Tweet
Sorry about the Novel
I want the Wilder /Fury rematch to happen like everyone else. Even if the offer is tremendous as Arum will have you believe . unless it’s absolutely insane $ and off the charts ****** . Can anyone even give a decent reason or think a reason as to why they expect or think Wilder should or would take a offer from ESPN and have him and
His team give up control of a possible rematch
allowing Top Rank to controll the fight have all the advantages they can try and get for Fury. Top Rank would be in charge of location ( UK ? ) picking the judges , Date , commentators and probably more and allow Top Rank to be the promoter and Espn the channel to be the ones who would be the ones to profit from a rematch.
I think Wilder is now the sports longest reigning World Champ and holds the most prestigious of the 4 straps and by the time he fights next no matter how you feel about the quality of opponents hes defended it against , he will be in the top 10 for longest HW title reigns ever in the sport for guys that defended more then once . And you can’t deny Fury best win is lightyears ahead of Wilders he also never fought the rematch and gave up his belts to take a sabbatical and spent a couple years trying his best to be a 6’10 version of Chris Farley reincarnated. He still holds the lineal title to most fans and media but it’s a title in name only and not tangible. If Fury goes broke after retirement he couldn’t sell his lineal to a pawn shop or on Ebay. If his wife divorced him she wouldn’t try and go after his lineal title thinking she deserves 50% of it l. If Fury lost the title ,the next guy couldn’t take a picture with it around his waist. It means something
Depending on how you view the sport and the history but essentially worth the exact same as the fighters that hold the People’s Champ belt who didn’t get a decision fans think he deserved so this is the consolation prize
For the fight to make the most amount of $ it would be a PPV in the States where a case can be made that Wilder is currently the sports most popular American fighter , his fights are routinely among the highest viewed year after year and the PPV with Fury I believe was the most ordered PPV with the A-side being American who wasn’t named
Floyd since I think Bradley / Marquez. Hes clearly be the Fighter that would be responsible for most of the revenue generated in the States compared to Fury who hasn’t built up his profile to Wilder. But may change in the future now that he’ll be on ESPN but if Top Rank/ Warren are the lead Promoters of the rematch what’s having them not hosting in the UK and giving Fury home field advantage for it.
It can’t be because it was ruled andraw
When Most fans /media / Fighters thought that Fury did enough to win. If you look at the media / press scorecards about 44 % thought Wilder won 11% or was a draw 33% in their eyes and Fury won 56% according to the scores that I found. Not exactly a case for a robbery no matter how you view the end result.’ if a third of people scoring thought that the end result was fair and almost Half 46% had it Wilder winning or a draw. Half thought Fury won but is that enough to give up control of a rematch when basically half agreed with the final outcome
.
Look at the last draw that was considered a robbery and went against popular opinion and scorecards . Canelo / Golovkin. From the media / Fighters who scores I could find 87% thought Golovkin won and 13% thought it was a draw. The only people I found that gave it to Canelo was Dela Hoya , Hopkins
( I’m sure being Canelos Promoters has no effect on their scoring ) Chavez Jr. / Moreales ( who would never be swayed by their patriotism) and Mendoza head of the WBA ( who definitely wouldn’t want those Canelo sanctioning fees and who’s opinion on this wouldn’t make people believe any less the sport isn’t corrupt or shady as f.uck ) and to how it became a draw with the 2 judges basically reaffirming that the sport isn’t played on a level paying field being the least you can say about how they scored it
basically absolutely no one from over 100 different people in the sport who wasn’t biased as f.uck and have their opinion discounted thought Canelo won or even deserved a draw. But no one is on record saying that because of it he should lose any of his advantages or give up control for the rematch. That it shouldn’t be fought in Vegas a city that has never given Canelo even 1 unfavourable scorecard by 1 judge. A city that routinely gives him 1-6 extra rounds by that can be viewed as close or that in no way he deserves by every judge. No one thought or is on record that Golovkins team take control of the rematch and have the advantages and the location should be chosen by Loeffler and Golovkin. that it should be in Khazastan or Golivknks team should be the ones to have a say in the judges . Why would Wilder /Fury be any different because it was a unpopular outcome to just over half of the people watching? but no where near the Canelo/Golovkin fight with how people
Viewed the figh compared to final result.Wilder / Fury a case can’t really be made for the scorecards as being suspect or blatantly corrupt. Except The judge who scored it for Wilder gave him 7’rounds gave him the first 4 but didn’t give Wilder the 7th a round the 2 other judges gave Wilder. Even if you have that judge who scored it for Wilder and he only gave the first round of
First 4’ like the other 2 judges the end result is still a MD . the judge who scored it a
Draw had given Fury 7 of the first 11
Rounds and Fury would have won the fight on the cards had he not been KD and
Making it a 10-8 round.
Finally why should Fury be rewarded and benefit in the rematch when during negotiations he held secret meetings and signed with Top Rank. Which would making a immediate rematch harder if not impossible to make knowing how the current landscape of the sport looks like. Why bend over backwards and reward Fury and give him any advantages when negotiated the rematch not in good faith and who’s actions can be said were at least disingenuous to downright deceitful and shameful for a team to do business that way.
