Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Whyte: Wilder Has No Boxing IQ, I'd Definitely KO Tyson Fury

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Sweet_Science2 View Post
    Just like the pussie you are. Instead of taking the bet you would say anything but I bet Fury beats Wilder. Shut your f@ggot ass up like I said..

    Until you grow some nuts sit your bytch ass in the corner before I smack the shyt out you pussie
    Oh boy learn to read and don’t come on like a ****** trying hard to prove a stooped point which is really pointless. If I wanted to bet which I do, when the time of the fight comes I would bet on the few online betting sites available...making bets with a deluded stranger isn’t worth my time, now crawl under the ****** sand you came from you dosser!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Jax teller View Post
      The same one that he was missing for the rest of the fight and struggled to land on the likes of Spzilka? Still doesn't change the fact that he pumps his arm back and swings the right half way around the world before it reaches, Whytes slipped less obvious punches and will get plenty of oportunities to land his own left hook.

      Wilder is too lacking too shut him out especially if Whyte gets on the inside.
      Both Fury and Spzilka (and Washington to an extent) used a lot of movement and a defensive posture to avoid those punches. Whyte is not capable of fighting that style and if he tried he would gas out. Whyte is also not long enough to bother Wilder with a quick jab like Fury. As is the case with any fighter, the moment you try and plant your feet to land anything hard against Wilder you open yourself up to getting caught. Whyte does not possess enough movement in his upper body to not get caught by a right hand behind his guard. Could he potentially land his left hook? Sure, but its not likely.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Bonduu View Post
        Oh boy learn to read and don’t come on like a ****** trying hard to prove a stooped point which is really pointless. If I wanted to bet which I do, when the time of the fight comes I would bet on the few online betting sites available...making bets with a deluded stranger isn’t worth my time, now crawl under the ****** sand you came from you dosser!

        We can set the bet up now stop being a pussie. Me and another poster already have a bet in motion so when the fight is announced we seal the deal.

        Do YOU WANT TO BET PUSSIE? If not shut your bytch ass up and sit in the corner before I smack the shyt out you

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
          Both Fury and Spzilka (and Washington to an extent) used a lot of movement and a defensive posture to avoid those punches. Whyte is not capable of fighting that style and if he tried he would gas out. Whyte is also not long enough to bother Wilder with a quick jab like Fury. As is the case with any fighter, the moment you try and plant your feet to land anything hard against Wilder you open yourself up to getting caught. Whyte does not possess enough movement in his upper body to not get caught by a right hand behind his guard. Could he potentially land his left hook? Sure, but its not likely.
          Alot of this is transferrable to Wilder especially in comparison to Parker who is just as elusive as Spzilka and definitely Washington and as a guy who was never downed until Whyte, even in amateurs, chances are he has a better chin than Wilders as well who has been KO'd.

          The crux of my argument is Wilder can not slip punches like any of the mentioned fighters or even Whyte himself or box well enough to keep him at range, I think this is a generally accepted. Therefore Whyte doesn't need to slip punches for whole fight if he imposed his weight advantage, shortens the range and bullies Wilder into an early finish.

          I'm not even trolling Wilder will be favourite, just pointing out my logic that Wilder v Whyte isn't a shut out at all, especially as they both have a take one to land one approach.

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP