Originally posted by MrShakeAndBake
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Canelo Tells Golovkin To Be a Man: Accept That Loss!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by filup79 View PostI cancelled right away. Don't plan on resubscribing anytime soon. DAZN is garbage, I don't care if its $10. I cancelled ESPN+ after 1 month and it's half the price with way more content. I'm happy to pay for Spotify, Prime Netflix and Showtime because I actually get to watch things I want to see anytime I want. DAZN has nothing, some garbage fights on for a few hours a month and that is it. The WBSS is ok but its nothing to scream about. There is hardcores that like DAZN but I don't see them getting many subscribers to continue to keep and pay for the service monthly after a free trial. There has yet to be any buzz anywhere to any of their fights on DAZN, this Canelo included.
Dazn has been worth it for me, I like the WBSS and they Have some good talent fighting on there now exclusively in Canelo, Andrade, Joshua, and most likely Jacobs and GGG. Even if all they gave me all year was a round robin of those 4, it would be worth the money.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostI haven't heard him complain at all about it. Maybe I missed it? Canelo cried after the first fight that he was robbed when nobody thought he won.
Canelo has received more than one gift decisions and we know why. He doesn't play on a level playing field everybody knows that so him saying "just accept it because I am well connected" is funny. He's just paranoid because the majority feel he lost both fights.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jsmooth9876 View PostYeah, of course 100k doesn't but think about worldwide. I'm taking just a percentage of people who paid for Canelo against bums, not even people who paid vs GGG or Chavez jr. Add in other countries and then you have a big number.
I'm guessing they still show the Canelo fights in mexico on television for free, if they didn't, they'd probably get a million subscriptions just there alone.
Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment