a bum. I was saying that some fighters have losses on their record from early on when they weren't padding their record.

      I was making a point that even supposed ATG's like Hagler lost fights on the way up, so it can happen to anybody and it doesn't mean they're a bum.

      Learn to read properly my friend, your mind is very simple if you cannot read in context and realise it was not a comparison, it was an example. You're the only ****** here, you cannot even read in context. You must have the reading age of a 9 year old.
      Last edited by EasternEuroFan; 04-13-2019, 04:30 PM.

      Comment


      • #33
        Marquez, Hopkins, Pac and Salido all had seven or more losses. Would it be a big deal to KO them? Yes.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by revelated View Post
          I don't know who gave him six rounds.

          If you're telling me you'd rather Loma remain a bum beater for the remainder of his career vs. rematch and get a definitive, decisive outcome against the one guy other than Salido to tarnish his record, I feel for you. That'd be a WAY better fight than anything in front of him right now besides Tank - and that ain't happening anytime soon.
          One of the judges gave him 6 rounds.

          Also, I want to see Loma fight the best. I was hoping for a Garcia fight, even though I think Loma would lose. He's a bigger threat than Lopez despite getting his arse kicked by Spence.

          Comment


          • #35
            It isn't! Loma was in there with a former overmatched, diminished champion, past his prime and on the decline. He had nothing to prove against beating up a washed up and shot fighter.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by EasternEuroFan View Post
              Didn't you know Hagler lost to lesser fighters than Salido when he was coming through? And not in Hagler's second fight either...

              Actually i was talking about Crolla, not Loma and i was using Hagler as an example, not a comparison. I wasn't saying was anywhere near Hagler obviously. My point is that Crolla having 6 or 7 losses doesn't mean he is a bum. I was saying that some fighters have losses on their record from early on when they weren't padding their record.

              I was making a point that even supposed ATG's like Hagler lost fights on the way up, so it can happen to anybody and it doesn't mean they're a bum.

              Learn to read properly my friend, your mind is very simple if you cannot read in context and realise it was not a comparison, it was an example. You're the only ****** here, you cannot even read in context. You must have the reading age of a 9 year old.
              Damn. Hahaha.

              Comment


              • #37
                Fact remains that Crolla is a former world title-holder, and is universally regarded as a current top-10 ranked Lightweight (TBRB #7; Ring #5) so it's a pretty decent victory for Lomachenko. Crolla was a mandatory and everybody knows that he was supposed to fight Commey before his injury. Loma should be getting no hate whatsoever for dispatching Crolla within 4 rounds. He did what he had to.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post
                  6 losses at the time.

                  And I see you neglected to confirm him as a former world champion who went 24 rounds with Linares.

                  The way he dominated and despatched him was special.

                  It doesn't matter that the opponent wasn't elite. He was a world level fighter.
                  Keep that same energy the next time you see or hear someone call my boy Swift a cherry picker

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    And Crawford now wants to KO a guy with 5 losses who got blown out by a bum in 1 rd.

                    Let Gary Russell fight Tank

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Tony Trick-Pony View Post
                      Marquez, Hopkins, Pac and Salido all had seven or more losses. Would it be a big deal to KO them? Yes.
                      Yet "TILL THIS DAY!!"...people call Marquez's KO of Manny a lucky punch, Manny was off balance, he tripped, etc.

                      Originally posted by £-4-£ View Post
                      Crolla was a mandatory
                      Yet Crawford got flack for facing Horn when he was the mandatory.

                      See, nothing but hypocrisy around here.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP