Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Golovkin Trilogy Targeted For May 4, Says De La Hoya

[aboutfkntime]

Cool man. Really not even trying to be rude to you, but it is clear from your posts that you are a very low IQ self-hating person. I sincerely hope you get some help. This is what you do -

1) say really ****** stuff
2) call other people ****** when their points conflict with your low IQ biased analysis
3) you get called out for your poor grammar and spelling (******ity), and get asked why anyone should take such a simpleton seriously, who can't even spell or write past a 5th grade level?
4) you act like it's cool to be ******
5) repeat

It's just tiresome. You are just a complete waste of space. You bring no value to any area of life or conversation on here.

GGG is an ATG amateur, numerous awards, only a few losses, silver medal at the Olympics. As a pro, one of the highest KO percentages in MW history, one of longest reigning middleweight champs in history, fights people without regard for where the fight is, because he knows he is often good enough to finish the fight, and if not he will still clearly win.

15 good-great clear wins at MW on his resume. Should already be regarded as the greatest MW champ in history but because he is some random Asian/white dude from Kazakhstan who barely speaks English he gets nowhere near the credit he deserves.

The fact that you don't put Murray as one of his top 3 wins shows you have no idea what you're talking about. But then again you show that all the time. your IQ is roughly 80. You are borderline ******ed. I am not saying this to be mean, just letting you know that no one with any sense cares at all about what you say. Read a book, try and better yourself. Please use bias and biased in a sentence correctly before you respond to me again, Mr Beta's.

what a story-telling idiot

listen here, you fkn muppet..... it comes down to one thing, and one thing only.....

WHO did you beat, with consideration given to when/how

THAT IS IT !!..... nothing else matters

this is Golovkin's resume.....
Jacobs *
Lemieux

he beat no other world-class middleweights

so stop being so fkn ****** kid LMAO

if you think that Golovkin is the greatest middleweight of all time..... then you are an absolute fkn *****, of the very highest order

[aboutfkntime]

I dont remember debating Golovkins power, we were talking about Canelo. I said hes not a puncher. I think we both know what a puncher is, and Canelo isn't one. Hes never stopped a good fighter at middle and has only stopped fragile men in recent years. Sure, he backed the old guy up, but he never looked like stopping him, even in your dreams lol.

Canelo has plenty of power

enough to make the supposed Mexican killer turn timid

[R.KHLMS4LIFE]

Hopefully they put Jacobs vs Charlo on the undercard gives those fighters exposure they need to gain popularity also a huge check say 3m Jacobs 2m Charlo. Plus if that is the co main event it'd help sales a little and interest in the fight card

[Boxing-1013]

what a story-telling idiot

listen here, you fkn muppet..... it comes down to one thing, and one thing only.....

WHO did you beat, with consideration given to when/how

THAT IS IT !!..... nothing else matters

this is Golovkin's resume.....
Jacobs *
Lemieux

he beat no other world-class middleweights

so stop being so fkn ****** kid LMAO

if you think that Golovkin is the greatest middleweight of all time..... then you are an absolute fkn *****, of the very highest order

Use bias and biased in a sentence next time you speak to me, Mr Beta's

[aboutfkntime]

Use bias and biased in a sentence next time you speak to me, Mr Beta's

tell us again how Golovkin is the greatest middleweight of all time..... you corny gimp

[aboutfkntime]

Use bias and biased in a sentence next time you speak to me, Mr Beta's

so..... the guy who is running around calling Plodkin the greatest middleweight of all time..... is calling ME biased?

oh lordie

[Boxing-1013]

so..... the guy who is running around calling Plodkin the greatest middleweight of all time..... is calling ME biased?

oh lordie

Hey you actually used one of them correctly!!! Cong**** man I am actually really happy for you.

All you have to do is objectively look at the resumes of his and his competitors for that throne. Great as Hagler was he got embarrassed by Leonard, almost beat and taken 15 rounds by an old fat Duran, and had two great wins against Hearns and Mugabe. And Mugabe never really beat anyone himself although he certainly passed the eye test. Hagler also lost twice to Willie Monroe, a nobody. He was steamrolling the likes of Alan Minter to get his titles.

GGG beat Canelo twice and Jacobs and KOd Vanes, Brook, Lemieux, Monroe Jr, Murray, Rubio, Geale, Adama, Stevens, Macklin, Ishida, Rosado, Proksa, and Ouma. All really good or great fighters and all in their prime. All different styles. Hagler struggled mightily against anyone who was tough and could box and move, as he showed against Monroe Sr twice, Duran and Leonard. He should have steamrolled in all 4 of those fights but couldn't. GGG has been in there against all different styles and no one has ever really had any success against him. GGG deserves much more credit.

Unless you care to respond with an actual analysis of GGG's career or specifically why he doesn't stack up against the great MWs of all time, please save your time. You will soon be blocked anyway, you're a complete waste of time.

[aboutfkntime]

Hey you actually used one of them correctly!!! Cong**** man I am actually really happy for you.