I want the Wilder /Fury rematch to happen like everyone else. Even if the offer is tremendous as Arum will have you believe . unless it’s absolutely insane $ and off the charts ****** . Can anyone even give a decent reason or think a reason as to why they expect or think Wilder should or would take a offer from ESPN and have him and
His team give up control of a possible rematch
allowing Top Rank to controll the fight have all the advantages they can try and get for Fury. Top Rank would be in charge of location ( UK ? ) picking the judges , Date , commentators and probably more and allow Top Rank to be the promoter and Espn the channel to be the ones who would be the ones to profit from a rematch.
I think Wilder is now the sports longest reigning World Champ and holds the most prestigious of the 4 straps and by the time he fights next no matter how you feel about the quality of opponents hes defended it against , he will be in the top 10 for longest HW title reigns ever in the sport for guys that defended more then once . And you can’t deny Fury best win is lightyears ahead of Wilders he also never fought the rematch and gave up his belts to take a sabbatical and spent a couple years trying his best to be a 6’10 version of Chris Farley reincarnated. He still holds the lineal title to most fans and media but it’s a title in name only and not tangible. If Fury goes broke after retirement he couldn’t sell his lineal to a pawn shop or on Ebay. If his wife divorced him she wouldn’t try and go after his lineal title thinking she deserves 50% of it l. If Fury lost the title ,the next guy couldn’t take a picture with it around his waist. It means something
Depending on how you view the sport and the history but essentially worth the exact same as the fighters that hold the People’s Champ belt who didn’t get a decision fans think he deserved so this is the consolation prize
For the fight to make the most amount of $ it would be a PPV in the States where a case can be made that Wilder is currently the sports most popular American fighter , his fights are routinely among the highest viewed year after year and the PPV with Fury I believe was the most ordered PPV with the A-side being American who wasn’t named
Floyd since I think Bradley / Marquez. Hes clearly be the Fighter that would be responsible for most of the revenue generated in the States compared to Fury who hasn’t built up his profile to Wilder. But may change in the future now that he’ll be on ESPN but if Top Rank/ Warren are the lead Promoters of the rematch what’s having them not hosting in the UK and giving Fury home field advantage for it.
It can’t be because it was ruled andraw
When Most fans /media / Fighters thought that Fury did enough to win. If you look at the media / press scorecards about 44 % thought Wilder won 11% or was a draw 33% in their eyes and Fury won 56% according to the scores that I found. Not exactly a case for a robbery no matter how you view the end result.’ if a third of people scoring thought that the end result was fair and almost Half 46% had it Wilder winning or a draw. Half thought Fury won but is that enough to give up control of a rematch when basically half agreed with the final outcome
.
Look at the last draw that was considered a robbery and went against popular opinion and scorecards . Canelo / Golovkin. From the media / Fighters who scores I could find 87% thought Golovkin won and 13% thought it was a draw. The only people I found that gave it to Canelo was Dela Hoya , Hopkins
( I’m sure being Canelos Promoters has no effect on their scoring ) Chavez Jr. / Moreales ( who would never be swayed by their patriotism) and Mendoza head of the WBA ( who definitely wouldn’t want those Canelo sanctioning fees and who’s opinion on this wouldn’t make people believe any less the sport isn’t corrupt or shady as f.uck ) and to how it became a draw with the 2 judges basically reaffirming that the sport isn’t played on a level paying field being the least you can say about how they scored it
basically absolutely no one from over 100 different people in the sport who wasn’t biased as f.uck and have their opinion discounted thought Canelo won or even deserved a draw. But no one is on record saying that because of it he should lose any of his advantages or give up control for the rematch. That it shouldn’t be fought in Vegas a city that has never given Canelo even 1 unfavourable scorecard by 1 judge. A city that routinely gives him 1-6 extra rounds by that can be viewed as close or that in no way he deserves by every judge. No one thought or is on record that Golovkins team take control of the rematch and have the advantages and the location should be chosen by Loeffler and Golovkin. that it should be in Khazastan or Golivknks team should be the ones to have a say in the judges . Why would Wilder /Fury be any different because it was a unpopular outcome to just over half of the people watching? but no where near the Canelo/Golovkin fight with how people
Viewed the figh compared to final result.Wilder / Fury a case can’t really be made for the scorecards as being suspect or blatantly corrupt. Except The judge who scored it for Wilder gave him 7’rounds gave him the first 4 but didn’t give Wilder the 7th a round the 2 other judges gave Wilder. Even if you have that judge who scored it for Wilder and he only gave the first round of
First 4’ like the other 2 judges the end result is still a MD . the judge who scored it a
Draw had given Fury 7 of the first 11
Rounds and Fury would have won the fight on the cards had he not been KD and
Making it a 10-8 round.
Finally why should Fury be rewarded and benefit in the rematch when during negotiations he held secret meetings and signed with Top Rank. Which would making a immediate rematch harder if not impossible to make knowing how the current landscape of the sport looks like. Why bend over backwards and reward Fury and give him any advantages when negotiated the rematch not in good faith and who’s actions can be said were at least disingenuous to downright deceitful and shameful for a team to do business that way.
Comment