Comments Thread For: Fury's Promoter, British Board To File Complaint With WBC

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Butch.McRae
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2015
    • 4187
    • 153
    • 80
    • 22,548

    #21
    People calling robbery have no idea how fights are scored. Any unbiased/mature boxing viewer knew those cards were going to be all over the place. And they were.

    I had it 113-113 but I felt it could've went to either guy by a round or two. Why? Because there was not enough definitive rounds.

    1-4 were completely subjective, which usually means all hell will break loose at the decision without a KO. And that's exactly what happened. Grow up people.

    Comment

    • Butch.McRae
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2015
      • 4187
      • 153
      • 80
      • 22,548

      #22
      Originally posted by JWHardin
      This. I've seen more questionable judging and refs in the UK than anywhere in recent years. Sour g****s.
      I agree completely. It's funny how narrow they approach the sport. Lee Wylie is one of the few over there who keeps it square.

      Comment

      • diarraisagod
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Nov 2012
        • 768
        • 160
        • 77
        • 11,467

        #23
        Amazing how often these ridiculous scores come up in the big fights from the (alleged) top judges

        Which always necessitates a bigger, more lucrative rematch

        I wonder why it keeps happening.... $$$$$$$$$

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43872
          • 4,743
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #24
          Originally posted by Butch.McRae
          People calling robbery have no idea how fights are scored. Any unbiased/mature boxing viewer knew those cards were going to be all over the place. And they were.

          I had it 113-113 but I felt it could've went to either guy by a round or two. Why? Because there was not enough definitive rounds.

          1-4 were completely subjective, which usually means all hell will break loose at the decision without a KO. And that's exactly what happened. Grow up people.
          all rounds are subjective. like round 6 which the draw judge gave to wilder. its all subjective who knows????

          Comment

          • Butch.McRae
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2015
            • 4187
            • 153
            • 80
            • 22,548

            #25
            Originally posted by diarraisagod
            Amazing how often these ridiculous scores come up in the big fights from the (alleged) top judges

            Which always necessitates a bigger, more lucrative rematch

            I wonder why it keeps happening.... $$$$$$$$$
            There's an interesting video of the ref's reaction to the knockdown floating around the web.

            I'm not a conspiracy theorists but I think it's worth a look. He legitimately steps away, turns and looks to someone, then proceeds to jump on the ground before he starts the count.

            It's an interesting video. The Joshua glove tape incident and the Wilder cut check are other examples of strange happenings in the ring.

            Comment

            • BeLikeWater
              Undisputed Champion
              • Nov 2018
              • 1495
              • 93
              • 47
              • 26,566

              #26
              Maybe they should file a a complaint over fury's ped result after the klitchsko fight.

              Comment

              • Butch.McRae
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2015
                • 4187
                • 153
                • 80
                • 22,548

                #27
                Originally posted by daggum
                all rounds are subjective. like round 6 which the draw judge gave to wilder. its all subjective who knows????
                Lol fair enough

                My point is that people acting like somebody dominated those early rounds, are clearly biased

                Comment

                • Dreamking
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Dec 2015
                  • 818
                  • 185
                  • 84
                  • 13,110

                  #28
                  The only rounds I could possibly see for Wilder are the 7th, 9th and 12th. Fury won every other round. So 115-111 for Fury.

                  Comment

                  • dibzvincent143
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 5343
                    • 359
                    • 204
                    • 52,527

                    #29
                    Originally posted by marvin douglas
                    Just let it go. Complaints and protests never go anywhere and it makes you look like a sore loser. Just let it go and focus on the future.
                    Lol easy for you to say as you don’t work your ass off to get the victory. Millions of fans around the globe agrees with him and that makes him a sore loser? You might need to recalibrate your brain.

                    Comment

                    • BeLikeWater
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • Nov 2018
                      • 1495
                      • 93
                      • 47
                      • 26,566

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Butch.McRae
                      People calling robbery have no idea how fights are scored. Any unbiased/mature boxing viewer knew those cards were going to be all over the place. And they were.

                      I had it 113-113 but I felt it could've went to either guy by a round or two. Why? Because there was not enough definitive rounds.

                      1-4 were completely subjective, which usually means all hell will break loose at the decision without a KO. And that's exactly what happened. Grow up people.
                      Very well said, the fight needed more definitive rounds.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP