Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

talking to casuals about boxing is hilarious

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    yeap, half the people, the other half in this forum just have a complex....

    Larry's thread is about causals, but some idiots want to spin the thing around.

    Acomplejados!

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by BM dnobagaV View Post
      Fury is a poor-mans Sammy Scaff.

      There I said it.
      Sammy Stash!

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
        the way a casual comes across to an internet fan is how an internet fan comes across to professional.

        i understand exactly the feeling you're describing. it's how robbie barrett, sidknee, lalagalagalaga, etc come across to me.
        How do you think you come across to everyone? You're a pathological liar on here and most know it .

        Comment


        • #34
          Yea they think boxing is swinging haymakers like a ToughMan Contest. When you try to explain the science of boxing it's like a Professor explaining Physics to a 1st grader

          Comment


          • #35
            Mike Tyson was the youngest champion in heavyweight history and he reigned in his prime years under Cus D'Amato . If someone puts him top 5 Heavyweight there's a reason for it right there. You can speculate the who's he beat but you could do that with just about any Heavyweight .Sounds like a made up thread to, but whatever .

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by larryxxx.. View Post
              I was at work and these guys have me rolling..Asked me do I think Wilder could beat Mayweather....Another told me Mike Tyson was top 5 boxer of all time...I asked him who the hell has he ever beaten and his reply"HE BEAT THE HELL OUT OF THAT WHITE GUY"...WHAT???

              That's why they are casuals.

              Comment


              • #37
                Problem for the self titled boxing experts on this forum is when it comes to scoring a fight often the casuals get it right and the "experts" are left wallowing in their biases.

                Comment


                • #38
                  But who was "the white guy"? Franz Botha? Peter McNeeley?

                  EDIT: Or maybe David "+1 for your win column" Jaco

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
                    Mike Tyson was the youngest champion in heavyweight history and he reigned in his prime years under Cus D'Amato . If someone puts him top 5 Heavyweight there's a reason for it right there. You can speculate the who's he beat but you could do that with just about any Heavyweight .Sounds like a made up thread to, but whatever .
                    Larry said top 5 boxer not top 5 heavyweight...One means u have an opinion the other makes u an idiot

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by KillaMane26 View Post
                      Larry said top 5 boxer not top 5 heavyweight...One means u have an opinion the other makes u an idiot
                      Ive seen Larrys posts and he doesn't consider Mike Tyson anything great in any weight class so who's the idiot again ? Clearly the thread was made up and he then had a way to take digs at fighters he doesn't like an idiot could see this. Ha

                      I don't really care its a forum full of idiots who are wilder fans who don't even want to see wilder fight AJ.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP