Anyone who has Canelo ahead of Loma, Usyk or Crawford needs their head inspected.
Nah, you are just bias probably. Nelo has the BETTER resume AND lost to T.B.E. while l0m0 has less than 13 fights AND LOST to a fighter that had 12 losses
You cant argue that Salido beat Loma. And you do know Linares vs. Loma was almost dead even before the tko. Your also knocking a fighter who has gotten much, much better since then.
Salido did beat Loma. Lomachenko moved up to Lightweight and challenged a titleholder. It wasn't easy but he did what he had to win. Clearly.
So who is your top 5??? At least show your top 5 if your gonna hate.
Loma, Crawford, Usyk, Garcia, Inoue.
It's weird that I was one of the few here defending Canelo 6 months ago and now he wins (ANOTHER) controversial decision and people want to pretend he's godly.
It's a hate for Golovkin that's boosted Canelo. People really have to sell Canelo as this great fighter in order to savor that Golovkin loss.
You don't become #1 p4p by getting controversial decisions. And I don't care what anyone says, Canelo has at the very least 2 wins and a draw that are controversial. No other fighter that has ever been considered #1 p4p has achieved that status that way. You do it by winning fights and doing so convincingly.
Last edited by Jab jab boom; 11-12-2018, 01:15 PM.
Comment