-
-
Am sure you have seen this. Only a ****** will object.
Why should Wilder get more than Parker?
Lets look at the logic here
Joshua 2 belts parker 1
Joshua beats parker
Joshua 3 belts wilder 1
Why should wilder benefit financially from another mans work?
it makes zero sense, Wilder should actually get 25% less than Parker got logically
Joshua has 75% of the belts and brings like 80+ of the revenue
I say 75-25 split in Joshuas favour, anything above that is overly generous to wilder
Use your brain bro.Comment
-
the purse is decided by how much revenue a fighter will generate, not by belts LMAO..... you fanboys are burning out that excuse real fast
casual fans are parrots, repeaters of rubbish..... which one of you wally's invented that one?
never heard that one used before now
so, yea..... nice logic there
Wilder > Parker in EVERY department
he is much more well-known than Parker..... much more well-established..... and MUCH more dangerous
they offered Parker 32.5% because they wanted to fight him
they offered Wilder 15% because..... ?
I will let you answer that question
is this where you argue that Parker was a bigger draw than Wilder?
Comment
-
If the purse is decided by how much revenue is generated then what Parker made is irrelevant. Purses aren't decided on what a fighters opponents made.the purse is decided by how much revenue a fighter will generate, not by belts LMAO..... you fanboys are burning out that excuse real fast
casual fans are parrots, repeaters of rubbish..... which one of you wally's invented that one?
never heard that one used before now
so, yea..... nice logic there
Wilder > Parker in EVERY department
he is much more well-known than Parker..... much more well-established..... and MUCH more dangerous
they offered Parker 32.5% because they wanted to fight him
they offered Wilder 15% because..... ?
I will let you answer that question
is this where you argue that Parker was a bigger draw than Wilder?
Comment
-
of course they are
Team AJ thought Parker was worth 32.5%... because, they actually wanted to fight him
Team AJ offered Wilder 15%... because, they do not want to fight him
want proof..... ?
how is it possible to consider 15mil fair, when Hearn let it slip and admitted that Wilder deserves at least 35% ?..... just like I said
" At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair "
like I said..... any reasonable man should admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%..... and Hearn just admitted that himselfComment
-
You've just said purses are decided on how much revenue you generate. Now you're flip flopping.of course they are
Team AJ thought Parker was worth 32.5%... because, they actually wanted to fight him
Team AJ offered Wilder 15%... because, they do not want to fight him
want proof..... ?
how is it possible to consider 15mil fair, when Hearn let it slip and admitted that Wilder deserves at least 35% ?..... just like I said
" At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair "
like I said..... any reasonable man should admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%..... and Hearn just admitted that himself
Comment
-
..... any reasonable man should admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%..... Hearn just admitted that himself
how could that not be true..... ?
Wilder > Parker..... in EVERY department.....
..... so, how can that point not be true..... ? LMAO
#excuses
#realweakexcusesComment
-
FACT: Wilder > Parker..... in EVERY department.....
FACT: Parker was worth 32.5%
FACT: Hearn just admitted that Wilder is worth 35%
FACT: any reasonable man should admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%..... like Hearn just admitted
let me know which one you don't agree withComment
-
Those are opinions.FACT: Wilder > Parker..... in EVERY department.....
FACT: Parker was worth 32.5%
FACT: Hearn just admitted that Wilder is worth 35%
FACT: any reasonable man should admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%..... like Hearn just admitted
let me know which one you don't agree with
Parker got paid 6.5 mil, Wilder got offered more than twice that.
Make up your mind. Is purse decided by what revenue a fighter generates or what a past opponent received? You damn Wilder fans always flip flopping.Comment
-
no Robbie, they are not opinions..... they are facts
FACT: Wilder > Parker..... in EVERY department.....
..... if you disagree, then name that department
FACT: Hearn thought that Parker was worth 32.5%.....
..... which is why he paid him 32.5%.....
FACT: Hearn DID just admit that Wilder is worth 35%.....
..... and here is the link to prove it.....
based on those three facts, this becomes a fact.....
FACT: any reasonable man would admit, that the negotiation for Wilder STARTS at whatever they paid Parker..... which was 32.5%, like Hearn just admitted
BOLLOCKS !!Parker got paid 6.5 mil, Wilder got offered more than twice that.
he got 32.5%.....
"Parker, on the other hand, is guaranteed £13m from the bout - significantly more than Joshua's previous opponent".....
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/boxing/2...h-fight-purse/
Martin got 6mil, NOT Parker
Make up your mind. Is purse decided by what revenue a fighter generates or what a past opponent received? You damn Wilder fans always flip flopping.
it is obviously the same thing.....
they paid Parker 32.5%, because that is what they felt he was worth..... based on what they felt he could generate
common-sense dictates that the BETTER man, the more well-known man, the more established man, Wilder..... deserves more, just like Hearn admittedComment
Tweet
Comment