Crawford CANNOT be considered P4P anything if Khan takes him the distance.

[blue_dolphin]

With this logic spence is overrated for not stopping a midget that moved up two divisions

[Combat Talk Radio]

I'm going to bump this thread up homey when bumass Khan gets KTFO. Khan ain't taking Crawford the distance.

I don't know what's going to happen, and neither do you. All I said was, Crawford can't be P4P if Khan lasts in there, given Danny got him out of there in 4. Let's be consistent. IF Khan's a bum, yet Crawford can't get rid of a "damaged" Khan as fast or faster than Danny Garcia did, how can Crawford be P4P? It doesn't make sense.


But you seem rather confident - so why don't we do this.

If Khan sees the 10th round, you're outta here. No more. Relinquish - submit - QUIT!!!...BoxingScene and don't come back.

I mean you're 100% confident Khan's a bum so it should be easy work, right? I mean Crawford only took 9 rounds to take out Middleweight Jeff Horn, surely he can get "chinny" Amir Khan out in less than that, right?

[Theodore]

I don't know what's going to happen, and neither do you. All I said was, Crawford can't be P4P if Khan lasts in there, given Danny got him out of there in 4. Let's be consistent. IF Khan's a bum, yet Crawford can't get rid of a "damaged" Khan as fast or faster than Danny Garcia did, how can Crawford be P4P? It doesn't make sense.


But you seem rather confident - so why don't we do this.

If Khan sees the 10th round, you're outta here. No more. Relinquish - submit - QUIT!!!...BoxingScene and don't come back.

I mean you're 100% confident Khan's a bum so it should be easy work, right? I mean Crawford only took 9 rounds to take out Middleweight Jeff Horn, surely he can get "chinny" Amir Khan out in less than that, right?

And what about you? IF you lose? This bet can't be one sided, where I take all the risks and you take none.

I'm down are you? I don't live my life on the internet with multiple aliases and accounts. And yes, I do think you are Wazaa, but that's a different topic.

And why before the 10th? Why an arbitrary line? If Crawford knocks out Khan at anytime of the fight I'm down for the bet. But if you lose, you delete your account and don't come back.

Step up punk.

[Derranged]

Why is Loma considered P4P anything for going life and death with Pedraza for 12 rounds? Khan in his best days was much better than Pedraza or Linares, a lot better. Not a Khan fan here, by the way.

Your posts about Loma are getting dumber by the day.

[Derranged]

I would be very surprised if this went the distance.

[Theodore]

Your posts about Loma are getting dumber by the day.

1 of the reasons why I hardly post in NSB, there's ****** and then there's ******ed.

[Combat Talk Radio]

And what about you? IF you lose? This bet can't be one sided, where I take all the risks and you take none.

I'm down are you? I don't live my life on the internet with multiple aliases and accounts. And yes, I do think you are Wazaa, but that's a different topic.

And why before the 10th? Why an arbitrary line? If Crawford knocks out Khan at anytime of the fight I'm down for the bet. But if you lose, you delete your account and don't come back.

Step up punk.

10th starts the so-called "championship rounds" - meaning, if you've lasted that long with an alleged glass jaw, you can't be a bum and you belong in that ring.

Going for a KO bet's too easy. It needs to be high stakes or it isn't worth it. Nope...Khan sees the 10th, you're out of here.

For me? I'm not confident either way, I just said he can't be P4P if Khan takes him the distance.

But I'll tell you what.

If Crawford has outboxed Khan for however long it does last, I'll leave. Outboxed is defined as winning ALL FOUR of the key criteria for scoring a fight. Crawford's got to be defensively and offensively perfect, he has to walk Khan down and he has to pretty much clearly dominate. No ref help. If he's on the backfoot at any point, that doesn't count. ALL. FOUR. CRITERIA.

So basically, if Crawford does to Khan what Spence did to Mikey, and he can sustain that for every round of however long the fight lasts...I'll pack it in. But he can't lose a single round to Khan. Not one.

See, that's high stakes.

Are you game? Or are you yellow?

[Theodore]

10th starts the so-called "championship rounds" - meaning, if you've lasted that long with an alleged glass jaw, you can't be a bum and you belong in that ring.

Going for a KO bet's too easy. It needs to be high stakes or it isn't worth it. Nope...Khan sees the 10th, you're out of here.

For me? I'm not confident either way, I just said he can't be P4P if Khan takes him the distance.

But I'll tell you what.

