How can anyone have Crawford #1 P4P when his best win is Postol?
Collapse
-
Don't nobody need to cover up the fact that Triple L is a hype job.Comment
-
If you got Triple L "probably no.1" & l0m0 at no.2 then you better have Tenshin at no.3
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
You work for bob....Nelo is #1 P4P & beat Triple L twice. Stop fakin' da funk chris (a name the devil also uses....)Most felt he lost both GGG fights, in fact everyone felt he lost fight I. GGG is considered by those that put Canelo as #1 as a bad fighter or mediocre at best. Canelo also has a few failed drug tests and highly debatable decision vs. Lara. Do you think he possesses more skills and overall talent than Crawford, Lomachenko or Usyk? Would they struggle and go life and death getting debatable decisions with someone as average GGG at this point in their careers?
Canelo has just never distanced himself against his best opponents and his signature win is also a decision most disagreed with against a fighter many say is bad. For Crawford, Gamboa or Postol would be considered about equivalent as Lara or old Cotto and Crawford dominated far more impressively. Don't bring Mosley up either because that Mosley is worth less than Horn. That Mosley was KO'd by Bumdine.Comment
Comment