All you have to do is objectively look at the resumes of his and his competitors for that throne. Great as Hagler was he got embarrassed by Leonard, almost beat and taken 15 rounds by an old fat Duran, and had two great wins against Hearns and Mugabe. And Mugabe never really beat anyone himself although he certainly passed the eye test. Hagler also lost twice to Willie Monroe, a nobody. He was steamrolling the likes of Alan Minter to get his titles.

GGG beat Canelo twice and Jacobs and KOd Vanes, Brook, Lemieux, Monroe Jr, Murray, Rubio, Geale, Adama, Stevens, Macklin, Ishida, Rosado, Proksa, and Ouma. All really good or great fighters and all in their prime. All different styles. Hagler struggled mightily against anyone who was tough and could box and move, as he showed against Monroe Sr twice, Duran and Leonard. He should have steamrolled in all 4 of those fights but couldn't. GGG has been in there against all different styles and no one has ever really had any success against him. GGG deserves much more credit.

Unless you care to respond with an actual analysis of GGG's career or specifically why he doesn't stack up against the great MWs of all time, please save your time. You will soon be blocked anyway, you're a complete waste of time.

wow, that sure was a big shltty post !

gratz lol

1) I already summed up Golovkin's career

Jacobs *
Lemieux

that's it !

it comes down to..... WHO did you beat, with consideration given to when/how..... and nobody else on his shltty resume matters

2) FACT: Golovkin did not beat Canelo 2x, you absolute muppet..... he lost that fight, no question..... pushing out a few pitty-pat jabs while you are getting backed up and beaten up is not how to win a professional boxing match

2 things.....

you are going to be crying your eyes out after the third fight

stop comparing Golovkin to Hagler you muppet..... Matthew Hilton was better than Golovkin, and would probably have beaten him

Hagler would not have ducked Derevyanchenko

oh, and neither would Matthew Hilton

[Boxing-1013]

wow, that sure was a big shltty post !

gratz lol

1) I already summed up Golovkin's career

Jacobs *
Lemieux

that's it !

it comes down to..... WHO did you beat, with consideration given to when/how..... and nobody else on his shltty resume matters

2) FACT: Golovkin did not beat Canelo 2x, you absolute muppet..... he lost that fight, no question..... pushing out a few pitty-pat jabs while you are getting backed up and beaten up is not how to win a professional boxing match

2 things.....

you are going to be crying your eyes out after the third fight

stop comparing Golovkin to Hagler you muppet..... Matthew Hilton was better than Golovkin, and would probably have beaten him

Hagler would not have ducked Derevyanchenko

oh, and neither would Matthew Hilton

Man I don't really care at all who wins the 3rd fight. GGG won the first two quite clearly in my and most people's eyes, and a 3rd fight will get him paid another $20 million. Probably will make 50-60 million off these 3 fights. As long as he and Canelo come out relatively healthy I'll be relatively happy after the fight either way.

[MPDKSAB]

Thanks for your post. I agree with some of what you said. But anyone who says Jacobs beat GGG should just not be taken seriously imo. I think it is pretty clear you have some bias there. GGG was the champ, KD Jacobs, hurt him a couple other times, was never hurt. And outlanded Jacobs 9-2-1 in punch stats. Anyone saying Jacobs did anything but survive against GGG is just not very good at objectively analyzing things imo.

Also I like Andrade. But he went life and death with Jack Culcay. 160 Charlo went 12 hard rounds with Trout and Korobov. Jacobs went 12 hard rounds with Sulecki. Anyone putting those 3 guys at the top of 160 right now is completely unjustified based on their resumes.

You could argue it based on the eye test/matchups/current form, but thus far none of them have done nearly enough to deserve a real spot above GGG or Canelo. And Andrade and Charlo do not deserve to be above BJS or really even guys like Korobov or Dervy or even Lemieux. They have done almost nothing at 160 or frankly much at all so far in their careers.

I don't understand how I'm biased. I normally give at least 1 swing round to the person I didn't pick going in. I guess Canelo shouldn't be taken seriously either cause he also thought Jacobs won. I don't remember GGG unequivocally hurting Jacobs. I believe more people felt Jacobs won vs GGG than Canelo & he fought him twice.

People place Errol Spence ahead of Thurman but Thurman has better wins. It means nothing. It's just my opinion on who's the best. Like if they actually fight. Of course my list is different if we're talking status & accolades in the division. If you watch the Andrade/Culcay fight you can clearly see Andrade was off. I said during the fight live, this is not the Andrade I'm used to seeing & this was round 5 or 6. Culcay did nothing impressive. Culcay didn’t impress Andrade just underperformed. Andrade was sick & had no legs according to him, they fought in Germany, remember.

The part I bolded in the last paragraph is troll worthy. Korobov & Derevyanchenko c'mon man.. isn't the reason Canelo & GGG in your top 3, cause of their accolades? That's contradictory, Korobov & Derevyanchenko have zero professional accolades..