Ring Magazine once had Broner #6 P4P?

[RuleOfTheSpear]

Guerrero was in the list??

I'm done.

[lolpz]

At 135 he would still be king if he had stayed there.

He'd also be a problem for anybody at 140.

But instead he chose to chase the check, and it's worked out for him at the expense of his record.

[IronDanHamza]

The Ring also once had Guerrero, Maidana and Ortiz as p4p rated fighters, somewhere in the top 10...just before each of them faced Mayweather. You figure that one out for yourself.

Neither Maidana or Ortiz were ever on the P4P list.

[_original_]

And this is why I always argue with buffoons on here who say P4P is all about the "eye test" as opposed to resume and skills displayed against top competition. The eye test is pure nonsense and why guys like Broner get hyped up.

[Combat Talk Radio]

He'd also be a problem for anybody at 140.

You mean the weight that Mikey schooled him at?

[lolpz]

You mean the weight that Mikey schooled him at?

Mikey would school every 140lber you put in front of him, that doesn't exclude Broner.

[Curtis Harper]

P4P ''What If'' category. #6 sounds a bit high.

[soul_survivor]

Guerrero was in the list??

I'm done.

Yep, that tells you something about the ring.

[jas]

Yea

Kellerman, golden boy were raving about him

Nsb was on point though

Bookies had maidana 4 to 1 underdog

Nsb poll was split down the middle

[W1LL]

The RING once had Jeff Lacy top 10 P4P and #1 at Super Middleweight. If you look back on the internet they have totally erased any record of this happening. They conspire and they have an agenda. Haven't bought a copy of that magazine now for 5-6-7+ years.