Originally posted by Mirror Universe
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are there any posters on here willing to admit they had Wilder wrong?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Mirror Universe View PostJoshua already has a fight scheduled, so Wilder has to take care of his mandatory regardless. Even if he's intrigued by the two fight deal, it'd be canceled if he loses to Breazeale regardless. If he thinks he'll be worth more if he beats Breazeale, good for him.Nothing stops a Joshua fight after that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostIf PPV generates more than DAZN is willing to pay up front, then why don't they commit it?
Hearn doesn't want the fight in the US. DAZN was able to pressure him into agreeing that one fight would be in the US if Wilder signed a lengthy deal, but Hearn has never been willing to just do the fight in the country that makes the fighters the most money and on the platform that makes the fighters the most money.
This should be so simple. Go to Vegas and put the fight on PPV. Everyone makes a bajillion dollars. Mutual rematch clause. Put the rematch where it'll make the most money and on the platform that will make the most money. Everyone makes a bajillion dollars.
Which side is stopping that scenario from taking place? Not Wilder's side.
Comment
-
Originally posted by icha View Postniether fighter is a ppv atraction in the us... good luck with sho offering similar amounts to wilder for ppv fights.. i dont even think they can put him on ppv without joshua or fury without losing money...
Everyone involved, on both sides, believes the fight would do over 1 million US PPV buys. The problem is that Hearn is trying to please DAZN by blocking the fight from being on PPV, where clearly the most money would be made.
Comment
-
I had him exactly right, I never thought he wanted that fight over the last 18 months. I thought both teams would mind marinating the fight, the fact that he cried about being ducked is laughable then and now ridiculous to the open eyes. I knew he didn’t want that fight then, but it helps to use Joshua name to help propel his. He knows as long as he has that belt which Joshua desperately wanted the price would keep going up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray* View PostI had him exactly right, I never thought he wanted that fight over the last 18 months.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mirror Universe View PostWilder just did over 325k in his PPV debut, at $75, against an opponent that was barely known in the US before the fight was signed. Wilder is clearly a PPV attraction now.
Everyone involved, on both sides, believes the fight would do over 1 million US PPV buys. The problem is that Hearn is trying to please DAZN by blocking the fight from being on PPV, where clearly the most money would be made.
(2) Joshua is NOT signed to DAZN, he can fight on showtime or ESPN. It’s all about money to Hearn, he made that plain ness in a recent interview. So all these “Hearn is trying to please DAZN” is BS. He made it clear that the fight can go to showtime PPV.
(3) The fans are the ones losing out, even on PPV both fighters aren’t going to earn more than what’s on the table right now from DAZN.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray* View Post(1) The fact that Fury is british help sold that fight, Wilder is barely known too. Is his next fight against Breazeale on PPV?
(2) Joshua is NOT signed to DAZN, he can fight on showtime or ESPN. It’s all about money to Hearn, he made that plain ness in a recent interview.
(3) The fans are the ones losing out, even on PPV both fighters aren’t going to earn more than what’s on the table right now from DAZN.
Making the fight isn't complicated. Put the fight where it makes the most money. Air it on the platform paying the most money. Do a rematch. Also where it makes the most on what makes the most. No strings attached beyond that. 60/40 AJ in fight one. 60/40 Wilder in fight two if he wins the first and 70/30 AJ if AJ wins the first.
That's an offer that would get the deal done. But Hearn has no incentive to do that deal. Hearn has to please DAZN regardless of what's best for AJ.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mirror Universe View PostThey were willing to. Joshua asked for 50 million and they said no problem.
Hearn doesn't want the fight in the US. DAZN was able to pressure him into agreeing that one fight would be in the US if Wilder signed a lengthy deal, but Hearn has never been willing to just do the fight in the country that makes the fighters the most money and on the platform that makes the fighters the most money.
This should be so simple. Go to Vegas and put the fight on PPV. Everyone makes a bajillion dollars. Mutual rematch clause. Put the rematch where it'll make the most money and on the platform that will make the most money. Everyone makes a bajillion dollars.
Which side is stopping that scenario from taking place? Not Wilder's side.
They said:
- We won't tell you the terms
- You must publicly accept
- It wouldn't be productive to have a meeting
- We will own the promotion
Funnily enough some of the things they are now accusing them of doing.
Hilarious to see you wilder fanboys backtrack on this stuff.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mirror Universe View PostHe was desperate enough to accept 15 flat. He clearly wanted the fight. Now he's holding out for 50/50. If you want to call that a duck, go ahead. I'm sure we agree he's not worth 50/50 right now. But to say he never wanted the fight is inaccurate. He clearly wanted it.
Comment
Comment