Comments Thread For: Frank Warren: Hearn's Offer is Nowhere Near What Fury is Worth

[352]

If you're talking about world title belts, he has 3 out of 4. If you're talking about belts that hold your pants up, he has dozens.

I can count. Can you?

In any event, Fury has none.

[N/A]

I can count. Can you?

Apparently you can't count since you're claiming boxing has 5 world titles when it only has 4.

[Scipio2009]

Again this could be another Eddie spin but I believe he has offered Wilder 40%. He said when AJ eventually moves on with his opponent all his offers will be revealed and fans will know what Wilder walked away from. He then went on to say if Wilder wants 40% he has it, Fury too blah blah blah. He gave his reasons for lowballing Dillian and stated he will return with another offer.

I think at this stage if Hearn was lying about his offers team Wilder will be quick to say he is lying if he was lying. I’m sure all will be revealed. However what I will say is that Deontay has no intention of fighting Joshua next even if he was offered 45%.

Frank Warren has already gone public with his opinion of Fury's offer, and if Hearn has really paralleled the offers (I doubt that the actual offer, in dollar value or points on the event, was anywhere near 40%), it's pretty obvious that the Wilder offer was so BS that it wasn't even worth a response.

After capturing the interest of the boxing world, why would Wilder or Fury give Eddie Hearn any extra pub?

[P4Pdunny]

they are all bogus, all three teams

[McNulty]

All we want is a fair fight. So no American judges and no British judges.

This approach is not going to work.

[Noelanthony]

Frank Warren has already gone public with his opinion of Fury's offer, and if Hearn has really paralleled the offers (I doubt that the actual offer, in dollar value or points on the event, was anywhere near 40%), it's pretty obvious that the Wilder offer was so BS that it wasn't even worth a response.

After capturing the interest of the boxing world, why would Wilder or Fury give Eddie Hearn any extra pub?

Now Frank Warren is the Voice of reason? Frank Warren says Fury deserves 50/50 vs AJ but will accept 40% against Wilder please explain the logic to me please? Frank warren also stated Fury would earn more fighting Wilder than Joshua. Do you believe that? Let’s not get carried away with the quotes of Frank Warren. All will be revealed shortly

[Noelanthony]

I think Wilder and his team were adamant about not discussing Joshua in any detail and in recent interviews he has not been asked about any offers. I don't really see what Wilder has to gain by publicly rebuking anything Hearn says when they're full intention is to fight the rematch.

Are you saying that the email from last year that created radio silence had a 40% offer or that the statement Hearn made was in essence a 40% offer?

I’m saying that if Deontay ‘ Baby oil ‘Wilder wanted a fight he knows 40% was on the table for him.

Fury took the necessary steps to inquire by calling Eddie and I’m sure Fury will not waste anytime in exposing just how sheet the offer was when he kicks of his publicity tour for the rematch.

Do I believe Wilder was offered 40%? Yes I do. If I’m wrong I have no qualms coming on here and saying I was conned

[Jax teller]

Apparently you can't count since you're claiming boxing has 5 world titles when it only has 4.

Stop trying to impose your OPINION on other people like its a fact.

If people can choose to recognise Fury's questionable lineage as wasn't started with #1 Wlad & #2 Witali it was #1 Wlad & #3 Chageav and not undisputed either then they can choose to recognise the IBO.

[SeGoodland]

Its these kind of interviews that really makes Warren look ******, IMO. Warren is constantly talking about what Hearn and Joshua are doing and its embarrassing.

There is a rematch, great.

No real boxing fan can claim that Fury is worth 50% of a Joshua fight.

Warren needs to try and promote a fight without using Hearn or Joshua's name.

BTW, Brick Lane is a decent night out.

[Bronx2245]

This sort of thing fathoms me. Why do you put so much stock into agenda driven comments when you have so little of the facts?.

I'm not putting any stock into it, unless Hearn does not dispute what they say. Why do you put so much stock in what Hearn says?