Does it mean losing? Because every fighter has lost. Whether it was a legit lose or a questionable win. All of them. All the greats many times the L came from lesser opposition.
This is boxing bumps and bruises. Wins and loses.
Many times a good fighter loses there are other factors that come in to play. Personal problems, injuries, off nights, bad match up or even there opponent was on some PED. Being a bum, hype job or exposed is hardly the reason. Can you imagine writing pacquiao off as a hype job after his first loss. Or Ali, or maweather after Castillo 1. You would have missed out on great careers. Let's stop downing a fighter for Losing and maybe start giving credit to the guy that won. Every fighter has lost and the your flavor of the month is going to too.
I'm not sure the people using the term "exposed" know what it means. Wilder for example. Wider is the kimbo slice of boxing. He can't get exposed. If anything wilder is exposing the heavy weight division. A back alley fighter koing actual boxers. Because let's be real. EVERYBODY that Wilder has beat is better than wilder.
Sure this will fall on deaf ears, but by you claiming every boxer that loses is "exposed" then you're sayin they lost to a "bum". If that's the case then every fighter sucks and boxing is a horrible sport.
Can you imagine you not getting a job after a interview and some one comes in the parking lot calling you "exposed" and picking apart your resume.
You win some you lose some. The Saying used to be, "it's not how you fall it's how you get back up". Well now it seems you can't lose a fcking round. Let's get it together.
Great post. Good points made. Funny you mentioned Wilder. Before the fight a lot of posters were calling him out because he has numerous flaws. Everybody knew he had them prior to the fight. After the aforementioned critics were running around telling everyone he was exposed. IMO even with those flaws he either got a draw or won by one point.
Whos he beat? He sc****d past a shopworn trout and got booed when the decision was announced. As far as im concerned his limitations were exposed against korobov and hes not the fighter his fans were hyping him to be.
No hurd fought the "shopworn Trout." You dudes make pretend of who is & aint in their prime ALL the time like how you fools do it with T.B.E. when he is 40 years old you say he should fight D.Wilder & shet. FOH
He wasn’t training for an important 12 round fight at 160.
Are all fights not important? Then with this logic maybe charlo under performed because he viewed his opponent as unimportant there fore underestimating him.
Maybe the fact Charlos training camp was geared towards another opponent threw off his game plan.
Comment