Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wilder-Fury Draw Falls Within Scoring "Cone of Uncertainty"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Interesting concept, but f#ck it'd be a minor miracle if scorecards were only 2 rounds off this way or that way to be within the "cone of certainty". I think the problem that arises is there is often more than 2 rounds that could have went either way.

    When I've tracked close rounds on my scorecards that could have went either way there can be 3-6 of them on the regular. Thats problematic with determining whats a bad outcome or not.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by cally83 View Post
      95% of people had Fury winning and winning well. The few who didn't have no credentials or bias. Dan Rafael, an absolute mug, stealing a living, and Eli Suck ****, and maybe one or two more.
      Randomly does anyone know if Haymon finally brought off Fat Dan like HBO did of Hauser back in the day to shut him up cuz Fat Dan having Wilder win seems like a setup.

      Comment


      • #13
        The optics looked good for Wilder scoring the knockdowns, and a near knockout in the last round. Boxing though, is scored round by round. I think the point is that; although a draw is a conclusion you could reasonably come up with, according the boxing's scoring, Fury, more than Wilder, seemed like the winner. That is, despite nearly being knocked out.

        Comment


        • #14
          The optics looked good for Wilder scoring the knockdowns, and a near knockout in the last round. Boxing though, is scored round by round. I think the point is that; although a draw is a conclusion you could reasonably come up with, according to boxing's scoring, Fury, more than Wilder, seemed like the winner. That is, despite nearly being knocked out.

          Comment


          • #15
            The long and short of it is this. The judge who scored it for wilder gave him the first 5 rounds, which he clearly never won therefore that judge had been paid off . Simple no cone scoring or anything he got money and he gave wilder rounds the end!

            Comment


            • #16
              If Robert guerro or Carlos baldimir had of knocked Floyd down twice would they deserve draw?
              Let's face facts fury was robbed. You give rounds to wilder for looking like an amateur of course you can make a case for a draw. You could make a case for Nell beating Floyd also if you give rounds to Nell he didn't deserve.
              Last edited by hugh grant; 12-04-2018, 04:21 AM.

              Comment


              • #17
                Alejandro Rochin is incompetent and should be banned from judging boxing.

                Fury is a great champion and made one hell of a great comeback.

                Comment


                • #18
                  The card from Rochin in favour of Wilder was probably written from Thursday night. He needs to be on record and explain how he got to that score.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Wilder thinking he won because of the two KDs alone shows how limited he is as a pro. Fury gave him a boxing lesson and showed professionalism - even after getting robbed by Alejandro Rochin.

                    He took Klitschko's belts in Germany and should've had Wilder's belts in his own backyard.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Bumsquad !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP