Comments Thread For: Adrien Broner is Risky Business For Manny Pacquiao

[P4Pdunny]

I got Pac winning this wide, Broner doesn't do near enough to win the rounds.

[Mzembe]

and the best crawford has fought is horn?

--------------------------

Crawford does not claim to be an all time great. Nobody on this forum even says that.
You and all Filipinos all believe PAC is the greatest so can you answer a simple logical question ...
Were Algieri or David Diaz or Mathysse or Rios or Horn the best opponent available for PAC?

[Hatesrats]

AB is a tough fight for anyone, Manny is just waaaaaaaaay to busy for Broner's style.
Doubt Pacquiao will KO Broner unless a ref jumps in while Manny is throwing & AB is in a shell not throwing back... but spark out!!! Cant see that. (Anything can happen doe)

I expect Pax to win a wide 12rd UD (but competitive... if that makes sense)

[BritishBoxing92]

By Michael Rosenthal - Manny Pacquiao's decision to fight Adrien Broner on January 19 was sound, but make no mistake: It's risky. Pacquiao, who turns 40 on December 17, wants to make as much money as possible before the aging process forces him to hang up his gloves. That's why the ultimate fight for him is a rematch with Floyd Mayweather, which would provide one last windfall in his remarkable career. However, as we know, there are no guarantees that a second fight with his rival will ever happen. In the meantime...
[Click Here To Read More]

meh we will see what unfolds come fight night who knows Pac-Man might outbox Broner in the mid to later rounds? Broner will move around as he does and will try to take the fight to Pacquiao in order to try secure the victory..

[pasawayako]

--------------------------

Crawford does not claim to be an all time great. Nobody on this forum even says that.
You and all Filipinos all believe PAC is the greatest so can you answer a simple logical question ...
Were Algieri or David Diaz or Mathysse or Rios or Horn the best opponent available for PAC?

Lol. crawford has not fought a single elite opponent but you already calling him the best lb4lb. Pac achievements and resume speak for himself and no one can deny it except the haters.

[pasawayako]

--------------------------

Crawford does not claim to be an all time great. Nobody on this forum even says that.
You and all Filipinos all believe PAC is the greatest so can you answer a simple logical question ...
Were Algieri or David Diaz or Mathysse or Rios or Horn the best opponent available for PAC?

Lol. crawford has not fought a single elite opponent but you already calling him the best lb4lb. Pac achievements and resume speak for himself and no one can deny it except the haters.

[boxinggod101]

--------------------------

Crawford does not claim to be an all time great. Nobody on this forum even says that.
You and all Filipinos all believe PAC is the greatest so can you answer a simple logical question ...
Were Algieri or David Diaz or Mathysse or Rios or Horn the best opponent available for PAC?

Pac is not the greatesr... still an atg... wheter you like it or not. Always make me laugh whennpeolle try to dissect an atg resume. All of them had ****ty fight... Cant compare Crawford and Manny resume, right?

[Mzembe]

Lol. crawford has not fought a single elite opponent but you already calling him the best lb4lb. Pac achievements and resume speak for himself and no one can deny it except the haters.

--------------------------------

I have never said Crawford is the best p4p anywhere on any of my posts but because you don't speak English well I understand how you can be mistaken.
Crawford is crap so I agree with you.

Now that we've addressed that, can you address the quality of PAC's opponents in Algieri, David Diaz, Algieri, Horn, Mathysse, Horn or even Broner?

Very simple English for you to understand i hope.

[Mzembe]

Pac is not the greatesr... still an atg... wheter you like it or not. Always make me laugh whennpeolle try to dissect an atg resume. All of them had ****ty fight... Cant compare Crawford and Manny resume, right?

===================

Crawford resume is ****ty, we all agree on that.
PAC is an ATG, fine. Now can you explain or justify an ATG fighting Rios or Mathysse or Horn or Diaz or Broner or Algieri. Can you address that point without mentioning other boxers for comparisons. We are talking about an ATG Manny here

Unless English is not your first language

[boxinggod101]

===================

Crawford resume is ****ty, we all agree on that.
PAC is an ATG, fine. Now can you explain or justify an ATG fighting Rios or Mathysse or Horn or Diaz or Broner or Algieri. Can you address that point without mentioning other boxers for comparisons. We are talking about an ATG Manny here

Unless English is not your first language

Well we can compare to other ATG.... Or you just want to sh**t on Manny resume? We can go all your ATG list 1 by 1 and make a fool out of yourself. You think after 70 pro fights hes supposed to have fought other ATG in every fight.

Log off man. You sound like a pure dummy