Wow. The punch stats reveal a much closer fight, round-by-round,
than most observers care to agree with. Fury landed at a higher %
but he threw less punches per round, and only out-landed Wilder by
2 or 3 punches per round. People need to rethink calling it a blatant
robbery.
Jesus, this is what we've come to, judging fights the day after according to b.s. "punchstats." Watch the damn fight and you will see clear as day that Fury got screwed.
Wow. The punch stats reveal a much closer fight, round-by-round,
than most observers care to agree with. Fury landed at a higher %
but he threw less punches per round, and only out-landed Wilder by
2 or 3 punches per round. People need to rethink calling it a blatant
robbery.
2 or 3 punches in a fight where hardly more than 10 punches were ever landed is a lot you dip****
2 or 3 punches in a fight where hardly more than 10 punches were ever landed is a lot you dip****
Wilder fans desperately trying to save face.
No, it's not. There's not a universe where a 13 punch differential is a significant difference over the course of 12 rounds.
What it means is that most every round was left in the hands of the judges because neither guy landed enough to clearly win the round. That's what happens when no one is connecting with the leather. If you don't like the judging, don't leave it in the hands of the judges.
This wasn't a Paq vs Bradley decision where one guy out-lands another by 100 punches and loses. This was a decision where either guy landed much, except the guy who looked marginally better doing it happened to land on his ass twice. That's why a draw was the right decision - neither guy deserved to win.
No, it's not. There's not a universe where a 13 punch differential is a significant difference over the course of 12 rounds.
What it means is that most every round was left in the hands of the judges because neither guy landed enough to clearly win the round. That's what happens when no one is connecting with the leather. If you don't like the judging, don't leave it in the hands of the judges.
This wasn't a Paq vs Bradley decision where one guy out-lands another by 100 punches and loses. This was a decision where either guy landed much, except the guy who looked marginally better doing it happened to land on his ass twice. That's why a draw was the right decision - neither guy deserved to win.
Yeah, OK, Wilder fan boy... keep telling yourself that. Your boy got outboxed and outclassed. Wilder landed about 3 clean punches the entire fight. So punch total doesn't make clear which shots landed cleanly. Fury was landing clean shots and nice jabs. Wilder wasn't landing squat.
Yeah, OK, Wilder fan boy... keep telling yourself that. Your boy got outboxed and outclassed. Wilder landed about 3 clean punches the entire fight. So punch total doesn't make clear which shots landed cleanly. Wilder was landing clean shots and nice jabs. Wilder wasn't landing squat.
Bye bye now.
How's he my boy? I've already said neither guy deserved to win and I've said Fury would probably win a rematch. But saying a draw is the right decision somehow puts me in camp Wilder? That's some interesting logic there.
By the way, check your post. You said Wilder was landing clean shots and nice jabs. But that wouldn't be true either way. Neither fighter was landing much of anything. The fight was a dud. A lot of posing, a lot of prancing but not a lot of fighting.
Compubox is just human being pushing buttons with the possible results being close to accurate, not so close to accurate or just down-right fraud, So, I take compubox with a grain of salt.
Comment