Not saying you don’t know or follow the sport, but there are plenty of other people on here who do as well who don’t act like complete tools, is what I’m getting at I guess. And as far as ggg goes, you were hardly proven “right”, I mean the guy lost a close decision that many people thought should have gone the other way... and against a p4p level fighter in his prime, while he himself was 36. The aging fighter more often than not loses those type of fights convincingly. People who though ggg was gonna steam roll canelo are just dumb, but people who try to claim canelo “dominated” or “beat up” ggg, were just desperate for that to happen, so they hung their hat on the closest thing they could get to it.
Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Golovkin Trilogy Targeted For May 4, Says De La Hoya
Collapse
-
-
Golovkin had 3 fights with the two best rivals at the weight. 36 rounds against two younger good fighters while at an advanced age. Never floored or wobbled. Arguably wins at least 2 out of three fights all close ones. And this fool thinks thats a hype job whos "not about that life".. Mental illness is what it is.Not saying you don’t know or follow the sport, but there are plenty of other people on here who do as well who don’t act like complete tools, is what I’m getting at I guess. And as far as ggg goes, you were hardly proven “right”, I mean the guy lost a close decision that many people thought should have gone the other way... and against a p4p level fighter in his prime, while he himself was 36. The aging fighter more often than not loses those type of fights convincingly. People who though ggg was gonna steam roll canelo are just dumb, but people who try to claim canelo “dominated” or “beat up” ggg, were just desperate for that to happen, so they hung their hat on the closest thing they could get to it.Comment
-
But i dont care about Golovkin losing a fight, thats part of boxing. You wont find a single post of mine complaining about that or the decision in the rematch. So basically, every single reference to me that youve made doesnt apply. No, im more concerned that you respond to things that arent said or aren't there. So we have my slating Canelo, Ward, having an issue with Kovalev, Pacquiao, Matthyse and Golovkin losing which ive never once written anywhere, ever. So in fact all your complaints are fantasy. Think for a moment on that. Then think about this, a man who only stops fragile fighters, regularly failed to stop smaller men and hasn't got a stoppage at the weight hes fighting at, isnt a puncher. And so weve come full circle 😂
you are here crying uncontrollably for a reason, bltch
just saying
Golovkin getting spanked by the fat red kid looks to be the reason
Comment
-
Not saying you don’t know or follow the sport, but there are plenty of other people on here who do as well who don’t act like complete tools, is what I’m getting at I guess. And as far as ggg goes, you were hardly proven “right”, I mean the guy lost a close decision that many people thought should have gone the other way... and against a p4p level fighter in his prime, while he himself was 36. The aging fighter more often than not loses those type of fights convincingly. People who though ggg was gonna steam roll canelo are just dumb, but people who try to claim canelo “dominated” or “beat up” ggg, were just desperate for that to happen, so they hung their hat on the closest thing they could get to it.
yea, I'm a gun
I said this..... "Golovkin is over-rated"
people were believing all that "anyone from 154-168" rubbish..... people were calling him an ATG, and insisting that he could beat Ward
I was right

and btw.....
1) I could be just as right about any other fighter, and nobody would say a damn thing..... but the spastication is strong with that fanbase..... which is why guys are butthurt
2) I put up with their shlt, and had to listen to those clowns throwing BETTER PROVEN fighters under a bus FOR YEARS..... so yea, it may take more than a couple of months after Golovkin lost his titles for me to have enough fun to justify forgetting about the casuals and their golov-rubbish
just bear with me through these difficult times.....Last edited by aboutfkntime; 01-30-2019, 01:57 AM.Comment
-
Golovkin had 3 fights with the two best rivals at the weight. 36 rounds against two younger good fighters while at an advanced age. Never floored or wobbled. Arguably wins at least 2 out of three fights all close ones. And this fool thinks thats a hype job whos "not about that life".. Mental illness is what it is.
he is clearly a hypejob, and clearly not about that life
NO, not Charlo..... NO, not Derevyanchenko..... NO, not Saunders..... NO, it was obvious waaaaay before then
totally avoiding Cotto, is what gave the game away
every other fighter from 140-160 would cut off one of this fingers for that opportunity..... but Golovkin, he refused to even lift his little finger to make that fight
1) the ONLY difficult fight he walked into willingly, is Canelo..... and guess what..... now that he knows Canelo has his number, Golovkin is not interested in a trilogy fight loooool
2) he avoided PLENTY of dangerous/difficult opponents
1+2=3..... #notaboutthatlifeComment
-
Wheres the proof? Youve said alot but backed nothing up. I only said Canelo wasnt a puncher and you cried for a week. Now youve come back from your therapy weekend, you're crying again. Your not well, and calling names from the safety of your screen aint impressing nobodyComment
-
This is spot on.Not saying you don’t know or follow the sport, but there are plenty of other people on here who do as well who don’t act like complete tools, is what I’m getting at I guess. And as far as ggg goes, you were hardly proven “right”, I mean the guy lost a close decision that many people thought should have gone the other way... and against a p4p level fighter in his prime, while he himself was 36. The aging fighter more often than not loses those type of fights convincingly. People who though ggg was gonna steam roll canelo are just dumb, but people who try to claim canelo “dominated” or “beat up” ggg, were just desperate for that to happen, so they hung their hat on the closest thing they could get to it.
Canelo is a solid B+ fighter and a current PFP fighter...Top 5 on almost every list.
Even if you had Canelo winning both fights...they were 7-5 fights (I had both fights as they occurred - a draw and a narrow decision). That says a lot about the skill/talent of GGG.
It's a shame GGG wouldnt take the catchweights because he couldve legitimately won earlier in his career and received wider appreciation for his craft. Instead theres a lot of contradictions where he drug every potential opponent to 160 (including a 147 pound opponent who wanted a 157 catchweight...).
Canelo is no saint either. I do not believe - at all - that he intentionally used PEDs, but he did have PEDs in his system for a major fight where he couldve and should've been more careful regarding dietary choices. That criticism will never go away completely.
Similarly Canelo has never cleanly beaten a top opponent. He beat Lara, GGG, and Trout in decisions that could've gone either way. And I'm a HUGE Canelo fan...that's just the truth. For as much as I like Canelo he'll always just be a fun fighter who very distinct limitations. However, he does fight any and everyone and it's awesome seeing that during this era of Wilders, Thurmans, Porters, and Golovkins.Comment
-
That's a fair assessment. You could argue GGG won 18/36 rounds.Golovkin had 3 fights with the two best rivals at the weight. 36 rounds against two younger good fighters while at an advanced age. Never floored or wobbled. Arguably wins at least 2 out of three fights all close ones. And this fool thinks thats a hype job whos "not about that life".. Mental illness is what it is.
What bothers me is when Gennady stans say he got ROBBED and won 10-2 in both fights. The reality is if Gennady won they were 7-5 wins...just like for Canelo. People love to hate the face of boxing especially if hes tied to cheating, but the objective reality is Golovkin is a hell of a fighter. Sadly he turned pro too late to ever really factor as an ATG. His handlers possibly didnt know what they had or were incompetent.Comment
-
36 rounds with the best two fighters at hes weight at an advanced age for a middle. Thats 36 more than you. Hes a full time pro and your a full time troll. Youre not about any kind of life by the looks of it. You didnt just mention Billy Joe Pull out did you? Did you see how easily Andrade handled the guy who gave your hero life and death. All Billy does is fight Golovkin retreads and pull out at the last minute, like we all wish your father would've done..😂he is clearly a hypejob, and clearly not about that life
NO, not Charlo..... NO, not Derevyanchenko..... NO, not Saunders..... NO, it was obvious waaaaay before then
totally avoiding Cotto, is what gave the game away
every other fighter from 140-160 would cut off one of this fingers for that opportunity..... but Golovkin, he refused to even lift his little finger to make that fight
1) the ONLY difficult fight he walked into willingly, is Canelo..... and guess what..... now that he knows Canelo has his number, Golovkin is not interested in a trilogy fight loooool
2) he avoided PLENTY of dangerous/difficult opponents
1+2=3..... #notaboutthatlifeComment
-
A sensible post that i can and largely do agree with, other than the PEDs thing, which I think is naive to believe to be honest. Lets face it, not every mexican fighter is testing positive, if this problem was so well known i dont see how a huge money fight was nearly derailed over such an oversight. No,i believe sometimes some of these guys just slip up, covering up drugs is an art. Saunders said he knew Canelo was cheating, and thats because everyone in the came knows all the top guys are. Billy was doing it himself. But yes, I agree with you about some of the catch weight fights, although i feel the same way about Ward Dawson too. That couldve been a much better fight we were robbed of.This is spot on.
Canelo is a solid B+ fighter and a current PFP fighter...Top 5 on almost every list.
Even if you had Canelo winning both fights...they were 7-5 fights (I had both fights as they occurred - a draw and a narrow decision). That says a lot about the skill/talent of GGG.
It's a shame GGG wouldnt take the catchweights because he couldve legitimately won earlier in his career and received wider appreciation for his craft. Instead theres a lot of contradictions where he drug every potential opponent to 160 (including a 147 pound opponent who wanted a 157 catchweight...).
Canelo is no saint either. I do not believe - at all - that he intentionally used PEDs, but he did have PEDs in his system for a major fight where he couldve and should've been more careful regarding dietary choices. That criticism will never go away completely.
Similarly Canelo has never cleanly beaten a top opponent. He beat Lara, GGG, and Trout in decisions that could've gone either way. And I'm a HUGE Canelo fan...that's just the truth. For as much as I like Canelo he'll always just be a fun fighter who very distinct limitations. However, he does fight any and everyone and it's awesome seeing that during this era of Wilders, Thurmans, Porters, and Golovkins.Comment
Comment