Right ok I'll try and say it clearer for you to understand.
Yes the WBA is a recognised world title, absolutely. But it is just that, a belt. Maidana held the WBA title but was never the actual Champion at the weight. I.e he held a title. A paper champion.
You are aware that Crawford held all of the belts at 140 lbs right? The WBA, WBO, WBC and IBF all at the same time? You can't hold ALL the belts at the same time and be a paper champion. Those two things cannot coexist it's impossible.
Maidana was a paper champion. Crawford was not. That's just factual I'm afraid.
Yes the WBA is a recognised world title, absolutely. But it is just that, a belt. Maidana held the WBA title but was never the actual Champion at the weight. I.e he held a title. A paper champion.
You are aware that Crawford held all of the belts at 140 lbs right? The WBA, WBO, WBC and IBF all at the same time? You can't hold ALL the belts at the same time and be a paper champion. Those two things cannot coexist it's impossible.
Maidana was a paper champion. Crawford was not. That's just factual I'm afraid.
Comment