Comments Thread For: Arum: Lomachenko Will Have His Hands Full With Commey

[chrisJS]

Loma is 30 yrs old,how old is tank? Didn't loma just face pedraza & struggle despite tank koing him?

Struggled by losing a round or two? That’s a stretch. He dominated him.

It’s probable Tank is Broner equivalent by age 30. He’s already had around double the fights Loma has. Most here say amateur stuff doesn’t matter either so hard to use that as an excuse too.

[landotter]

Broner has about 3-4 controversial wins. Has been #1 in at least two divisions less than Lomachenko, defeated less undefeated boxers, lessser guys period and has beaten thoroughly dominated 4 times and has clearly seen better days. In addition to which Lomachenko has shown far more skill, versatility and talent.

It’s not a valid comparison.

The comparison to Loma moving to 147 isn’t that valid either. Rigo (who you probably picked yet now refuse to give credit like many here that boldly picked Rigo) was 122 whereas Loma is a natural 126 whereas Loma would be on his 5th division and 21 lbs up from his natural weight rather than the 3rd division and 8 lbs of Rigo. Again, it just looks like a biased agenda driven comparison.

Is Loma overhyped? He may be. I think EVERY current boxer is as the sport is at its weakest point of the gloved era BUT I’ll trust the majority (TBRB, ESPN, Ring, BWAA, other UK outlets who cover boxing) with their assessment of his current standing (I.e p4p#1) over yours since it’s A) more credible, B) majority based and C) likely to be far less biased and agenda driven.

You can't see me or hear me... but trust me. I am applauding.

[The3]

Will the purse bid for Loma vs. Crolla stop the Loma vs. Commey fight from happening in April? I hope not, because I think Loma vs. Commey is a good fight! Salute to Andre Rozier! Looks like he has another one!

Not by rules you CAN skip mandatory for unifications

[Sleeks]

Broner has about 3-4 controversial wins. Has been #1 in at least two divisions less than Lomachenko, defeated less undefeated boxers, lessser guys period and has beaten thoroughly dominated 4 times and has clearly seen better days. In addition to which Lomachenko has shown far more skill, versatility and talent.

It’s not a valid comparison.

The comparison to Loma moving to 147 isn’t that valid either. Rigo (who you probably picked yet now refuse to give credit like many here that boldly picked Rigo) was 122 whereas Loma is a natural 126 whereas Loma would be on his 5th division and 21 lbs up from his natural weight rather than the 3rd division and 8 lbs of Rigo. Again, it just looks like a biased agenda driven comparison.

Is Loma overhyped? He may be. I think EVERY current boxer is as the sport is at its weakest point of the gloved era BUT I’ll trust the majority (TBRB, ESPN, Ring, BWAA, other UK outlets who cover boxing) with their assessment of his current standing (I.e p4p#1) over yours since it’s A) more credible, B) majority based and C) likely to be far less biased and agenda driven.

If Loma is a natural 126lber then Rigo is a natural 118lber. Rigo was fighting at 119lbs with same day weigh-ins in his mid-twenties, where as Lomachenko was fighting at 126lbs as a 19 year-old before his body had fully developed.

Lomachenko was 138lbs on fight night for his 126lbs fight vs Russell Jr, meanwhile Rigondeaux was 125lbs on fight night for his 122lbs fight vs Doniare. They are obviously multiple weight classes apart.

[chrisJS]

If Loma is a natural 126lber then Rigo is a natural 118lber. Rigo was fighting at 119lbs with same day weigh-ins in his mid-twenties, he could've easily fought at 118lbs as a professional.

Lomachenko was 138lbs on fight night for his 126lbs fight vs Russell Jr, meanwhile Rigondeaux was 125lbs on fight night for his 122lbs fight vs Doniare. They are obviously multiple weight classes apart.

I’ve seen him live ringside and met him, he’s a very small Featherweight. He’s smaller than Marquez, Barrera, Morales other 126 guys I’ve met.

Rigo isn’t that big at 122 I’ll agree. Still the comparison he made was awful and tragically flawed but I know why. Agenda.

[Sweet_Science2]

That is not the same you idiot! Lomachenko has already moved up 2 weight classes, he is not a natural 135lber...Rigo never moved up a weight class before the Loma fight. Lomachenko vs Prograis or a Josh Taylor or Jose Ramirez is a better comparison. Loma at 140 is the same as Rigo at 130 since Loma looks to be a natural 130lber.

Rigo couldn't even land a glove on Lomachenko despite having a reach advantage, let that sink in ! Salty Rigo nuthugger. Your boy quit like a *****.

First of all shut your f@ggot ass up and speak with dignity when you approach me pussie. Moving up two weight classes is moving up two f@ggot.

I'll ask again would you give Thurman, Spence, Crawford credit for destroying Lomo at 147????? Exactly f@ggot.

Lomo is over hyped period. Salido proved that. Bring up his amateurs yet he got his ass beat by a guy with more losses than he has fights.

Broner is younger and had 4 titles at different weight classes bytch. Everyone Broner lost to would destroy a Salido type of fighter. Lomo is a hype job plain and simple.

[Sweet_Science2]

broner is a hype job who's been exposed multiple times over lol. broner fought for vacant belts against cherry picked opposition you ***g those wins are a joke. broner was never p4p top ten ever. lomachenko is for a reason. you're another dumb racist hater.

Shut your f@ggot ass up bytch! Broner WAS never crowned P4P f@ggot. I'm making a comparison off of age and titles in different weight classes. Broner is younger with more weight classes under his belt. And never lost to the over the hill dude like Salido.

