The issue here is 10-8 scoring not judging

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ruedboy
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 4164
    • 386
    • 381
    • 101,745

    #11
    The issue is the fact that judging a fight is a totally subjective thing. Even though there are criteria for the judges to follow, in effect a judge can score a fight any way they want, with no explanation of their decision.
    In addition, you have the fact that the promoter usually brings the ref and three judges to the fight three or four days ahead of time and comps them for all expenses in effect giving them a paid vacation.
    This results in a situation where the only fair result in boxing is the KO, where the fighter takes the result out of the judges' hands.

    Comment

    • _Rexy_
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2018
      • 27929
      • 6,140
      • 3,585
      • 358,040

      #12
      Originally posted by Eff Pandas
      Scoring in general needs to be reworked, but yea I could see this being one of the ways its reworked although I think there is far more problematic issues with scoring then KD's are causing. For example the fact 10-10 rounds are discouraged & a closely won round & a widely w/o being dominant round are both 10-9. Thats ******ed.
      Thats what's always bothered me. no tie rounds, so you can give a 10-9 over the smallest difference, then the next round the other guy dominates, and on the cards it's a tie fight.

      Comment

      • slimshandy69
        I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 3642
        • 323
        • 3
        • 16,514

        #13
        Originally posted by ruedboy
        The issue is the fact that judging a fight is a totally subjective thing. Even though there are criteria for the judges to follow, in effect a judge can score a fight any way they want, with no explanation of their decision.
        In addition, you have the fact that the promoter usually brings the ref and three judges to the fight three or four days ahead of time and comps them for all expenses in effect giving them a paid vacation.
        This results in a situation where the only fair result in boxing is the KO, where the fighter takes the result out of the judges' hands.
        Judges should definitely have notes on why they scored how they did. So it can be scrutinized more.

        Comment

        • D4thincarnation
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 16198
          • 533
          • 260
          • 133,240

          #14
          That's an issue with the judging.

          If a fighter comeback like that and was winning the round before the KD, they can score it 10-9 or even 10-10.



          As with Pacquiao vs Mosley, where the ref called a knockdown.

          Comment

          • Amber_TKO
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Oct 2018
            • 145
            • 26
            • 14
            • 7,579

            #15
            I don't think there's a problem with the scoring system, the problem is with the judges implementing it correctly. There's nothing to stop judges from scoring 10-10 rounds, but usually they don't. There's nothing to stop judges from not automatically scoring a knockdown round 10-8, but usually they don't. I could go on but maybe we need to educate judges on the scoring system better?

            Comment

            • Kezzer
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2017
              • 3480
              • 116
              • 35
              • 58,969

              #16
              I think 10 8 is fair, everyone knows how it is scored. It wasn’t that which decided it, the judge who had wilder winning first 5 rounds?? That was the decider

              Comment

              • _Rexy_
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2018
                • 27929
                • 6,140
                • 3,585
                • 358,040

                #17
                Originally posted by D4thincarnation
                That's an issue with the judging.

                If a fighter comeback like that and was winning the round before the KD, they can score it 10-9 or even 10-10.



                As with Pacquiao vs Mosley, where the ref called a knockdown.
                that's incredibly rare though, and saved for when a guy gets off the canvas to dominate after.

                Comment

                • jglvz256
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Sep 2016
                  • 869
                  • 44
                  • 4
                  • 19,603

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Amber_TKO
                  I don't think there's a problem with the scoring system, the problem is with the judges implementing it correctly. There's nothing to stop judges from scoring 10-10 rounds, but usually they don't. There's nothing to stop judges from not automatically scoring a knockdown round 10-8, but usually they don't. I could go on but maybe we need to educate judges on the scoring system better?
                  Or maybe the new rule in UFC now where only close rounds are 10-9 and a judge can give 10-8 or 10-7 for a dominant round. Just 1 point every time for winning a no-kd round doesn't give much flexibility.

                  Comment

                  • Eff Pandas
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2012
                    • 52129
                    • 3,624
                    • 2,147
                    • 1,635,919

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Amber_TKO
                    There's nothing to stop judges from scoring 10-10 rounds, but usually they don't.
                    Thats not true. Various commissions consider it bad judging to score rounds even.

                    Comment

                    • billeau2
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2012
                      • 27641
                      • 6,397
                      • 14,933
                      • 339,839

                      #20
                      Originally posted by slimshandy69
                      I've lost bets here on Kovalev Ward, ggg Canelo 2 and now this.

                      Although the Mexican judge was poor, I do not hate on the draw as he had to give a 10 8 round twice. Si 2 more rounds and its a draw. The issue here is that a lot of 10 8 rounds should be 10 9.

                      Take round 9in this fight and take Round 5 in Joshua Klitscko. Both rounds were 10 9 as the fighters that got knocked down actually dominate the round.

                      Should they look into knockdown scoring alot more and stop giving 10 8 like confetti.

                      Thoughts
                      Two comments:

                      Great point Green K worthy!

                      Unfortunately when it comes to judging issues? It is like getting stabbed in the throat bleeding out, and finding a great treatment for the cut to the arm...

                      This is about moneyed interests, the lines can't lose in Vegas any more, too much cash involved. It is corruption.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP