Comments Thread For: Fighter of The Decade? Mayweather, Ward Top List of Candidates

[Lomasexual]

When did this happen?

November 19, 2016.

[Jedi Vader]

November 19, 2016.

Show me links to this Kovalev victory.

[RespekonMyName]

It's impressive you could type that - and without typos! considering my spunks had sealed your eyes shut.

Drop the ***** stuff. You must be a Pac fan.

[Lomasexual]

Show me links to this Kovalev victory.

I don't have any links to the fight. I have a copy saved locally.

You'll have to find your own link to the fight, or someone might be able to provide you with one.

[RespekonMyName]

I don't have any links to the fight. I have a copy saved locally.

You'll have to find your own link to the fight, or someone might be able to provide you with one.

Kov lost. Close, but he gassed out.

[Lomasexual]

Kov lost.

Only on paper.

The boxing world agreed. Kovalev won.

We shouldn't accept corrupt or incompetent decisions. Not if we actually like the sport.

[pasawayako]

Pac is the undisputed 2000-2009 FOTD.
Todays decade is very weak and don't have a single boxer worthy to be the 2010-2019 FOTD.

[Letmaku]

This is the decade of cherry picking, weight cheating and drug cheating! Zero is the most important number! And boxing is the most lucrative business in the world!

[Letmaku]

Pac is the undisputed 2000-2009 FOTD.
Todays decade is very weak and don't have a single boxer worthy to be the 2010-2019 FOTD.

If Pacman beat Spence & Crawford in 2019 he can be FOTD again! 🦁

[The D3vil]

Damn, this is a hard one.

More than anything, this just goes to show you how f**cked up boxing is as a sport.

In my opinion, GGG should be the winner, as he was the most dominant fighter of the decade, but you can't give it to him because he was a high-risk/low-reward fighter that money fighters wanted no part of until he got old, then he got d**cked out of 2 victories against Canelo.

Mayweather plotted and picked his opponents carefully, even though a lot of them were great at some point, but he's got the best resume even though he only fought half the decade, which just goes to show you how much boxers are ducking each other these days.

Canelo probably WILL win the award based on his impressive resume. The only problem is that he easily could have lost 4 of the fights in the decade. The fact that he could win in spite of the fact that most people think he loses the fights that he wins is horrible for the sport.

Andre Ward didn't fight enough and his biggest win is one that again most people don't believe he won.

Lomachenko came around to late in the decade, lost a fight (albeit a close and controversial one).

I don't know man, I might just give it to Crawford because he won every fight and there was no doubt that he won every fight, even though he didn't fight any P4P level talent, but I'm just so sick of this f***cking sport robbing us of great fights and then when we get great fights there's always controversy because of the paid off/incompetent judges.

Hell, look at somebody like Manny Pacquiao. He was blatantly robbed against Timothy Bradley and probably against Jeff Horn. If he doesn't lose those fights, he possibly wins this award, even with losses to Mayweather and Marquez.