If Crawford has outboxed Khan for however long it does last, I'll leave. Outboxed is defined as winning ALL FOUR of the key criteria for scoring a fight. Crawford's got to be defensively and offensively perfect, he has to walk Khan down and he has to pretty much clearly dominate. No ref help. If he's on the backfoot at any point, that doesn't count. ALL. FOUR. CRITERIA.

So basically, if Crawford does to Khan what Spence did to Mikey, and he can sustain that for every round of however long the fight lasts...I'll pack it in. But he can't lose a single round to Khan. Not one.

See, that's high stakes.

Are you game? Or are you yellow?

Seems to me you ain't confident at all. You even said so yourself. So I guess as a Khan nuthugger, you put in all these criteria and stipulations. I'll keep it simple, a knockout, TKO, throw in the towel at any point, I win, while if Crawford goes the distance I lose.


The stakes are high enough that one of us deletes our account and leaves, this place forever, although with you I doubt it.

That's it just simple rules.

No need for all these complications about championship rounds, Crawford walking down Khan, Crawford can't fight on the backfoot, Crawford can't win 1 round, etc.

Just a straight up bet, where if Crawford KTFO of Khan or his corner throws in the towel I win, if Crawford goes the distance with Khan you win.

Seems like your scared, that's why you have all these stipulations and criteria. Mine is if Crawford KTFO of Khan one bettor wins, if he doesn't the other bettor loses.

Just a straight up bet without any arbitrary lines and stipulations.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Seems to me you ain't confident at all. You even said so yourself. So I guess as a Khan nuthugger, you put in all these criteria and stipulations. I'll keep it simple, a knockout, TKO, throw in the towel at any point, I win, while if Crawford goes the distance I lose.


The stakes are high enough that one of us deletes our account and leaves, this place forever, although with you I doubt it.

That's it just simple rules.

No need for all these complications about championship rounds, Crawford walking down Khan, Crawford can't fight on the backfoot, Crawford can't win 1 round, etc.

Just a straight up bet, where if Crawford KTFO of Khan or his corner throws in the towel I win, if Crawford goes the distance with Khan you win.

Seems like your scared, that's why you have all these stipulations and criteria. Mine is if Crawford KTFO of Khan one bettor wins, if he doesn't the other bettor loses.

Just a straight up bet without any arbitrary lines and stipulations.

You're wanting to bet on confident outcomes. I want to bet on unlikely outcomes. That way, it proves something.

If Crawford KO's Khan after 11 rounds of getting outboxed what's that prove? Not a damn thing. Except that he's not P4P and he got exposed. Same as what happened with Wilder.

Your gut tells you Khan gets starched. Fine. But that's a pointless bet because it's what everyone expects. Real men bet on the unexpected. It's like Russian roulette.

The unexpected is that Khan goes the distance - and I'm being fair, I'm saying 10 rounds. Doesn't matter the outcome beyond that. As long as he hits 10, you take the L.

If you're SO confident Crawford KO's him before 10, what do you have to lose?

[Theodore]

You're wanting to bet on confident outcomes. I want to bet on unlikely outcomes. That way, it proves something.

If Crawford KO's Khan after 11 rounds of getting outboxed what's that prove? Not a damn thing. Except that he's not P4P and he got exposed. Same as what happened with Wilder.

Your gut tells you Khan gets starched. Fine. But that's a pointless bet because it's what everyone expects. Real men bet on the unexpected. It's like Russian roulette.

The unexpected is that Khan goes the distance - and I'm being fair, I'm saying 10 rounds. Doesn't matter the outcome beyond that. As long as he hits 10, you take the L.

If you're SO confident Crawford KO's him before 10, what do you have to lose?

Hahahahaha, the parameters you set up in this bet is a fools deal.

If you ain't confident like you said in a prior post, why challenge me with the bet and then have all these stipulations?

I get it, as a Khan fanboy, you got pissed because people rate him as garbage even when he was at his peak, you make up all these threads trashing Crawford, Loma, etc. Face it homey, Khan ain't shyt and neither are his fans.

Like I said, just a simple straight up bet. Khan gets KTFO, I win, he goes the distance I lose. That's it, none of this bullshyt about Crawford can't fight on the backfoot, has to win on all the judges scorecards of every round (as if a judge will give a fighter every round even if he wins), can only fight in a certain style, can only knockout the guy in x amount of rounds, etc.

If you ain't confident in the first place, as you stated, then don't challenge people with bets that has all these stipulations and conditions.

NSB for years has gone down the drain with assclowns like you making up ****** ass threads like this.