Comments Thread For: Fury: If I Fought Wilder In Manchester, We'd Sell 75,000 Tickets

[Laligalaliga]

Why should Wilder get more than Parker?

Lets look at the logic here

Joshua 2 belts parker 1

Joshua beats parker

Joshua 3 belts wilder 1

Why should wilder benefit financially from another mans work?

it makes zero sense, Wilder should actually get 25% less than Parker got logically

Joshua has 75% of the belts and brings like 80+ of the revenue

I say 75-25 split in Joshuas favour, anything above that is overly generous to wilder

Absolutely... Absolutely.
You have a functional brain.

[Laligalaliga]

when (the NEW) Team Bullshlt make Wilder a reasonable offer (32.5% minimum), you can get back to me..... until that happens..... Joshua - and you fangirls - are full-of-shlt

Am sure you have seen this. Only a ****** will object.

Why should Wilder get more than Parker?

Lets look at the logic here

Joshua 2 belts parker 1

Joshua beats parker

Joshua 3 belts wilder 1

Why should wilder benefit financially from another mans work?

it makes zero sense, Wilder should actually get 25% less than Parker got logically

Joshua has 75% of the belts and brings like 80+ of the revenue

I say 75-25 split in Joshuas favour, anything above that is overly generous to wilder

Use your brain bro.

[aboutfkntime]

Am sure you have seen this. Only a ****** will object.

Why should Wilder get more than Parker?

Lets look at the logic here

Joshua 2 belts parker 1

Joshua beats parker

Joshua 3 belts wilder 1

Why should wilder benefit financially from another mans work?

it makes zero sense, Wilder should actually get 25% less than Parker got logically

Joshua has 75% of the belts and brings like 80+ of the revenue

I say 75-25 split in Joshuas favour, anything above that is overly generous to wilder

Use your brain bro.

the purse is decided by how much revenue a fighter will generate, not by belts LMAO..... you fanboys are burning out that excuse real fast

casual fans are parrots, repeaters of rubbish..... which one of you wally's invented that one?

never heard that one used before now

so, yea..... nice logic there

Wilder > Parker in EVERY department

he is much more well-known than Parker..... much more well-established..... and MUCH more dangerous

they offered Parker 32.5% because they wanted to fight him

they offered Wilder 15% because..... ?

I will let you answer that question

is this where you argue that Parker was a bigger draw than Wilder?

[Robbie Barrett]

the purse is decided by how much revenue a fighter will generate, not by belts LMAO..... you fanboys are burning out that excuse real fast

casual fans are parrots, repeaters of rubbish..... which one of you wally's invented that one?

never heard that one used before now

so, yea..... nice logic there

Wilder > Parker in EVERY department

he is much more well-known than Parker..... much more well-established..... and MUCH more dangerous

they offered Parker 32.5% because they wanted to fight him

they offered Wilder 15% because..... ?

I will let you answer that question

is this where you argue that Parker was a bigger draw than Wilder?

If the purse is decided by how much revenue is generated then what Parker made is irrelevant. Purses aren't decided on what a fighters opponents made.

[aboutfkntime]

If the purse is decided by how much revenue is generated then what Parker made is irrelevant. Purses aren't decided on what a fighters opponents made.

of course they are

Team AJ thought Parker was worth 32.5%... because, they actually wanted to fight him

Team AJ offered Wilder 15%... because, they do not want to fight him

want proof..... ?

how is it possible to consider 15mil fair, when Hearn let it slip and admitted that Wilder deserves at least 35% ?..... just like I said

" At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair "
https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-if...-50-50--133005

like I said..... any reasonable man should admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%..... and Hearn just admitted that himself

[Robbie Barrett]

of course they are

Team AJ thought Parker was worth 32.5%... because, they actually wanted to fight him

Team AJ offered Wilder 15%... because, they do not want to fight him

want proof..... ?

how is it possible to consider 15mil fair, when Hearn let it slip and admitted that Wilder deserves at least 35% ?..... just like I said

" At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair "
https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-if...-50-50--133005

like I said..... any reasonable man should admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%..... and Hearn just admitted that himself

You've just said purses are decided on how much revenue you generate. Now you're flip flopping.

[aboutfkntime]

..... any reasonable man should admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%..... Hearn just admitted that himself

how could that not be true..... ?

Wilder > Parker..... in EVERY department.....

..... so, how can that point not be true..... ? LMAO

#excuses
#realweakexcuses

[aboutfkntime]

You've just said purses are decided on how much revenue you generate. Now you're flip flopping.

FACT: Wilder > Parker..... in EVERY department.....

FACT: Parker was worth 32.5%

FACT: Hearn just admitted that Wilder is worth 35%
https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-if...-50-50--133005

FACT: any reasonable man should admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%..... like Hearn just admitted


let me know which one you don't agree with

[Robbie Barrett]

FACT: Wilder > Parker..... in EVERY department.....

FACT: Parker was worth 32.5%

FACT: Hearn just admitted that Wilder is worth 35%
https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-if...-50-50--133005

FACT: any reasonable man should admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%..... like Hearn just admitted


let me know which one you don't agree with

Those are opinions.

Parker got paid 6.5 mil, Wilder got offered more than twice that.


Make up your mind. Is purse decided by what revenue a fighter generates or what a past opponent received? You damn Wilder fans always flip flopping.

[aboutfkntime]

Those are opinions.

no Robbie, they are not opinions..... they are facts

FACT: Wilder > Parker..... in EVERY department.....
..... if you disagree, then name that department

FACT: Hearn thought that Parker was worth 32.5%.....
..... which is why he paid him 32.5%.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-ai...y-2018--123843

FACT: Hearn DID just admit that Wilder is worth 35%.....
..... and here is the link to prove it.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-if...-50-50--133005

based on those three facts, this becomes a fact.....

FACT: any reasonable man would admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%, like Hearn just admitted

Parker got paid 6.5 mil, Wilder got offered more than twice that.

BOLLOCKS !!

he got 32.5%.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-ai...y-2018--123843

"Parker, on the other hand, is guaranteed £13m from the bout - significantly more than Joshua's previous opponent".....
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/boxing/2...h-fight-purse/

Martin got 6mil, NOT Parker

Make up your mind. Is purse decided by what revenue a fighter generates or what a past opponent received? You damn Wilder fans always flip flopping.

it is obviously the same thing.....

they paid Parker 32.5%, because that is what they felt he was worth..... based on what they felt he could generate

common-sense dictates that the BETTER man, the more well-known man, the more established man, Wilder..... deserves more, just like Hearn admitted