Comments Thread For: Whyte Waiting on WBC To Make Decision on His Title Shot

[DougalDylan]

Were you outraged when Povetkin vs David Price was the final eliminator for the WBA Super Championship last year?

Or is Breazele vs Molina the only “mismatch” final eliminator that gets your blood boiling?

Pulev/Whyte would have been a decent final eliminator, but we got stuck with Pulev/H Fury. Because Whyte has you guys thinking Helinus and Browne are the type of wins that get you a title shot.

It's not the mismatch eliminator it's the fact it's a mismatch eliminator its the fact they upgraded it after the fight.

When Pulev dropped out of the AJ fight Hearn had to go down the list offering it to everyone in turn till they hit Takam, the WBC should have done the same once they upgraded Stiverene. Why would this be a bad thing ?

Also they took loads of money off Whyte (sanctioning fees) who had every right to expect a final eliminator when they had already given his slot away , if at least they had been honest Whyte could have saved himself some money dumped the WBC.

[Nusky]

Another UK coward crying and b---hing about the same s---.

[Boksfan]

Stop waiting and fight Ortiz already. Man up!

[Clegg]

He can't be too optimistic if he's calling out Charr.

[juggernaut666]

Whyte declined and ran from his title shot....

That would be Joshua.


That should be end thread..............


On Whyte? He was ranked 3rd and Breazeale was 6th when Breazeale defeated Molina who took Stivernes place and that WAS a final eliminator match.

The guy at fault here IS Wilder ,who dragged this out and could have fought Breazeale before Fury ,he had PLENTY of time to. so don't hate the player ,hate the game when they ordered Fury to fight wilder which actually didn't make sense. lol


whyte needs to stop crying,he also has the silver belt which means in the WBC rules he needs to fight a FINAL eliminator himself, why do ppl , make there own rules up on here ?

[PotentialToast]

Were you outraged when Povetkin vs David Price was the final eliminator for the WBA Super Championship last year?

It wasn't a final eliminator. Povetkin was already mamdatory but it wasn't due.

[PotentialToast]

I think sometimes Dillian gets in his own way. Why doesn't he fight his title eliminators man? He bypassed two of them within the same calendar year of 2018; First against Luis Ortiz and then with Kubrat Pulev.

I hope that the WBC does make him Deontay Wilder's mandatory challenger so "The Bronze Bomber" could shut him up. If there's no Klitschko I hope Wilder fights him next.

Ortiz wasn't a final eliminator. Pulev paid him a few 000,000$ not the megabucks the Parker fight made.

[PotentialToast]

Hearn will be put in a real awkward position with Whyte if that's how it unfolds.

If I would offer the winner of Whyte v Wilder 50%, but Wilder 30% if he wants to fight first and avoid Whyte. Sort out Wilder's bull**** as there is no way he will forego an AJ pay day if his next fight is Whyte.

[DougalDylan]

It wasn't a final eliminator when Brezeale fought it Suilman admitted that it was an eliminator. They changed it later around all that shady court action because of Wilder leading a mob to get Brezeales wife and kids.

Molina was ranked 14th so how did that beat Whyte at 6th .

Whyte declined and ran from his title shot....

That would be Joshua.


That should be end thread..............


On Whyte? He was ranked 3rd and Breazeale was 6th when Breazeale defeated Molina who took Stivernes place and that WAS a final eliminator match.

The guy at fault here IS Wilder ,who dragged this out and could have fought Breazeale before Fury ,he had PLENTY of time to. so don't hate the player ,hate the game when they ordered Fury to fight wilder which actually didn't make sense. lol


whyte needs to stop crying,he also has the silver belt which means in the WBC rules he needs to fight a FINAL eliminator himself, why do ppl , make there own rules up on here ?

[4truth]

Fight Ortiz and stfu!