Originally posted by whoseyourdaddy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Linares: Canelo is Best Pound-For-Pound Fighter in The World
Collapse
-
Originally posted by fvanesbeck View PostAnyone who has Canelo ahead of Loma, Usyk or Crawford needs their head inspected.
I personally have Usyk. I think what he does at his size is truly unique. Men that big with that kind of movement, output and skill you don't see often.
I think Loma and Spence are also uniquely talented. I am a bigger Crawford fan than either of those two but I just think he might be a level below.
Not much of a fan of the Spence-Garcia fight when the Loma-Garcia fight could be made first but oh well. This is boxing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fvanesbeck View PostAnyone who has Canelo ahead of Loma, Usyk or Crawford needs their head inspected.
I definitely think he should be ranked ahead of Usyk
even forgetting resume's
just based on who would win if all things were equal
based on skill/style/form.....
Lomachenko/Crawford
Canelo
Inoue/Garcia
then probably Usyk
but in this thread Canelo is the top guy
Linares said
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Postin the 36 rounds vs lara and ggg, Canelo only landed more punches in 11 of those rounds. But sure, it's fact that he deserved to win because some nut guzzling loser named j razor on an online forum says so. I can't believe that I'm explaining to what I assume is a grown man, the difference between fact and opinion.
punches ? .....
..... you mean, pitty-pat jabs..... right ?
sorry, they are not valid scoring criteria
not in the pro's anyway
and even in the am's, clean hard punching is rewarded/favored
Comment
-
Originally posted by whoseyourdaddy View PostGo look it up, google it, hell even the greatest Canelo hater in Malignaggi said that Canelo probably pull it of. But according to yourself 3 rounds won by Lara encompass the whole 12 round fight? what the hell did Lara do after the 3rd Round?
And this one regarding lara fight. https://youtu.be/1_EiEYZT0ww
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View PostYes, I have all three ahead of him. I have no problem with anyone who have those three at the top of their list.
I personally have Usyk. I think what he does at his size is truly unique. Men that big with that kind of movement, output and skill you don't see often.
I think Loma and Spence are also uniquely talented. I am a bigger Crawford fan than either of those two but I just think he might be a level below.
Not much of a fan of the Spence-Garcia fight when the Loma-Garcia fight could be made first but oh well. This is boxing.
it looks like someone has no idea what P4P means
and no stupid, I am not picking on you
I am just reacting to your fanboy comments
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postpunches ? .....
..... you mean, pitty-pat jabs..... right ?
sorry, they are not valid scoring criteria
not in the pro's anyway
and even in the am's, clean hard punching is rewarded/favored
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postnot sure I agree with Linares on that one
but for the arguments sake, that sounds pretty good to me today
Canelo is the best fighter in the world
which means... that Golovkin is not the best fighter in the world, right?
Now If we consider GGG not very good then I can see why some ppl have Canelo outside of P4P top 5 or even top 10. But ive yet to see anyone woth GGG ranked hight P4P right now...So im cool with that.
Comment
Comment