Comments Thread For: Jermall Charlo-Brandon Adams on 6/15 or 6/8, on Showtime
Collapse
-
-
No one is arguing that Jermall Charlo is the best middleweight in boxing, or that (sans Ray Robinson and Marvelous Hagler) Jermall Charlo whoops every middleweight fighter to ever put on gloves, or that Jermall Charlo whoops every fighter 154-168, or the rest of the bull**** that folks like you were on here using while Golovkin chased his payday.
Jermall Charlo is a good fighter, who's still building his run, who rightly feels like he's the best but who's performance so far (particularly the Korobov fight) shows that there's still room to grow.
Context is a beautiful thing
and why do you care what fanboys say? i've seen people on here say charlo is the best middleweight and would ko canelo and ggg. that doesnt change his resume one way or the other just like it didnt for ggg. why not treat every fighter equally instead of having baby gloves for charlo and pretending like ggg was a bum basher when he was clearly more accomplished?Comment
-
Nice, yeah I would like that fight too. That actually would probably be the best option for GGG as a tune-up if Canelo is next in September. N'dam should be durable and give GGG some rounds. And honestly not a bad fight for N'dam.
If GGG is still what he was or close to it he should roll through N'dam. But if he is slipping it is a good chance for N'dam to have a real breakthrough.
That dude goes down more than Ellerbe on Floyd Jr.Comment
-
Lol. Durable in context I suppose. I consider him a better bet to be able to give GGG more rounds than Adams or that other guy I have never heard of.
N'dam only stopped once and he was in there with Stevens, Lemieux, Murata (2), Quillin, Khurtside, Murray. Much better opposition than the other 2 guys I've heard rumored for GGG and N'dam was basically as good as all of those guys I mentioned. But at 35 he probably isn't what he was either.
I think N'dam and GGG were supposed to fight a while ago actually and I think N'dam vacated though but maybe the circumstances would be different now and he would want that fight.Comment
-
Nice, yeah I would like that fight too. That actually would probably be the best option for GGG as a tune-up if Canelo is next in September. N'dam should be durable and give GGG some rounds. And honestly not a bad fight for N'dam.
If GGG is still what he was or close to it he should roll through N'dam. But if he is slipping it is a good chance for N'dam to have a real breakthrough.
That's at least good sparring lolComment
-
Lol yes exactly. If you're going to take a tune-up you may as well pick someone who could possibly give you some rounds. Otherwise why bother.Comment
-
-
wbc trying to force ggg into a fight is one thing(it failed by the way), but the wbc trying to force canelo into anything again? , good luck with that... if needed canelo will fight andrade first and then once undisputed he will dump the belts before a ggg fight, by doing that not only he will deny ggg a chance to all the titles but he will also avoid anobody dictating who is he going to fight next ... but none of this will be needed, canelo-ggg is happening in sept...
If Canelo gives up the belt, then he gives up the belt; the WBC isn't dead without Canelo, and there's no doubt in my mind that they will have him in position to get a WBC shot again whenever he's ready.
Canelo can fight whomever he wants; as long as he beats Jacobs, his September fight simply won't have the WBC belt attached to itComment
-
We were all lead to believe initially GGG-Adams was happening and instead it's Charlo-Adams. Makes sense that an article like this would generate a lot of buzz. Especially considering the backlash GGG was getting from a lot of people for taking on Adams. (I personally like GGG but thought that was a sh.it fight.)Comment
Comment