? What are you talking about. Korobov just essentially fought Charlo to a draw. There was no real separation between the two of them. And Korobov has a win over Uzcategui, which is probably better than Charlo's only real other win, which is over Trout? So what accolades does Charlo have exactly? Dervy has a win over Johnson and also went 12 hard rounds with Danny Jacobs - Andrade's only win in his whole career so far is a 154 SD over Vanes? I mean what are you talking about with pro accolades so far for him or Charlo lol? It's actually not even debatable dude - at 160 and just regardless of weight class even, Dervy and Korobov have done more than both Andrade and Charlo as pros. None of them have done a whole lot of anything, but what exactly have Charlo and Andrade done that are better wins than Uzi and Tureano Johnson? All they have are a Vanes SD and a Trout 7-5 win lol.
Not to mention when you factor in the amateur pedigrees of Korobov and Dervy, they are clearly more accomplished there than Charlo.
Anyway I like 160 Charlo and Andrade and think they are good fighters, but they haven't really even stepped up to A level yet. When Charlo has stepped up to B level he has basically shown to be as good as the guy he is fighting (Trout and Korobov). Andrade stepped up twice as well and showed he was about as good as Vanes and Culcay. Not terrible but again all those guys are B list at best. That you reacted so indignantly to the pretty clear truth that Charlo and Andrade have not even done as much as a Korobov or a Dervy, I mean it again shows your bias. We all have some bias in us, so it's whatever. But it's just strange that you say that they not only pass the eye test for you (that is understandable, although they have looked average every time they step up,and haven't even stepped to A level yet) but they also have done a lot as pros...(just isn't true).
Not to mention when you factor in the amateur pedigrees of Korobov and Dervy, they are clearly more accomplished there than Charlo.
Anyway I like 160 Charlo and Andrade and think they are good fighters, but they haven't really even stepped up to A level yet. When Charlo has stepped up to B level he has basically shown to be as good as the guy he is fighting (Trout and Korobov). Andrade stepped up twice as well and showed he was about as good as Vanes and Culcay. Not terrible but again all those guys are B list at best. That you reacted so indignantly to the pretty clear truth that Charlo and Andrade have not even done as much as a Korobov or a Dervy, I mean it again shows your bias. We all have some bias in us, so it's whatever. But it's just strange that you say that they not only pass the eye test for you (that is understandable, although they have looked average every time they step up,and haven't even stepped to A level yet) but they also have done a lot as pros...(just isn't true).

Comment