Comments Thread For: Whyte: Wilder Has No Boxing IQ, I'd Definitely KO Tyson Fury

[Noelanthony]

Anthony, I have a lot of respect for you but in most cases you are not going to take the champion's title away if you don't throw enough punches. Fury fell in a habit of not getting hit and running out the clock while playing keep away.

He had to punish Deontay Wilder and beat him up in order to justify winning the title from him. The bottom line on the three judges scorecards, he just didn't do enough to take the champion's title away.

They official three judges came away unimpressed by Fury's ring generalship.

Well just one to be fair and he was considered by all including Wilder fans to be corrupt. The other judge scored it to fury and the other judge scored it a draw

[champion4ever]

Well just one to be fair and he was considered by all including Wilder fans to be corrupt. The other judge scored it to fury and the other judge scored it a draw

In my judgement, the fight was close. It was far from dominating or shut out performance by Fury. There were a lot of close rounds and many rounds that were to close to score.

The judge that scored the fight a draw should be considered the corrupt one and he just so happens to be British. Had he scored the fight for Fury then Tyson would have walked away the night as the new WBC heavyweight champion by way of split decision.

Fury was sold out by his own countryman. He requested neutral judges and he received them. There's no need to call then corrupt now. This is what he wanted. The fight should have convened in Las Vegas; Not Los Angeles but it was what he wanted and as the old saying goes "Be careful what you ask for, because you just might receive it".

[Falkano]

In my judgement, the fight was close. It was far from dominating or shut out performance by Fury. There were a lot of close rounds and many rounds that were to close to score.

The judge that scored the fight a draw should be considered the corrupt one and he just so happens to be British. Had he scored the fight for Fury then Tyson would have walked away the night as the new WBC heavyweight champion by way of split decision.

Fury was sold out by his own countryman. He requested neutral judges and he received them. There's no need to call then corrupt now. This is what he wanted. The fight should have convened in Las Vegas; Not Los Angeles but it was what he wanted and as the old saying goes "Be careful what you ask for, because you just might receive it".

Possibly the biggest load of rubbish I have ever read on here and that is going some.

Only one person in the world (other than you) thought Wilder won. Nobody of importance thought that.
The Brit had the fight as a draw. But without the two knockdowns he had Fury winning. At no point did 2 judges have Wilder winning.

The Mexican judge who has been quite frankly thrown under a bus by the boxing community, and rightly so. Had Wilder winning even without the knockdowns. That is what is called corrupt.

Previously you talk about work rate, and punches thrown. That means nothing at all in a boxing match. What matters is if you get hit or not. They don't score amateur fights on how many punches you have thrown so why should the pros be any different? If you are in there throwing 300 punches a round and don't land any because your opponent is dodging them and using skill to avoid them what is more impressive? Mayweather made a career out of that and many consider him one of the all time greats.
But if an over-weight, coke head who binged on junk and drink for 2 years does that it is considered crap? That is what you are saying.

The other thing you seem to never mention is Fury actually landed more shots than Wilder. Sure they are not super power punches that will take your head off but the sport is called 'boxing'. Not 'power punch'.

To try and imply the guy who gave him the draw was corrupt is pathetic and just shows you don't actually know anything about boxing. Just how to ride Wilders nut sack.

[Noelanthony]

In my judgement, the fight was close. It was far from dominating or shut out performance by Fury. There were a lot of close rounds and many rounds that were to close to score.

The judge that scored the fight a draw should be considered the corrupt one and he just so happens to be British. Had he scored the fight for Fury then Tyson would have walked away the night as the new WBC heavyweight champion by way of split decision.

Fury was sold out by his own countryman. He requested neutral judges and he received them. There's no need to call then corrupt now. This is what he wanted. The fight should have convened in Las Vegas; Not Los Angeles but it was what he wanted and as the old saying goes "Be careful what you ask for, because you just might receive it".

No I referred to the judge that Scored Wilder winning 115-111 as corrupt. The British judge was obviously the most unbiased. In any case it doesn’t matter now. It was a great fight

[champion4ever]

No I referred to the judge that Scored Wilder winning 115-111 as corrupt. The British judge was obviously the most unbiased. In any case it doesn’t matter now. It was a great fight

Now you are not trolling me on various alt. accounts are you Anthony? I thought the previous poster was you. No, I am only joking.

However, the judge who scored that fight for Wilder, scored it how he saw it. 115-113 Wilder minus the two knockdowns. It's equivalent of the British judge who scored it 115-113 Fury minus the two knockdowns.

Both of those judges were only a swing round apart from each other. One scored a round that they thought Fury won while the other scored a round where they thought Wilder won.

It was a close fight where I personally believed that Fury barely eked it out. No it wasn't a shut out, robbery or a dominating performance by him. I thought he did just enough to win.

However, I don't have a problem with some other scorecard which was very similar to mine, scoring it by a swing round or two for Deontay Wilder.

[champion4ever]

Possibly the biggest load of rubbish I have ever read on here and that is going some.

Only one person in the world (other than you) thought Wilder won. Nobody of importance thought that.
The Brit had the fight as a draw. But without the two knockdowns he had Fury winning. At no point did 2 judges have Wilder winning.

The Mexican judge who has been quite frankly thrown under a bus by the boxing community, and rightly so. Had Wilder winning even without the knockdowns. That is what is called corrupt.

Previously you talk about work rate, and punches thrown. That means nothing at all in a boxing match. What matters is if you get hit or not. They don't score amateur fights on how many punches you have thrown so why should the pros be any different? If you are in there throwing 300 punches a round and don't land any because your opponent is dodging them and using skill to avoid them what is more impressive? Mayweather made a career out of that and many consider him one of the all time greats.
But if an over-weight, coke head who binged on junk and drink for 2 years does that it is considered crap? That is what you are saying.

The other thing you seem to never mention is Fury actually landed more shots than Wilder. Sure they are not super power punches that will take your head off but the sport is called 'boxing'. Not 'power punch'.

To try and imply the guy who gave him the draw was corrupt is pathetic and just shows you don't actually know anything about boxing. Just how to ride Wilders nut sack.

Anthony, you sure this is not you?

[Ake-Dawg]

Doesn’t need to add up this is not maths. However, I will break it down when you look at all 40 fights he hasn’t fought anyone of note. However, that not entirely true he fought Ortiz who had some Fire power and very nearly knocked him out. Albeit I’m glad you are around to police ,posts

I expect high level trash talk from you!

[champion4ever]

Possibly the biggest load of rubbish I have ever read on here and that is going some.

Only one person in the world (other than you) thought Wilder won. Nobody of importance thought that.
The Brit had the fight as a draw. But without the two knockdowns he had Fury winning. At no point did 2 judges have Wilder winning.

The Mexican judge who has been quite frankly thrown under a bus by the boxing community, and rightly so. Had Wilder winning even without the knockdowns. That is what is called corrupt.

Previously you talk about work rate, and punches thrown. That means nothing at all in a boxing match. What matters is if you get hit or not. They don't score amateur fights on how many punches you have thrown so why should the pros be any different? If you are in there throwing 300 punches a round and don't land any because your opponent is dodging them and using skill to avoid them what is more impressive? Mayweather made a career out of that and many consider him one of the all time greats.
But if an over-weight, coke head who binged on junk and drink for 2 years does that it is considered crap? That is what you are saying.

The other thing you seem to never mention is Fury actually landed more shots than Wilder. Sure they are not super power punches that will take your head off but the sport is called 'boxing'. Not 'power punch'.

To try and imply the guy who gave him the draw was corrupt is pathetic and just shows you don't actually know anything about boxing. Just how to ride Wilders nut sack.

I must have a hit nerve with you; An overemotional Brit. If Fury dominated like you said he did then the British judge would have had him winning 119-109 minus the two knockdowns. That would have made the score 117-109.

[Phenom]

Whyte is like the British zelenoff I swear they are hyping him up just for laughs

[Noelanthony]

I expect high level trash talk from you!

I will not let you down. I’m waiting to pounce on the next Wilderlite that mentions 50 million for Wilder facing Breazeale in Alabama in March