Comments Thread For: Wilder-Fury Draw Falls Within Scoring "Cone of Uncertainty"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eff Pandas
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 52129
    • 3,624
    • 2,147
    • 1,635,919

    #11
    Interesting concept, but f#ck it'd be a minor miracle if scorecards were only 2 rounds off this way or that way to be within the "cone of certainty". I think the problem that arises is there is often more than 2 rounds that could have went either way.

    When I've tracked close rounds on my scorecards that could have went either way there can be 3-6 of them on the regular. Thats problematic with determining whats a bad outcome or not.

    Comment

    • Eff Pandas
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 52129
      • 3,624
      • 2,147
      • 1,635,919

      #12
      Originally posted by cally83
      95% of people had Fury winning and winning well. The few who didn't have no credentials or bias. Dan Rafael, an absolute mug, stealing a living, and Eli Suck ****, and maybe one or two more.
      Randomly does anyone know if Haymon finally brought off Fat Dan like HBO did of Hauser back in the day to shut him up cuz Fat Dan having Wilder win seems like a setup.

      Comment

      • Liondw
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2010
        • 5996
        • 1,873
        • 34
        • 23,904

        #13
        The optics looked good for Wilder scoring the knockdowns, and a near knockout in the last round. Boxing though, is scored round by round. I think the point is that; although a draw is a conclusion you could reasonably come up with, according the boxing's scoring, Fury, more than Wilder, seemed like the winner. That is, despite nearly being knocked out.

        Comment

        • Liondw
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2010
          • 5996
          • 1,873
          • 34
          • 23,904

          #14
          The optics looked good for Wilder scoring the knockdowns, and a near knockout in the last round. Boxing though, is scored round by round. I think the point is that; although a draw is a conclusion you could reasonably come up with, according to boxing's scoring, Fury, more than Wilder, seemed like the winner. That is, despite nearly being knocked out.

          Comment

          • trippers1
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 574
            • 40
            • 8
            • 18,869

            #15
            The long and short of it is this. The judge who scored it for wilder gave him the first 5 rounds, which he clearly never won therefore that judge had been paid off . Simple no cone scoring or anything he got money and he gave wilder rounds the end!

            Comment

            • hugh grant
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 30400
              • 2,179
              • 877
              • 105,596

              #16
              If Robert guerro or Carlos baldimir had of knocked Floyd down twice would they deserve draw?
              Let's face facts fury was robbed. You give rounds to wilder for looking like an amateur of course you can make a case for a draw. You could make a case for Nell beating Floyd also if you give rounds to Nell he didn't deserve.
              Last edited by hugh grant; 12-04-2018, 04:21 AM.

              Comment

              • Main Source
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 1434
                • 117
                • 56
                • 10,758

                #17
                Alejandro Rochin is incompetent and should be banned from judging boxing.

                Fury is a great champion and made one hell of a great comeback.

                Comment

                • P4Pdunny
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2017
                  • 8097
                  • 144
                  • 142
                  • 58,715

                  #18
                  The card from Rochin in favour of Wilder was probably written from Thursday night. He needs to be on record and explain how he got to that score.

                  Comment

                  • Main Source
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 1434
                    • 117
                    • 56
                    • 10,758

                    #19
                    Wilder thinking he won because of the two KDs alone shows how limited he is as a pro. Fury gave him a boxing lesson and showed professionalism - even after getting robbed by Alejandro Rochin.

                    He took Klitschko's belts in Germany and should've had Wilder's belts in his own backyard.

                    Comment

                    • vitali1999
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 4696
                      • 230
                      • 43
                      • 33,565

                      #20
                      Bumsquad !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP