Compiled Media Scores for Wilder-Fury

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • N/A
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2017
    • 9269
    • 214
    • 0
    • 12

    #81
    Originally posted by TonyGe
    I scored it by one point for Wilder. It wasn't a robbery it was an entertaining fight. Fury was throwing in combination but he missed a lot or they were blocked completely or partially. There were a few replays where they were trying to show some of Fury's punches and they clearly missed or were blocked. A draw was not outrageous.
    That's the problem with the guys giving Fury 10 rounds. He just didn't land very much. Slightly slightly more than Wilder, yes, but his punches weren't as damaging. It was impressive how much he made Wilder miss, but if you don't land anything of consequence, judges are often going to give the benefit of the doubt to the aggressor. Fury had some brilliant brilliant rounds. But there were also plenty of rounds with very little going on.

    Comment

    • N/A
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2017
      • 9269
      • 214
      • 0
      • 12

      #82
      Originally posted by chrisJS
      Will you be at tomorrow's fight? Or next Saturdays (since you "work for DAZN")?
      DAZN buys fights from me. I work with DAZN in that regard, but I don't work FOR them. If anything, they're my customer. I have no reason to be at any DAZN events I'm not promoting. And no, I won't be at the Loma fight. I have to be very very interested in a fight to bother getting on a plane, getting credentialed, etc. If the Wilder/Fury rematch takes place in the US, I'll probably be there. Still debating whether to make the trip for Pacquiao/Broner. Nothing else on the horizon I would care enough about.


      Can probably work something out there.
      No reason for us to meet. We can draw up contracts, have our funds held in escrow, and then I will supply my driver license and my credential from Wilder/Fury to show the names match, and your funds will be released to me. Or, I don't provide the proof, and my funds will be released to you. Very simple.


      I don't see why you'd be so scared of revealing your name. What's the worst that could happen?
      I'd severely damage and compromise numerous relationships in the industry if people knew I was running my mouth on BoxingScene. I should be compensated for the damage that would be done to my career.

      Comment

      • chrisJS
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 8989
        • 331
        • 64
        • 78,477

        #83
        Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
        DAZN buys fights from me. I work with DAZN in that regard, but I don't work FOR them. If anything, they're my customer. I have no reason to be at any DAZN events I'm not promoting. And no, I won't be at the Loma fight. I have to be very very interested in a fight to bother getting on a plane, getting credentialed, etc. If the Wilder/Fury rematch takes place in the US, I'll probably be there. Still debating whether to make the trip for Pacquiao/Broner. Nothing else on the horizon I would care enough about.




        No reason for us to meet. We can draw up contracts, have our funds held in escrow, and then I will supply my driver license and my credential from Wilder/Fury to show the names match, and your funds will be released to me. Or, I don't provide the proof, and my funds will be released to you. Very simple.




        I'd severely damage and compromise numerous relationships in the industry if people knew I was running my mouth on BoxingScene. I should be compensated for the damage that would be done to my career.
        So why did you go to Andrade's last fight against a nobody in nearby Boston? If you went to that due to DAZN, why not next week?

        You don't think "people in the industry" would put two and two together about who you are if you are close to them? Not sure why you wouldn't just post a couple press credentials in here since everybody thinks you're a liar. You say you are "paid to post here", well what's the harm? Why would you damage anything if you are paid to be here and talk? Who pays you out of curiosity? Surely if they are paying you they are happy to let people know or are they paying you to force an agenda? That agenda is questionable too because you are pro-PBC and anti-everything else yet you claim no affiliation with PBC.

        Also, when was the last time IBF and WBA logged in and what was their scorecard? Are they credentialed? Who pays them?

        You see how ridiculous your web of lies has made you look? There's a reason every thread you are being completely dismissed and ridiculed by just about everyone.

        Comment

        • jglvz256
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Sep 2016
          • 869
          • 44
          • 4
          • 19,603

          #84
          Originally posted by chrisJS
          So why did you go to Andrade's last fight against a nobody in nearby Boston? If you went to that due to DAZN, why not next week?

          You don't think "people in the industry" would put two and two together about who you are if you are close to them? Not sure why you wouldn't just post a couple press credentials in here since everybody thinks you're a liar. You say you are "paid to post here", well what's the harm? Why would you damage anything if you are paid to be here and talk? Who pays you out of curiosity? Surely if they are paying you they are happy to let people know or are they paying you to force an agenda? That agenda is questionable too because you are pro-PBC and anti-everything else yet you claim no affiliation with PBC.

          Also, when was the last time IBF and WBA logged in and what was their scorecard? Are they credentialed? Who pays them?

          You see how ridiculous your web of lies has made you look? There's a reason every thread you are being completely dismissed and ridiculed by just about everyone.
          I think either IBF or WBA is the one that is paid to "educate" ignorant posters but at this stage we really need a sticky at the top of the forum setting out all the personalities that use that account and what they do.

