Comments Thread For: Linares: Canelo is Best Pound-For-Pound Fighter in The World

[P4Pdunny]

Goes to show what you know about boxing.

You back caping again.

[Jab jab boom]

It wasn't controversial, the media MADE it controversial with the help of 97k g-tards….LMMFAO!

actually it's only canelotards like yourself who think it was a clear win. If you lose on 95% of press row scores and get the official decision by winning a 12th round that you pretty much clearly lost, it's controversial.

[j.razor]

I don't think you're an objective poster.

Lions only though, brah!!!

I call it how it is. I'm not bias, racist, paid or a person that "Don't Know Shet Bout Boxing."

Lions Only have proved me wrong a couple of times so now I ride with them. I aint ******....Real Recognize Real.

[Illmatic94]

my #1 is Usyk. in this sport of shady scores and robberies he continues to rack up big wins on enemy territory. undisputed and cleaned out a tough CW division.

Canelo beat GGG but he has yet to establish clear separation. that fight could've went to Golovkin and i would have no problem with that.

but its funny how the same ppl who call Golovkin overrated and a bum say Canelo is #1 for beating him. makes no sense. if you beat a bum you actually drop in rankings or stay put. you don't climb up.

with that said I don't wanna see a third fight with Canelo and Golovkin. 160 is deep and i want other guys to get a shot at them.

[Jab jab boom]

No its not cuz proof is on video you dumb ass blind lying ******.

are you really this ******? You saying Canelo deserved to win vs lara and ggg twice is your opinion and many don't agree with it. As a matter of fact, the entire p4p list is based on opinion and not fact. Most don't think Canelo is #1 p4p, many don't have him in the top 4 or 5. You love him more than you love your mother, so to you, he's #1, 2,3,4,5 p4p which is your opinion. However, Him being #1 in your heart, is your truth and a fact.

[Mammoth]

You got Mammoth's list....LMMFAO!

He has good taste

[factsarenice]

He BEAT Lara & Triple L TWICE (not from my opinion but from what I saw).

Razer and stump can't resist pushing the Golden Boy narrative.

[j.razor]

actually it's only canelotards like yourself who think it was a clear win. If you lose on 95% of press row scores and get the official decision by winning a 12th round that you pretty much clearly lost, it's controversial.

I was going for Lara when Nelo beat him but Nelo DID BEAT him. Triple L is fake as you can get that got BEAT by Jacobs AND Nelo TWICE. Tell Triple b1TCH TO prove SOMETHING like fighting Jermall Charlo but NAH he TOO pvssy! Goes to show. And that "press row" were g-tards….LMMFAO!

[Mammoth]

my #1 is Usyk. in this sport of shady scores and robberies he continues to rack up big wins on enemy territory. undisputed and cleaned out a tough CW division.

Canelo beat GGG but he has yet to establish clear separation. that fight could've went to Golovkin and i would have no problem with that.

but its funny how the same ppl who call Golovkin overrated and a bum say Canelo is #1 for beating him. makes no sense. if you beat a bum you actually drop in rankings or stay put. you don't climb up.

with that said I don't wanna see a third fight with Canelo and Golovkin. 160 is deep and i want other guys to get a shot at them.

Golovkin was supposed to suck soooooo much and him and Canelo are about the same level.

[factsarenice]

In reality Canelo isn't top 5 and Linares lost respect by making a ****** comment like that.