Lomo is a hype job. His best win is against a 37 year old moving up 2 weight classes. Zero credit for that.

Imagine if a 30 year old Lomo moved up to 147 to be served on a pdish to: Crawford, Thurman, Spence how you hype job loving f@ggots would react?

Would you give them credit for knocking his fuucking head off??? Exactly shut your punk ass up

[Sweet_Science2]

Broner has about 3-4 controversial wins. Has been #1 in at least two divisions less than Lomachenko, defeated less undefeated boxers, lessser guys period and has beaten thoroughly dominated 4 times and has clearly seen better days. In addition to which Lomachenko has shown far more skill, versatility and talent.

It’s not a valid comparison.

The comparison to Loma moving to 147 isn’t that valid either. Rigo (who you probably picked yet now refuse to give credit like many here that boldly picked Rigo) was 122 whereas Loma is a natural 126 whereas Loma would be on his 5th division and 21 lbs up from his natural weight rather than the 3rd division and 8 lbs of Rigo. Again, it just looks like a biased agenda driven comparison.

Is Loma overhyped? He may be. I think EVERY current boxer is as the sport is at its weakest point of the gloved era BUT I’ll trust the majority (TBRB, ESPN, Ring, BWAA, other UK outlets who cover boxing) with their assessment of his current standing (I.e p4p#1) over yours since it’s A) more credible, B) majority based and C) likely to be far less biased and agenda driven.

Broner was NEVER considered P4P number 1 by Any credible source. He has done more in the sport at a younger age than Lomo. FACTS! Those same fighters would Dominate Lomo. Facts! Garcia for damn sure, Pacquiao, Porter, and Maidana would do a number on lomo something like Salido did.

I don't give a flying fuuck about Broner. I'm saying if Broner he Lomos current resume. No one beside his dad, girl and trainer would say he is #1 P4P. Yet people claim lomo bum ass is? Yeah right.

Salido beat that ass. If he fights another talented heavy hitter at 135/140 nyquil time.

Garcia would have took his lunch money if Arum old ass wouldn't have blocked the fight. It's cool he will get Another healthy ass whooping real soon.

[Sweet_Science2]

Broner has more titles in more divisions than Crawford, Spence, Inoue, Usyk, Canelo, Mikey Garcia (who whipped him) too does that make him better? By your theory he’s currently #2 behind Pacquaio, who’s obviously your all-time #1, right?

Broner would also be better historically than Hagler, Monzon, Sanchez, Chavez, Arguello, Jofre, Pep, Greb, Robinson, Trinidad, Hopkins, Calzaghe just to name a random handful of fighters who’ve won in “less divisions”.

Damn. I didn’t realize Broner was that great. I admire that your so devouted to a guy who’s been absolutely thrashed by the only 4 times without putting up a fight and has about 3-4 gift wins over mediocre guys.

Hop off lomos dyck f@ggot. I don't give a fuuck about Broner. I said if Broner HAD Lomos resume NOBODY would consider him p4p pussie.

Lomo is a hype job who got his ass whooped by Salido. Canelo, Crawford, Spence, Hagler any Atg would never lose to a bum like that while in their prime young and fresh.

I mean people always bring up his excellent amateurs right? That shyt didn't help vs Salido. Lomos is a certified hype job! He has to step his game all the way up before he even sniffs p4p status.

Fighting Tanks left overs and struggling, old ass Rigo moving uo two weight classes doesn't cut it. You know got damn well if a black fighter did that they would get zero credit.

Lomo is a hype job, you pussie only like him cause he looks white. He's not even white which is crazy. You ******* love them white/European fighters but don't show the same love to your own country black fighters who do and would beat the dog shyt out of those white/European fighters.

If Lomo fight a prime dominated black fighter like Crawford we will see who is who!

Ward destroyed Kovalev, no white/European fighter ever seen the final bell agianst Mayweather. FACTS!

I don't even have to mention the all time greats: Robinson, Ali, Frazier, Leornard, Tyson you get the picture.

The fact your reacting you know I'm right. Lomo is a hype job until further notice. Facts

[chrisJS]

Broner was NEVER considered P4P number 1 by Any credible source. He has done more in the sport at a younger age than Lomo. FACTS! Those same fighters would Dominate Lomo. Facts! Garcia for damn sure, Pacquiao, Porter, and Maidana would do a number on lomo something like Salido did.

I don't give a flying fuuck about Broner. I'm saying if Broner he Lomos current resume. No one beside his dad, girl and trainer would say he is #1 P4P. Yet people claim lomo bum ass is? Yeah right.

Salido beat that ass. If he fights another talented heavy hitter at 135/140 nyquil time.

Garcia would have took his lunch money if Arum old ass wouldn't have blocked the fight. It's cool he will get Another healthy ass whooping real soon.

I think you dislike him for reasons that aren’t boxing and you’re letting it cloud your judgement. I doubt you’ve ever seen the Salido fight which was a bit of a robbery and his second fight. Salido isn’t a bum either.

I think more than his family have him #1 which is why the grown ups at TBRB, BWAA, Ring, ESPN and the British outlets all him him as their p4p#1. I’ve even heard Spence who said dumb **** about him even had him #1 lol.

Broner has been #1 in maybe 1 division? Loma has been #1 in three and he’s proven people like you wrong. There’s no way you picked him over Russell or Walters and I doubt even Rigo. Sure, you’ll cry about the weight now but before that fight fans like you said the weight didn’t matter. He’s won fighter of the year and is regarded as consensus p4p #1 and has beaten more unbeatens and more champs than Broner. He has Broner beat everywhere. If he and Broner traded ethnicity you’d say the exact opposite we both know this.