Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Jacobs Believes His Opinion That GGG Won Has Offended Canelo

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Jacobs Believes His Opinion That GGG Won Has Offended Canelo

    IBF middleweight world champion Daniel Jacobs believes his recent statements, explaining that Gennady Golovkin should have been the rightful victor in both bouts with Canelo Alvarez, have offended the Mexican superstar. Jacobs will stake his belt against Canelo, who holds the WBC, WBA middleweight belts, on May 4th at the T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas.
    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Rozier said Canelo and Jacobs were his two favorite fighters... but called cheaters a piece of shet in his “book.” Therefore, we know Rozier knew that Canelo’s picograms were from contamination of supplements or meat. Same thing. As long as Rozier said it himself they were his two favorite fighters

    Comment


    • #3
      I never understood how a person can score a fight and get a Split decision.

      Jacobs isn't as smart as he sounds.

      Comment


      • #4
        Jacobs you big dummy! GGG took zero damage from you but hasn’t recovered from the beating he received from a guy you say he actually beat? How does that make any sense?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Frankie2Jabs View Post
          Rozier said Canelo and Jacobs were his two favorite fighters... but called cheaters a piece of shet in his “book.” Therefore, we know Rozier knew that Canelo’s picograms were from contamination of supplements or meat. Same thing. As long as Rozier said it himself they were his two favorite fighters
          Picograms & back acne are tools used to KO strong opponents!

          Comment


          • #6
            There are always a few NutJobs that disagree

            Comment


            • #7
              Jacobs is a hypocritical fool. The man did not even come close to beating GGG. He made a big fuss about fighting him, dragged the negotiations until he got the money he wanted cause GGG title was about to stripped from him, then he comes to the ring at light heavyweight. He allegedly used some kind of peds himself. Not only that, but he got droped and back pedaled the way Canelo did in the first fight. I’m looking forward to seeing that arrogant clown get beat decisively by Canelo. I did get blocked by him on Instagram for taking up his debate challenge by lighting his ass up with facts.

              Comment


              • #8
                Duh lol Canelo isn't going to agree with you that GGG beat him, how do you expect him to feel lol

                It would be weird for him to be perfectly okay with you saying that lol what you said wasn't exactly a compliment lol

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Letmaku View Post
                  Picograms & back acne are tools used to KO strong opponents!
                  Lol.

                  It’s all about context. If Canelo or a fighter has nanograms or picorgrams from a post fight urine and blood test then that’s at least something to believe a fighter fought in the ring with something as those cyclists like Contador or Armstrong whose legacy faults were all based on in competition usage. Many people don’t even know that Contador’a results were based during the days he was cycling with picorgrams, so WADA was trying to figure out how he had molecular Traces during the days of cycling...

                  Canelo’s fight was cancelled because he had Traces 80 days away. I think it was all a cover up to delay the fight and get the knee surgery. A poor way to get out of a fight. It just doesn’t make any sense.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Snowballer View Post
                    I never understood how a person can score a fight and get a Split decision.

                    Jacobs isn't as smart as he sounds.
                    good catch

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP