Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fury don't owe wilder nothing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • excuses excuses

    now that fury has delayed a wilder rematch, its "he doesn't need to rematch him anyway". fanboyism at its finest

    and was that really a robbery?

    wilder needs 3 rounds outside the KD rounds to make it a draw

    there were some close rounds

    i wouldnt call it a robbery although i havent watched it back

    Comment


    • Wilder whopped his ass, he even dropped him, there is no way Fury won, end of discussion

      Comment


      • Originally posted by R_Walken View Post
        I’m sure when you watched the fight, d****d in the Union Jack that you were Viewing through non biased eyes And scored it fair

        But I somehow seriously doubt it , the way you swing off AJs nuts non stop and even though you wrote off Fury and Wilder / Fury before it happend . Fury gave a great performance and won according to most people . You now conveniently swing off his nuts also

        If a Uk d.ick rider such as you gave Wilder 3 rounds, It probably means he won at least 5
        I dònt even like fury and ive been one of his strongest critics but the bottom line is wilder failed to win more that 3 rounds and almost every expert had fury winning except you.
        Now dosser heavyweight can go back and face off with big titty breazeale and make his 2 million lol
        Again wilder , winkle will have to play with chump change while the king of the division makes his 28 million and sending chuuby checker miller into a big heap in MSG.
        Fury makes his big money on espn and wilder will have to come to him now.
        Wilder has rightly been put back down the pecking order and gained his rightfull place as a dosser.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by The plunger man View Post
          almost every expert had fury winning except you
          That's a lie. AP, ESPN, Yahoo, LA Times, Sporting News, Washington Post, etc all had a draw or Wilder winning.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
            That's a lie. AP, ESPN, Yahoo, LA Times, Sporting News, Washington Post, etc all had a draw or Wilder winning.
            almost dummy

            Comment


            • Wilder can always go back to the way it was before. The question is will Espinoza be able to pay the kind of money Wilder wants for the Breazeale fight, for example, even if it meant not making a profit?

              Comment


              • Lmao fury made a business decision stop it man, boxing fans wanted the fight, business does not benefit the fan. Stop it boxing fans deserve the best fights. It was a draw, run it back

                Comment


                • This is a correct statement. Tyson Fury also has positioned himself to never again have to be the away fighter or "the opponent" for no man. These fanboys can't get that through their heads. They don't understand. Their man is supposed to have all the chips stacked in his favour, and anything else is "ducking" apparently. Wilder was already offered a deal on ESPN and he turned it down outright. Fury has gone on record saying he will never fight on Showtime again after the robbery in the first fight. No sane person with a little boxing knowledge can say that first fight was a draw.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by W1LL View Post
                    No sane person with a little boxing knowledge can say that first fight was a draw.
                    AP, ESPN, Yahoo, LA Times, Sporting News, Washington Post, etc all had a draw or Wilder winning.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                      AP, ESPN, Yahoo, LA Times, Sporting News, Washington Post, etc all had a draw or Wilder winning.
                      I thought you left the forum?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP