Comments Thread For: Eubank Jr: DeGale Grudge Match is Up There with Froch-Groves 1

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Split Decision
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2014
    • 2077
    • 282
    • 229
    • 54,303

    #21
    Originally posted by Nusky
    Alot of these UK guys are delusional. I mean at this point is this fight even a big deal over there? I remember Froch Groves2 being a MUUUUUUCH bigger deal.
    well one was at wembley stadium and one wasnt so yeah

    but he said froch groves 1

    which is still wrong

    Comment

    • _Rexy_
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2018
      • 27929
      • 6,140
      • 3,585
      • 358,040

      #22
      Originally posted by Split Decision
      not even on terms of rivalry

      groves froch 1 was a legit grudge match as carl looked down on groves and groves didnt respect froch, genuine hate there

      eubank and degale dont like each other because they needed to to sell the fight
      Really? I was under the impression that they had some long standing grudge, and the issue people had with it is that they're both shot at this point. (well, Degale is shot and Eubank just turned out to be not good)

      Comment

      • apollocreed
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 1222
        • 43
        • 2
        • 27,626

        #23
        Originally posted by DreamFighter
        I was referring to the level above world, if he was aiming to be elite then I take it assumed he must have got to solid world class.


        is he ***, several have eclipsed him already and its only been 8 years, nor did he top some who came before him. Sure hes backdoor hall of fame though by getting his unrecognised defences "retro-recognised".
        So solid world class is not a failure.

        Re Calzaghe, I said it's almost universally acknowledged. It's not just my opinion, that's a fact. I could give you loads of examples where he's been voted as the best ever at 168 by respected magazines, journalists, boxers etc. This website voted him as an ATG. I'll give you links if you want when I have time.

        Comment

        • DreamFighter
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2012
          • 4221
          • 119
          • 43
          • 54,494

          #24
          Originally posted by apollocreed
          So solid world class is not a failure.
          exactly, and he failed to reach elite level, the two are mutally operative.

          Re Calzaghe, I said it's almost universally acknowledged.
          and I said hes not, thats a fact.

          Comment

          • apollocreed
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 1222
            • 43
            • 2
            • 27,626

            #25
            Originally posted by DreamFighter
            exactly, and he failed to reach elite level, the two are mutally operative.

            and I said hes not, thats a fact.
            Like I said, many journalists, ex pro's, websites etc have stated he's the best at 168. Whether you agree with the term 'almost universally recognized' doesn't really matter.
            There will always be people who disagree, but the overall consensus is that he's an ATG.

            By Cliff Rold - It shouldn’t matter, but it did. Logic said Joe Calzaghe, while only three years younger, had too much in the tank to be troubled much by a man who still looks like Roy Jones Jr. (52-5, 38 KO) but doesn’t fight much like him anymore. Boxing though is a sport where passions and memories run deep and seeing is believing. Beating big names is often as important as beating better challenges without them. The nature of Calzaghe’s win over Jones, sans logic, is forcing tons of conversation about his place in history which really made just as much sense a week ago.


            On the 28th of March, 1984, Murray Sutherland, with a modest record of forty-one wins, eleven losses and one draw, defeated Ernie Singletary for the vacant

            Comment

            • DreamFighter
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2012
              • 4221
              • 119
              • 43
              • 54,494

              #26
              Originally posted by apollocreed
              Like I said, many journalists, ex pro's, websites etc have stated he's the best at 168. Whether you agree with the term 'almost universally recognized' doesn't really matter.
              There will always be people who disagree, but the overall consensus is that he's an ATG.

              By Cliff Rold - It shouldn’t matter, but it did. Logic said Joe Calzaghe, while only three years younger, had too much in the tank to be troubled much by a man who still looks like Roy Jones Jr. (52-5, 38 KO) but doesn’t fight much like him anymore. Boxing though is a sport where passions and memories run deep and seeing is believing. Beating big names is often as important as beating better challenges without them. The nature of Calzaghe’s win over Jones, sans logic, is forcing tons of conversation about his place in history which really made just as much sense a week ago.


              https://www.boxing247.com/boxing-new...all-time/37137
              its not, way more agree that jones would have handily outpointed him if not stopped.

              Comment

              • apollocreed
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 1222
                • 43
                • 2
                • 27,626

                #27
                Originally posted by DreamFighter
                its not, way more agree that jones would have handily outpointed him if not stopped.
                No it isn’t. I’ve not seen a majority of journalists, websites etc that say that.
                Some, OK, but not a majority.
                Emanuel Steward said during the HBO commentary for the Calzaghe Jones fight that Calzaghe would have been a hard fight for Jones at any stage of his career.

                Comment

                • DreamFighter
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Nov 2012
                  • 4221
                  • 119
                  • 43
                  • 54,494

                  #28
                  Originally posted by apollocreed
                  No it isn’t. I’ve not seen a majority of journalists, websites etc that say that.
                  Some, OK, but not a majority.
                  Emanuel Steward said during the HBO commentary for the Calzaghe Jones fight that Calzaghe would have been a hard fight for Jones at any stage of his career.
                  sure hard fight, but he would have handily outpointed him.
                  so therefore joe is not the best SMW, you've agreed already.
                  the list continues. joe has been left behind.

                  Comment

                  • apollocreed
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 1222
                    • 43
                    • 2
                    • 27,626

                    #29
                    Originally posted by DreamFighter
                    sure hard fight, but he would have handily outpointed him.
                    so therefore joe is not the best SMW, you've agreed already.
                    the list continues. joe has been left behind.
                    I haven’t agreed to ****ing anything. I said Steward said Calzaghe could possibly beat prime Jones.
                    I never said what I think would happen. As I stated to begin with, I’m not even talking about my personal opinion.
                    The fact is numerous journalists, websites and pros have stated it is THEIR opinion he is the best ever at 168, and an ATG.
                    Me personally, I tend to give more credence to the hall of fame panel than dreamfighter on boxingscene.
                    Last edited by apollocreed; 02-05-2019, 11:54 AM.

                    Comment

                    • DreamFighter
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2012
                      • 4221
                      • 119
                      • 43
                      • 54,494

                      #30
                      Originally posted by apollocreed
                      I haven’t agreed to ****ing anything. I said Steward said Calzaghe could possibly beat prime Jones.
                      steward didnt say anything of the sort, the words u chose said it would be a hard fight. u need a new quote to substantiate that. TUTTUT - claiming you got the facts and then using a lie instead. You ruined your own credibility.

                      I think what you do mean is joe is the most accomplished SMW. He definitely has an argument for that, though one would consider Sven Ottke to be ahead seeing as he made more recognised title defences. Sven being the forum joke is besides the point.


                      Thats your sole argument of credence. Hardly the greatest in terms of ability, ward outdid his greatest career end feat in his first SMW title fight.

                      Likewise several SMWs would be considered better H2H. Sadly we dont know h2h because joe kept well clear of them nearly all his career.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP