Comments Thread For: Fury's Promoter, British Board To File Complaint With WBC
Collapse
-
-
What if he had scored it 113-113? Then we have a majority draw. Same result. So Haymon paid for a draw?
For once I want to see folks predict this judge corruption and ineptitude BY SPECIFIC JUDGE when the judges are announced. That way its saves them from just attacking the judge that didn't score the fight the same way they did.Comment
-
If the fight has a fighter one judge up before the ****ing bell, that's cheating and unfair. You don't have a problem with that? ****** ****.What if he had scored it 113-113? Then we have a majority draw. Same result. So Haymon paid for a draw?
For once I want to see folks predict this judge corruption and ineptitude BY SPECIFIC JUDGE when the judges are announced. That way its saves them from just attacking the judge that didn't score the fight the same way they did.Comment
-
Now you're just being emotional and irrational. Eat a Snickers or something.
Two judges felt Fury didn't win. Were both bought? It's just like with Alvarez and Golovkin. Who buys a draw? How did so many press scorecards have Wilder winning or a draw.Comment
-
I can pass the one giving 113-113 as being incompetent. There's just no way anyone could have seen Wilder win 7 rounds in that fight. He gave him the first 4 FFS. Blatant corruption. You should be embarrassed not defending it.Comment
-
-
It's great that they are doing this but we all know they won't do **** about it...the corruption is too deep.Comment
-
-
I didn't defend anything. I just challenged your corruption theory. Further, you call Edwards incompetent because his card differed from Tapper by ONE round. Tapper scored the fight for Fury and wrote on his card that the rounds were close!Comment
Comment