Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: Wilder, His Handlers Don't Have Decency To Answer Back

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
    As mentioned earlier in this thread Hearn has been accused of lowball offers numerous times now doe. The fact a in house guy is saying it just makes it more likely to be legit.

    And honestly when hes losing purse bids to known tight wad Bob Arum & he can't sign a non-also ran free agent to Matchroom USA it says to me he's not offering fighters their true value.
    I just explained the esteem Whyte is holding himself to though so if he thinks his worth to AJ is similar to Wilder of Fury he probably will think he has been lowballed. You didn't see Wilder getting accused of lowballing Ortiz for what worked to be the same as 15% split and there is a bigger gap between AJ and Whyte with the extra belts and a loss already to AJ.

    What was the fight and who was the fighter? (For a little context)

    You can't expect someone to be buying all the fights and all the fighters it wouldn't be cost effective, he's running a business at the end of the day.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Bad Bart View Post
      As a boxing fan, I'm pissed that you and your mates continue spread nonsense in the service of a PROMOTER, who again cost the fighter you supposedly support over $80 million and us fans the fight.
      If you believe it's 80 mil then you believe the money came from BT as thats what Warren said in the same interview and he's the only one that said about 30 mil rematch.



      Clips of everyone on Wilders side saying what I'm telling you, watch it or don't. But don't go round telling people stuff is made up if you're not prepared to watch the actual proof.

      Comment


      • #83
        Hearns sounding like some desperate, needy, teenage girl mad when a guy doesn't immediately text her back after 5 minutes, when all she is, is potential side-chick material anyways lmao.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Bad Bart View Post
          What's funny is you actually believe that.
          What have you seen that suggests otherwise. I’ll believe the numbers that I’ve seen reported from multiple sources. I’m sure you don’t though because it goes against your agenda

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Redgloveman View Post
            So you’re saying 60/40 to Fury or Wilder right now (plus the shot at the belts) is a low-ball offer?
            If the winner of the rematch gets 50% it sure as f#ck is.

            If this fight for the #1 spot is a $80M-$100M revenue fight on the fighters end the difference between 40% & 50% is $8M to $10M more money. Whatever it is revenue-wise its leaving millions of dollars on the table thats not debatable.

            Its risky for both like I said but its worth several million dollars more to the winner.

            Comment


            • #86
              First off of all 60/40 was not the offer. He said we MAYBE willing to CAP OFF at 60/40.

              Secondly the Charlo brothers who aren't even taking a FIGHT with him ALSO SAID HE OFFERED THEM BULLSHYT MONEY!!!

              So I get it they are lying too.

              Hearns must be some of you guys Baby Daddies because I have NEVER seen Men stand up for another with such passion and dedication

              5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE SAY HE TRIES TO SNAKE THEM ON SUCKER STUFF IN LESS THAN ONE YEAR YET THEY ALL ARE LYING!!!

              GEEEEEEEEEEEEEZZZZZZ US KHRIST!!!

              https://www.************.com/2018/10...m-and-jermell/

              You guys are CERTIFIED CLOWNS!!!

              Comment


              • #87
                The fights going to be against miller which is why Whyte Wilder n fury are getting low ball offers so hearn can say I offered all of them they didn't want the fight common practice in boxing for a promoter to protect golden goose while saving face

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Jax teller View Post
                  I just explained the esteem Whyte is holding himself to though so if he thinks his worth to AJ is similar to Wilder of Fury he probably will think he has been lowballed.
                  Hearn has been headlining him on PPV's. I'm no Whyte supporter. I dog him quite often actually, but the guy is the 2nd biggest HW in the UK in popularity it would seem. Idk what that should be worth or shouldn't be worth %-wise with **** measuring respective PPV revenue, but I know Whyte should be making more money for Joshua than Del Boy which was his claim that I heard & I've not heard the always talkative Hearn deny Whyte's claim.

                  What was the fight and who was the fighter? (For a little context)
                  Not sure what you are asking from me here exactly. I just know a lot of sh^t with Hearn & money is ironically not adding up since this move to the US & prime time world wide boxing.

                  You can't expect someone to be buying all the fights and all the fighters it wouldn't be cost effective, he's running a business at the end of the day.
                  Who's "all the fighters" he's picking up? He's got an assortment of B-listers for Matchroom USA.

                  What fights are breaking the bank? Andrade vs that random guy? Farmer vs that random guy? Big Baby vs that random guy?

                  I mean maybe the most telling thing is he's losing purse bids to f#cking Bob Arum. Bob Arum is a notorious wallet hugger. So that says something that Hearn is out tightwadding the 80 something year old tightwad king.
                  Last edited by Eff Pandas; 01-22-2019, 07:03 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    You people are crazy!

                    His first offer was 65/35!

                    Only after both guys told him to kick rocks and the mandatory was announced did he finally try to make a DECENT OFFER!!!

                    If you fight Joshua it has to be in house. He picks the day and time. He eats steak and lobster while you get chicken nuggets and peanut butter and jelly.

                    NOT EVERYONE IS WILLING TO GET CHEATED!!!

                    I would take less money from a guy who came to Me and treated Me like a MAN than from a coward who offers Me more but wants Me to wear a dress!!

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                      If the winner of the rematch gets 50% it sure as f#ck is.

                      If this fight for the #1 spot is a $80M-$100M revenue fight on the fighters end the difference between 40% & 50% is $8M to $10M more money. Whatever it is revenue-wise its leaving millions of dollars on the table thats not debatable.

                      Its risky for both like I said but its worth several million dollars more to the winner.
                      No, it sure as f#ck isn't.

                      Firstly, because it doesn't fit in with the known definition of what "lowball" actually means in any event and secondly because, despite what you think about Fury and Wilder being sure that they'll win, it's just a commercial reality that the 50/50 offer will be closed to one of them after the rematch (that's IF, 50/50 is offered by the way; which is by no means is certain and is further contingent on the performance of the rematch).

                      60/40 now, without the risk of the chance to fight for the titles AND receive a career-high payday vanishing forever, is NOT a lowball offer, whichever way you slice it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP