Originally posted by Lemonhead_Jeff
View Post
1. People are listening to the announcers and aren't closely watching the fight. If the announcers are biased then they think something is happening in the ring that clearly isn't.
2. They have their favorite and only see what they want to see.
3. They don't understand boxing scoring. Almost everyone who thinks Fury won talks about defense and ring generalship. Defense is only important if it leads to offense much like aggression is only rewarded when it's effective. Ring generalship isn't very important when neither guy is connecting. With, on average, 13 punches a round connecting, trying to figure out who has the cleaner, harder shots is going to come down to only 1 or 2 punches a round.
With so little to separate the fighters in any given round, it's no small wonder that the scoring was difficult and came out the way it did.
I do find it highly ironic though that some of the biggest complainers are the same ones who thought Kovalev got robbed in much the same manner against Ward. Kovalev had a couple big rounds and Ward won his by ever so slight margins in others and they claimed Kovalev won the fight. Wilder had a couple of big rounds and Fury won his by ever so slight margins and they claim Fury won the fight. Can't have it both ways, folks.
Comment