Comments Thread For: Joshua: I'm Hungry To Be Undisputed - So I am Begging Wilder

[Froch_uppercut]

[QUOTE=BellicoseOne;19366963]

I noticed you didn't dispute any of the points I made.
Hope you enjoyed the Vargas - Salido fight....you're welcome!
What's really sad is that you assume I'm American and a Wilder fan as I don't agree with you.
Good gag with 'bong squat' gag though!
You almost redeemed yourself...

It's pretty obvious that your'e American, as you're ******

[Laligalaliga]

IF he’s such a bum slayer then why don’t AJ one up Wilder and try to get him outta there quicker than 10 rounds!?

He already did that with Molina, so what’s with the excuses with Ortiz?

Wasn’t there a UK poll for fans of who they rather see AJ fight and the poll winner was Ortiz easily!

You must’ve been that 14% that picked a Whyte rematch or Chisora!

Face it, AJ is trying to save face because more and more people are waking up to his BS and that he’s a coward that listens to whatever his masta Edwards Hearns says!

You UK guys gotta stop, the truth is out there!

Wilder vs Fury 2 or Joshua vs Whyte 2/Chisora/Miller/Usyk

AJ loses credibility everyday now!

You worry so much. When did you start routing for Ortiz? Cos he was KOed on his first step up by wilder?

Ortiz wi" be a warm up fight for AJ, get blasted inside 6.
Easy work.

[Noelanthony]

Well said. Although plenty of us UK fans know the truth. Joshua is being exposed in this country too. Only Matchroom fanboys are defending him and even they are tying themselves in knots and being confused by Hearn's lies too.

What the hell are you talking about?

https://goo.gl/images/oDXHkp

[Jax teller]

I know what Hearn and Finkel said to each other. I've seen the emails. The broadcaster was never going to be an issue. Sky wanted the fight and would have gladly matched BT's offer.

Lolololol, Warren is that you?

Do share the emails with us if you're telling the truth.

[GGG Gloveking]

If someone sends an offer then the offer was actually sent and is real. Anyone can send an offer.

Now if there's any intention to actually go through with the offer is a different matter, how would anyone know that until it happens?

Let's try this again. Define real, then define fake.

Or do you seriously fail to grasp the English language to the point that you think something is real, even without real intent?

It seems like you'd rather redefine the English language than admit that the offer was real, you know, legitimate, genuine, authentic, honest.

[Robbie Barrett]

Let's try this again. Define real, then define fake.

Or do you seriously fail to grasp the English language to the point that you think something is real, even without real intent?

It seems like you'd rather redefine the English language than admit that the offer was real, you know, legitimate, genuine, authentic, honest.

real1
/riːl/Submit
adjective
1.
actually existing as a thing or occurring in fact; not imagined or supposed.
"Julius Caesar was a real person"
synonyms: actual, existent, non-fictional, non-fictitious, factual; More
2.

It's you that doesn't understand English.

If i make you an offer, the offer is real it exists.

That doesn't mean i want or will stand behind it if you accept.

It's not hard.

[GGG Gloveking]

It's you that doesn't understand English.

If i make you an offer, the offer is real it exists.

That doesn't mean i want or will stand behind it if you accept.

It's not hard.

Is a lie real in your world? Because in my world, the two terms don't mutually coexist. Something cannot be real, valid, genuine, honest, authentic, and be a lie, fake, fraudulent, dishonest at the same time.

Either the offer was real, or the offer was a lie. It can't be both at the same time. So which is it? Was the offer real, or was it a lie?

[GGG Gloveking]

real1
/riːl/Submit
adjective
1.
actually existing as a thing or occurring in fact; not imagined or supposed.
"Julius Caesar was a real person"
synonyms: actual, existent, non-fictional, non-fictitious, factual; More
2.

It's you that doesn't understand English.

If i make you an offer, the offer is real it exists.

That doesn't mean i want or will stand behind it if you accept.

It's not hard.

"Actually existing as a thing"... Did the $50M Actually exist as a thing? If not, the offer wasn't real by the definition you've provided.

Was the $50M "actual, existent, non- fictional"?

[Robbie Barrett]

Is a lie real in your world? Because in my world, the two terms don't mutually coexist. Something cannot be real, valid, genuine, honest, authentic, and be a lie, fake, fraudulent, dishonest at the same time.

Either the offer was real, or the offer was a lie. It can't be both at the same time. So which is it? Was the offer real, or was it a lie?

You're ******.

I'll give you 20 mil if you get your account banned.


The offer is real, it exists.



But i'm lying i won't actually give you 20 mil.

[Jax teller]

Let's try this again. Define real, then define fake.

Or do you seriously fail to grasp the English language to the point that you think something is real, even without real intent?

It seems like you'd rather redefine the English language than admit that the offer was real, you know, legitimate, genuine, authentic, honest.

It's pretty obvious what poster is trying to say.

Wilders team were good for the money but had no intention of parting with it, in other words the offer was insincere.