          Comment

          • N/A
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2017
            • 9269
            • 214
            • 0
            • 12

            #85
            Originally posted by chrisJS
            So why did you go to Andrade's last fight against a nobody in nearby Boston? If you went to that due to DAZN, why not next week?
            I had a piece of a fighter on that Boston card. Have no involvement with the MSG show and have no interest in that fight. No reason to make the trip.


            You don't think "people in the industry" would put two and two together about who you are if you are close to them?
            A few people have surely figured it out, but nobody that would run their mouth or cause trouble for me. It would be idiotic though for me to publicly confirm who I am. Especially when there's nothing in it for me.


            Not sure why you wouldn't just post a couple press credentials in here since everybody thinks you're a liar.
            Because I couldn't care less about whether people here believe me. I'm paid to correct mistakes, I do my job, I get paid. The goal here isn't to be believed, the goal is just to correct the false info.


            That agenda is questionable too because you are pro-PBC and anti-everything else yet you claim no affiliation with PBC.
            My professional opinion has consistently been that I believed PBC was heading in the right direction and would secure a paid network TV deal when the time buys ended. Everyone said I was crazy, but I was right.

            I wasn't saying all that stuff because I was "pro-PBC," I was saying it because that was my honest analysis. If I thought PBC was going to fail, I would have said that.

            I don't think DAZN's business model can work. I hope it does. They pay well. It doesn't make me anti-DAZN just because I think they'll ultimately fail. That's just my honest opinion.

            Comment

            • Real King Kong
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 12017
              • 454
              • 24
              • 105,905

              #86
              Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
              Then you should also remove all the people who work for Golden Boy.
              is fury with golden boy now?

              Comment

              • N/A
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2017
                • 9269
                • 214
                • 0
                • 12

                #87
                Originally posted by Real King Kong
                is fury with golden boy now?
                Wilder is with Haymon and Oscar hates Haymon.

                Ward & Kovalev weren't with Golden Boy, but it didn't stop them from stripping Stevenson. If it harms Haymon, Oscar is all for it.

                Comment

                • Real King Kong
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 12017
                  • 454
                  • 24
                  • 105,905

                  #88
                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                  Wilder is with Haymon and Oscar hates Haymon.

                  Ward & Kovalev weren't with Golden Boy, but it didn't stop them from stripping Stevenson. If it harms Haymon, Oscar is all for it.
                  well I guess there's no journalistic integrity left out there...everyone works for someone. I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying, but I'd like to think most boxing writers would rather score a fight honestly as opposed to looking like an idiot just to toe the company line...especially for scoring that doesn't really impact anything. the vast majority of time it's actual judges that turn in suspect cards, and that's a problem.

                  Comment

                  • chrisJS
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 8989
                    • 331
                    • 64
                    • 78,477

                    #89
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                    I had a piece of a fighter on that Boston card. Have no involvement with the MSG show and have no interest in that fight. No reason to make the trip.




                    A few people have surely figured it out, but nobody that would run their mouth or cause trouble for me. It would be idiotic though for me to publicly confirm who I am. Especially when there's nothing in it for me.




                    Because I couldn't care less about whether people here believe me. I'm paid to correct mistakes, I do my job, I get paid. The goal here isn't to be believed, the goal is just to correct the false info.




                    My professional opinion has consistently been that I believed PBC was heading in the right direction and would secure a paid network TV deal when the time buys ended. Everyone said I was crazy, but I was right.

                    I wasn't saying all that stuff because I was "pro-PBC," I was saying it because that was my honest analysis. If I thought PBC was going to fail, I would have said that.

                    I don't think DAZN's business model can work. I hope it does. They pay well. It doesn't make me anti-DAZN just because I think they'll ultimately fail. That's just my honest opinion.
                    What fighter and what piece?

                    Surely if your view is completely dismissed, ridiculed and not believed then you do care. Nobody is believing your "corrected info". Do the people paying you monitor you and say you are doing a good job? Surely they'd see your kind of an ongoing joke on this site and cut their losses? Showing who you are would add a ton of credence to what you say and wouldn't upset anyone. Quite the opposite as people would lend your ramblings some credibility rather than laugh at a guy who comes across as a fan boy who gave a ridiculous story of a shared account of boxing "myth busters" that all post in the exact same structure and style.

                    Comment

                    • N/A
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jul 2017
                      • 9269
                      • 214
                      • 0
                      • 12

                      #90
                      Originally posted by Real King Kong
                      well I guess there's no journalistic integrity left out there...everyone works for someone.
                      The problem is there's so little money in being a boxing reporter that you're almost forced to play favorites for perks.

                      Golden Boy owns Ring Magazine.

                      CBS Sports owns BoxingScene.

                      Top writers are hired to work as announcers or interviewers or podcasters, etc by DAZN, ESPN, PBC, etc.

                      Integrity is hard to find, or non-existent. Integrity leaves you bankrupt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP