Compiled Media Scores for Wilder-Fury

[N/A]

What fighter and what piece?

Hahahaha. I'm not going to tell you who I am unless it's putting six figures in my pocket. Move on.

Surely if your view is completely dismissed, ridiculed and not believed then you do care.

Nope. Not at all. I post the truth. Whoever believes it is who believes it. Doesn't affect me.

fan boy who gave a ridiculous story of a shared account of boxing "myth busters" that all post in the exact same structure and style.

Only reason anybody found out there were multiple users is because people kept pointing out the different posting styles and asked if I had multiple personalities. So no, we don't use the exact same structure and style.

[Golden Boi 360]

Lemme guess, you had it 9-3 Fury ?

correct. 9-3 Fury.

[N/A]

correct. 9-3 Fury.

I had it 7-5 Fury, but I have no problem with 9-3. I scored the first four rounds 2-2, but could easily see 4-0 Fury or 4-0 Wilder depending on what you're looking for.

[Luilun]

Isn't Dan Rafel a cartoon character similar to Mr Magoo

[Phenom]

Draw was fair result boxing fans just love b1tching for the sake of b1tching

[The Big Dunn]

In fights involving a Golden Boy fighter, sure. But in a PBC fight with a foreign fighter in no way affiliated with BGP? Pointless. They have no agenda.

Yet you claimed dan Rafael did because he picked wilder as the winner. Gbp associated reporters have a bias against Haymon associated fighters. Their scores should be taken with a grain of salt.

Did lance score it for wilder based on race?

[OCPancho]

Isn't Dan Rafel a cartoon character similar to Mr Magoo

He's the one who put Country Harvest Buffet out of business in my city.

[TonyGe]

That's the problem with the guys giving Fury 10 rounds. He just didn't land very much. Slightly slightly more than Wilder, yes, but his punches weren't as damaging. It was impressive how much he made Wilder miss, but if you don't land anything of consequence, judges are often going to give the benefit of the doubt to the aggressor. Fury had some brilliant brilliant rounds. But there were also plenty of rounds with very little going on.

I wish I would have saved the link. A trainer was talking about scoring. He was saying that he taught how to block punches with slipping and using the gloves to parry. Problem was judges didnt get it. On the other hand West coast fighters were taught to throw a lot of punches in combination. The judges have a hard seeing what actually landed but give the fighter credit for some of the punches that didn't land. It's a real problem that put his fighters at a disadvantage.

I agree Fury had some great rounds but fights are scored on a round by round method. I think a lot of people got seduced by the Fury backstory and lost perspective.

[Fanofreason]

Fury backpedel all fight. Don't get points for running boys.
.

[Robbie Barrett]

Fury backpedel all fight. Don't get points for running boys.
.

This is just lies. The fight was fought mostly in the centre of the ring. Fury CIRCLED and pushed Wilder back just as often as Wilder forced him back. Fury controlled the fight. Wilder fought Fury's fight and at Fury's pace. That's called ring generalship and it's a scoring criteria.