Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
Something like this seems very reasonable but every side has their right to disagree and that's what happened here. I get it was due to not being in the main contract but it was reasonable request that was rejected regardless.
http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/i...pacquaio-fight
I don't think you are understanding what happened here.
It's not like Mayweather just drew up a contract that was a bunch of crazy demands that were all his idea, signed it, and then said, Well, I signed it. You didn't.
Dude. The contract was negotiated by both parties. Pacquiao had agreed to the terms. That's the reason the contract was signed off on and sent out.
This might help you to completely understand:
So you are giving false information when you say Pacquiao didn't agree. There was nothing in the contract that he didn't agree with. He disagreed with the framework for drug testing, which you have gone on record above saying that it was a fair offer.
So now that you know the terms of the contract were negotiated and agreed to by both parties, and know that Pacquaio bailed due to what even you said was a fair framework for drug testing, I guess that means you agree with what I've been saying...?
It's not like Mayweather just drew up a contract that was a bunch of crazy demands that were all his idea, signed it, and then said, Well, I signed it. You didn't.
Dude. The contract was negotiated by both parties. Pacquiao had agreed to the terms. That's the reason the contract was signed off on and sent out.
This might help you to completely understand:
So you are giving false information when you say Pacquiao didn't agree. There was nothing in the contract that he didn't agree with. He disagreed with the framework for drug testing, which you have gone on record above saying that it was a fair offer.
So now that you know the terms of the contract were negotiated and agreed to by both parties, and know that Pacquaio bailed due to what even you said was a fair framework for drug testing, I guess that means you agree with what I've been saying...?
"But Mayweather's promoter, Richard Schaefer, said all other issues have been agreed upon. "The good news is we have agreed on all the other points," Schaefer said. "Depending on what Manny Pacquiao decides to do we either have a fight or we don't have a fight."
Schaefer said he is still hopeful of the fight happening, based on the fact Pacquiao himself has not publicly said he would not accept blood-testing. "I am still hopeful because I really believe this decision didn't come from Manny Pacquiao, it came from somebody else," Schaefer said. "It's up to Manny Pacquiao to prove me right or wrong."
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...-blood-testing
Schaefer said he is still hopeful of the fight happening, based on the fact Pacquiao himself has not publicly said he would not accept blood-testing. "I am still hopeful because I really believe this decision didn't come from Manny Pacquiao, it came from somebody else," Schaefer said. "It's up to Manny Pacquiao to prove me right or wrong."
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...-blood-testing
Comment