Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Joshua Will Be Ringside, Scouting The Whyte-Chisora Rematch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by BeLikeWater View Post
    Bottom line, Wilder made much more for less risk fighting fury, millions more.

    He surpassed AJs softboi offer on the first try and is set to eclipse AJ to the point that people will start seriously questioning that softbois guts. Regardless of the rematch outcome, one thing remains true. Both wilder and fury will command much higher revenues from future fights than AJ.

    Hearn knows this, that's why he is on his PR tirade trying desperately to keep softboi AJs perceived image from disintegrating.
    Wilder didn't make more than 15 Mill though. So that load of nonsense goes out of the window.

    Wilder said Fury was better and tougher. Are you saying you know Wilder's mind better than he does?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
      If money isn't the problem, why didn't Wilder take the 15 Mill that was more than he earned for Fury? Wilder and his crazy fans have been exposed. Why else would Wilder's fans be calling for Wilder to get more money than his worth even though they won't be seeing a penny of it? The only reason people talk about the money is due to Wilder and his nutjob fans constantly thinking he's worth more, when he clearly isn't. That's why people talk about the money all the time. If Wilder would just take the offer we'd have a fight on out hands. But no, Wilder and his fans don't really want it. They'd rather just smear AJ at arms length instead.


      FACT: they offered Joseph Parker 32.5%..... because they actually wanted to fight Joseph Parker

      FACT: they low-balled Deontay Wilder a flat-fee offer and totally refused to give him a split..... despite the fact that Hearn later inadvertently admitted that Wilder was worth 35%..... because they did not want to fight ******* ******.....

      I will let you fill in the rest

      kid..... would it be easier for you to continue ignoring the obvious if I made the answer multi-choice?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
        Wilder didn't make more than 15 Mill though. So that load of nonsense goes out of the window.

        Wilder said Fury was better and tougher. Are you saying you know Wilder's mind better than he does?
        Ok fury is better than AJ, a beltholder. Does that mean u agree AJ is a softboi? Because at this point, the world also agrees

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
          Hearn is offering Wilder 35% for the fight in April. But guess what? They don't want to know. The 15 Mill offer was more than Wilder earned against Fury in a fight Wilder said was bigger. Care to explain this?


          genius.....

          if Wilder is worth 35%, then that earlier offer was a.....?

          HINT: it rhymes with snowball

          care to explain that ?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
            So I don't want to see AJ get spanked by Ortiz, but you agree with me that Joshua beats Ortiz? Are you alright? You're all over the place.

            How can AJ get Wilder into the ring if they're not interested? Finkle hasn't taken the offer so what do you suppose AJ and Hearn do? They can't force him into the ring.



            what offer..... link ?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Toffee View Post
              Wilder is incredibly lucky to have this work out for him. If the cards had gone against him, he'd be out of the equation. Limited ability, no belt, known only for losing to Fury.

              I don't think you can call it a masterstroke, unless his team had the cards written out before the fight (granted that may have happened!).
              You gotta gamble big to win big. Right now, he is in pole position for a big money fight.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
                You think you being proved wrong was a nonsense point? As opposed to you lying? That was a good point?

                Don't call someone a cheerleader on a forum when you're making lying, poisonous posts to smear someone who doesn't deserve it. People like you should be stamped on until you lose consciousness. "Fans" like you make me sick.
                I am not lying. You are still proving my point and I am not the only one. Thank you for your wishes you want about the people stampeding me until I am in blank, I hope your wishes come true, If that make you feel good with yourself. The one who is portraying the blind fan is you. Please look all your post you are making to several people in this site and in this same article and make conscience who is the sick fan, go, take a look. I am not going to babysit you making a copy paste to all those post for you to look. OH! and the one who is really lying is Eddie Hearns. That man is worst than a poisonous snake and have a silver tongue. Like I said, he going to offer peanuts to Wilder and when Wilder not accept, he going to said Wilder ducked Joshua and make the Dillian Whyte vs Joshua 2, If Whyte win. People are seeing this scenario and only Joshua followers are not seeing this. Wilder vs Tyson Fury 2 is the fight people want and is the hot topic. I have not problem with Joshua vs Wilder, I want this fight bad, but Eddie Hearns don't help with his low ball offers.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  FACT: they offered Joseph Parker 32.5%..... because they actually wanted to fight Joseph Parker

                  FACT: they low-balled Deontay Wilder a flat-fee offer and totally refused to give him a split..... despite the fact that Hearn later inadvertently admitted that Wilder was worth 35%..... because they did not want to fight ******* ******.....

                  I will let you fill in the rest

                  kid..... would it be easier for you to continue ignoring the obvious if I made the answer multi-choice?
                  It doesn't matter what anyone in the past got. All that matters is Wilder was offered more money than he got for the Fury fight. A fight Wilder said was tougher and bigger. It was beneath him that kind of money. Crackhead money is what he called it. So why did this hypocrite coward take less than "Crackhead" money then?

                  It doesn't matter if the facts are too much for you. You're just going to have to accept them and move on. But no, you want to argue a point that exposes Deontay. Ha.

                  Hearn is offering Wilder 35% you fool. Wilder and Finkle are not interested.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by BeLikeWater View Post
                    Ok fury is better than AJ, a beltholder. Does that mean u agree AJ is a softboi? Because at this point, the world also agrees
                    I never said Fury was better or that I agree with Wilder. I'm just telling you what he said.

                    AJ is going to punish both of them when he gets his hands on the cowards. They can't run forever.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
                      We're not talking about what Wilder will or will not earn in future. We're talking about Wilder calling it crackhead money but took less against Fury. No matter how you want to spin it, you and Wilder have been exposed. If that amount of money was beneath him, he wouldn't have taken the Fury fight either. But he did didn't he? You and Wilder deserve each other. Both dishonest scum.
                      Is this the part where you try and take old insignificant quotes and try and apply them to today for the sake of dragging an old argument into todays stratosphere. No thank you.

                      I guess since we are here, in today where Hearn has to acknowledge that Wilder has a bigger name, more negotiating power, and options for a big fight with Fury, you'd rather try and spark a raggedy azz convo about an old quote than to simply acknowledge....

                      If Joshua fights anybody but Wilder, Fury, or Ortiz in April, he will have proven himself to be a domestic prize fighter who simply puts on shows in his home country against soft touches. Sure he makes a lot of money for it, and I'm not mad at that. But in no way shape or form does he or any of his fans get to continue to claim he is the best when he consistently fights weaker fighters who pose no danger of him losing or being challenged.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP