Comments Thread For: Hearn: Wilder, His Handlers Don't Have Decency To Answer Back
Collapse
-
Wow, you sure went off the rails quickly. Haha! And you're right about the PPV prices, I got the figures wrong. But this is according to Dan Rafael: 'Based on 325,000 buys, the pay-per-view grossed around $24 million'. Also, you ignored the part about the UK PPV buys.Last edited by Bad Bart; 01-22-2019, 05:50 AM.Comment
-
Actual events and actuals facts mate. If you was a boxing fan you'd be pissed that Finkle didn't attend the meeting he'd already agreed just for the sake of trying everything.Comment
-
Whyte probably did get a lowball offer but to be fair its a fight nobody really wants to see so they probably tossed a feeler offer out to him. If he would do the fight cheap, fine, if not they will look for a more attractive fight.As mentioned earlier in this thread Hearn has been accused of lowball offers numerous times now doe. The fact a in house guy is saying it just makes it more likely to be legit.
And honestly when hes losing purse bids to known tight wad Bob Arum & he can't sign a non-also ran free agent to Matchroom USA it says to me he's not offering fighters their true value.
Also Whyte is "in house" but he hates AJ more than anyone having been ko'd by him last time so he's not likely to say nice things is he.
Notice how they never had any issue making the Klitschko fight, and povetkin never had any complaints.
Both of those guys have made mega purses in their career, cam to a deal easily and in povetkins case didn't even need to go to purse bids backed by his billionare financier
but what neither of them is is a loudmouth or wanted to avoid the fight for any reason
funny how they had no trouble getting a deal across the line is it
Whyte
Duco Events
Fury
Wilder
All 4 talk a LOT of **** nonstop and those are the 4 that have proved difficult to deal with
None of the decent, honest opponents AJ has faced has had one issue with matchroomComment
-
Comment
-
It is for the winner of Fury vs Wilder II. Why would you take 40% now vs 50% after you win?
And granted it goes w/o saying someone is walking away the loser in this deal, but personnally I don't think either man thinks they are losing the rematch.
I'd be more inclined to your thought process if money didn't seem a problem everywhere for Hearn. He's lowballing. He's losing purse bids to bean counter Arum. He can't sign a non-B squad guy to Matchroom USA. Its pretty apparent to me Hearn's bank account isn't as big as hyped or he's tighter than a Asian ****** on prom night.The problem Hearn has got is that it’s in everyone’s interest to say that they have been lowballed.Comment
-
As a boxing fan, I'm pissed that you and your mates continue spread nonsense in the service of a PROMOTER, who again cost the fighter you supposedly support over $80 million and us fans the fight.Comment
-
So you’re saying 60/40 to Fury or Wilder right now (plus the shot at the belts) is a low-ball offer?It is for the winner of Fury vs Wilder II. Why would you take 40% now vs 50% after you win?
And granted it goes w/o saying someone is walking away the loser in this deal, but personnally I don't think either man thinks they are losing the rematch.
I'd be more inclined to your thought process if money didn't seem a problem everywhere for Hearn. He's lowballing. He's losing purse bids to bean counter Arum. He can't sign a non-B squad guy to Matchroom USA. Its pretty apparent to me Hearn's bank account isn't as big as hyped or he's tighter than a Asian ****** on prom night.
Dude, that’s really not what most people would consider a low-ball.Comment
Comment