Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Loma KO'd a guy with SEVEN losses. Why exactly is that special?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Theodore View Post
    Homie, it makes you look ridiculous, when you're trashing one of the best in the sport and big upping Amir Khan in other threads.

    BTW, you're Wazaa aren't you?
    To your first comment, Amir Khan has fought more quality opposition three times over than Lomachenko. And I say that as a person who has talked to Lomachenko back when he was early. He was a nice, humble guy. Now, the networks and people like you guys are hyping him and getting him a big head despite him really not having done anything significant yet besides making Rigo quit.

    I'm a fan of him as a fighter. I'm not a fan of overrating certain wins. Especially when other fighters do the same thing and get criticized for fighting bums. Threads talking about him beating a prime Manny - why? Because of a Crolla KO? Seriously? The Manny Pacquiao that dominated Morales in the rematches puts Loma in the hospital, bar none.

    AS to your second question, the only "wazaa" I'm aware of is this:



    IN which case, no, that's not me receiving Trish's face into my crotch. Unfortunately.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
      It’s based upon his volume of work in a short period of time. Where does all the Tank Davis hype come from? All the Teofomo López hype? Talk about flash over substance, who have they beat?
      Body of work? So we're saying that Wanheng Menyaothin should be hyped based on his "volume of work in a short period of time" too? Is that it? Because he's at the same pace as Loma and frankly, the same level of opposition with one exception overall. So are we hyping him too?

      Or is this really about the mythical "eye test" that got Choco KTFO?

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by revelated View Post
        Come on man. I shouldn't have to do this for you.

        A problem for Tank Davis - EL_GRINGO

        Lomachenko vs Prime Pacquiao - TS isn't too bad, but Madison boxing, really?

        Only 1 style can beat lomachenko's assault - qOcOp saying Rigo beats Floyd

        Should Lomachenko change is middle name to VASYL 1 PUNCH KO LOMACHENKO

        loma has no [power doe!!

        All based on knocking out a pie who wasn't throwing back.
        I didn't make a big deal about this, my thread wasn't even about this fight or his performance, if you read what my question was to other posters, i will write it here again so read it carefully please.

        When Lomachenko has become undisputed which is a big possibility,
        it will mean he has all four belts,
        given that Ellerbe and Floyd have stated repeatedly they have other plans then fighting Lomachenko,
        what are they planning to do when Tank outgrows 130 and moves up to 135?
        If he ain't gonna fight Loma he ain't fighting for no belts since Loma in the scenario i described will have all four belts, it won't look good.


        as you see my post has nothing to do with the fight from last night, it's about what will happen in the future between Lomachenko and Tank Davis given what team Davis have stated multiple times

        Comment


        • #24
          Loma is one dude in boxing who I believe would fight anyone at his weight class no questions asked, no whining about money or A side B side Bull ****.

          He's already fought better fighters than most dudes with 30 fights in the game.

          Unfortunately, the buisness of boxing always prevents the best fights from happening.

          He's got 2 great fights for him in Mikey and Tank and we all know neither will happen anytime soon thanks to hard feelings and Mayweather not wanting Tank taking that fight.

          Sadly it looks like Lomachenko won't ever have that huge career defining scrap.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by EasternEuroFan View Post
            Yeah he lost some fights on the way up, so did Marvin Hagler, losses can happen when you're not padding your record when you're coming through the ranks.
            Holy Crap! you are comparing Marvelous Hagler with the likes of Lomachenko? The same dude that was beaten by Orlando "One dimensional" Salido? Jesus Christ get off the pipe you ******.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by revelated View Post
              A split decision is never a dominant win. Russell gave him a fight in both guys' primes. Nobody else has.
              Anyone who gave Russell 6 rounds is ******ed.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Derranged View Post
                At a Gary Russell Jr. rematch.. Talk about nothing special, rematching someone you already dominated just because the loser made up a story about being over-trained...
                Yet ***** Ass Divas like you complained about SALIDO rematch?

                Comment


                • #28
                  where are all the idiots who said loma would lose to rigo

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    its not special, its loma ^^

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by thecomedian2 View Post
                      Yet ***** Ass Divas like you complained about SALIDO rematch?
                      What in God's name are you babbling about?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP