Comments Thread For: Arum: Lomachenko Will Have His Hands Full With Commey

[Sweet_Science2]

So I gather you hate Lomachenko and you think he hasn't done enough to meet your standards? Or is it something else that has nothing to do with how and what the man has done and you're simply not coming out and saying so? Just asking.

He's overhyped period. If his name was Broner with the exact same resume he would not be crowned as P4P period.

I'll ask you this question. Would you give Thurman, Spence, Crawford, Porter full credit for knocking out Lomo at 147?

If you say no then Lomo gets zero credit for beating an almost 40 year old moving up 2 weight classes.

So do you like Broner? I mean he is younger than Lomo more belts in weight classes. He should be one of the best right?

You see how ****** that shyt sounds. Lomo has WAY more work to do. Salido has more losses than Lomo has fights. Let that marinate homie.

Checkmate.

[jackblack008]

135 is dry right now.
Berchelt is a better fight or may be fighting the WBSS 140 winner

[DuckAdonis]

The guy who lost to Robert Easter is gonna whoop Lomachenko @$$??? Nope don't see it happening lol

He is a better fighter than Easter in my opinion...I thought he won the first fight, hurt Easter badly and I think he wins a rematch vs Easter as he has improved significantly in his last 2 fights.

[DuckAdonis]

Like he did against Salido?? Are you mean small old Rigo moving up two weight classes to fight him?

How much credit would you give: Thurman, Spence, Crawford for beating the dog shyt out of Lomo for moving up two weight classes?

And he is not damn there 40. So how much credit would you give them?

That is not the same you idiot! Lomachenko has already moved up 2 weight classes, he is not a natural 135lber...Rigo never moved up a weight class before the Loma fight. Lomachenko vs Prograis or a Josh Taylor or Jose Ramirez is a better comparison. Loma at 140 is the same as Rigo at 130 since Loma looks to be a natural 130lber.

Rigo couldn't even land a glove on Lomachenko despite having a reach advantage, let that sink in ! Salty Rigo nuthugger. Your boy quit like a *****.

[SHOOTALLCLOWNS]

Amateurs don't mean shyt in the pros. Broner has more titles in more weight classes AND younger than Lomo. You must give Broner a lot of credit for that huh?

But your f@ggot ass still didn't answer. Would you give: Thurman, Spence, Crawford credit for beating the shyt out of Lomo at 147????

And he is not almost 40. So would you give them credit??? BODYBAG NEXT

broner is a hype job who's been exposed multiple times over lol. broner fought for vacant belts against cherry picked opposition you ***g those wins are a joke. broner was never p4p top ten ever. lomachenko is for a reason. you're another dumb racist hater.

[kushking]

Berchelt would constitute a live body, not coming up in weight and/or coming off losses so it's a no-go for Loma. Loma exclusively fights smaller dudes/cupchins moving up in weight coming off losses most his career.

Read the qoute,there fixed it for ya.

[chrisJS]

Read the qoute,there fixed it for ya.

Marriaga was the only one coming off a loss, Rigo was the only one coming up in weight but was ranked p4p too.

Wouldn’t exactly say Russell, Walters or Linares were coming off losses or up in weight. Walters fought at 130 before Loma and all dudes had long winning streaks.

Loma’s resume ****s on Tanks. It’s not even close.

[chrisJS]

He's overhyped period. If his name was Broner with the exact same resume he would not be crowned as P4P period.

I'll ask you this question. Would you give Thurman, Spence, Crawford, Porter full credit for knocking out Lomo at 147?

If you say no then Lomo gets zero credit for beating an almost 40 year old moving up 2 weight classes.

So do you like Broner? I mean he is younger than Lomo more belts in weight classes. He should be one of the best right?

You see how ****** that shyt sounds. Lomo has WAY more work to do. Salido has more losses than Lomo has fights. Let that marinate homie.

Checkmate.

Broner has about 3-4 controversial wins. Has been #1 in at least two divisions less than Lomachenko, defeated less undefeated boxers, lessser guys period and has beaten thoroughly dominated 4 times and has clearly seen better days. In addition to which Lomachenko has shown far more skill, versatility and talent.

It’s not a valid comparison.

The comparison to Loma moving to 147 isn’t that valid either. Rigo (who you probably picked yet now refuse to give credit like many here that boldly picked Rigo) was 122 whereas Loma is a natural 126 whereas Loma would be on his 5th division and 21 lbs up from his natural weight rather than the 3rd division and 8 lbs of Rigo. Again, it just looks like a biased agenda driven comparison.

Is Loma overhyped? He may be. I think EVERY current boxer is as the sport is at its weakest point of the gloved era BUT I’ll trust the majority (TBRB, ESPN, Ring, BWAA, other UK outlets who cover boxing) with their assessment of his current standing (I.e p4p#1) over yours since it’s A) more credible, B) majority based and C) likely to be far less biased and agenda driven.

[chrisJS]

Amateurs don't mean shyt in the pros. Broner has more titles in more weight classes AND younger than Lomo. You must give Broner a lot of credit for that huh?

But your f@ggot ass still didn't answer. Would you give: Thurman, Spence, Crawford credit for beating the shyt out of Lomo at 147????

And he is not almost 40. So would you give them credit??? BODYBAG NEXT

Broner has more titles in more divisions than Crawford, Spence, Inoue, Usyk, Canelo, Mikey Garcia (who whipped him) too does that make him better? By your theory he’s currently #2 behind Pacquaio, who’s obviously your all-time #1, right?

Broner would also be better historically than Hagler, Monzon, Sanchez, Chavez, Arguello, Jofre, Pep, Greb, Robinson, Trinidad, Hopkins, Calzaghe just to name a random handful of fighters who’ve won in “less divisions”.

Damn. I didn’t realize Broner was that great. I admire that your so devouted to a guy who’s been absolutely thrashed by the only 4 times without putting up a fight and has about 3-4 gift wins over mediocre guys.

[kushking]

Marriaga was the only one coming off a loss, Rigo was the only one coming up in weight but was ranked p4p too.

Wouldn’t exactly say Russell, Walters or Linares were coming off losses or up in weight. Walters fought at 130 before Loma and all dudes had long winning streaks.

Loma’s resume ****s on Tanks. It’s not even close.

Loma is 30 yrs old,how old is tank? Didn't loma just face pedraza & struggle despite tank koing him?