Lil g is the biggest coward known to mankind. let's hope Canelo,Jacobs ignore him

[chrisJS]

Stopped reading after the 1st sentence. I'm not gonna waste my time on someone who doesn't understand what a hyperbole is. Just keep being that guy who lists these old fighters to appear more knowledgeable than you actually are and keep being that guy who thinks the sport hasn't evolved for the better.

I confronted you with a FACT and you just ignored it by talking about these old fighters again. It's telling when you do that and try to defend a weirdo like "Boxing Logic" who tries to make everything about race.

LOL thanks for AGAIN confirming you are a casual and have never even heard of some well known all-time greats much less even seen them fight. LOL at advancing for the better too. You really think Berto is a better and more accomplished boxer than Jose Napoles, Eder Jofre or Carlos Monzon? Haha like a said a typical noobie fanboy. Pick up a book or even just go onto youtube. Boxing has a great history and your fanoyism is not allowing you to appreciate it.

What 1930's fighter did I mention again? You probably don't even know who Salvador Sanchez is and when he fought yet you profess to be above all fans.

[BillyBoxing]

The 1st 2 fights are not happening next and you know it. GGG hasn't said he wants to go to 168.SO the last 3 fights are not realistic.

He said he wants a 3rd Canelo fight. The easiest way to position yourself for that is beat Charlo and become the mando opponent for the WBC belt.

Why would you fight Saunders, a drug cheat with no title, over Charlo?

The best options available are either Andrade or Charlo, the 2 fights he seems most reluctant to make.

BJS is much more relevant at 160 than Charlo and Andrade both combined. He vacated his belt, he's unbeaten and more tested.

If he's irrelevant because he cheated, then so is your boy Clenelo, the man GGG is supposed to chase for a third fight with a CHarlo mando fight in your agenda.

See how you're not making any sense at all?

SO listen, we are not having a fair, reasonable discussion.

You're just a hater and your opinions became pointless to me.

Welcome to my ignore list.

Have a nice day.

[Bigblackted44]

I remember his fans killing Sergio Martinez with one leg for not fighting him. I remember them killing Billy Joe Saunders for not fighting him but then he signed the fight and they tuck tails waiting on Canelo. This dude was trying to get big pay days not make the best fights. He could have moved up to fight Ward on PPV after stating he would fight anybody between 154-168. Hes probably a HOF fighter but hes a liar just like most of these boxers.

[mcdonalds]

LOL thanks for AGAIN confirming you are a casual and have never even heard of some well known all-time greats much less even seen them fight. LOL at advancing for the better too. You really think Berto is a better and more accomplished boxer than Jose Napoles, Eder Jofre or Carlos Monzon? Haha like a said a typical noobie fanboy. Pick up a book or even just go onto youtube. Boxing has a great history and your fanoyism is not allowing you to appreciate it.

What 1930's fighter did I mention again? You probably don't even know who Salvador Sanchez is and when he fought yet you profess to be above all fans.

Here you are going off on tangents again, did you forget to take your meds today?

I presented "boxing logic" with a fact that Floyd fought the most Champions in boxing history (even if you only count the WBA and WBC) and has faced plenty of future HOF's. Which proves that his stance that he "ruined" boxing is a fcking joke. He also then decided to defend arum in the same post, which is just hilarious considering his history in preventing big fights, keeping fights in house and fcking over his own fighters. "boxing logic" also tried to blame everything on race which is a joke in itself.

You then replied talking about these old fighters even though it doesn't disprove anything that I said and you're only doing it to appear knowledgeable when it's not applicable to anything that i was arguing against

Step up your reading comprehension, it's truly embarrassing.

[TonyGe]

Stopped reading after the 1st sentence. I'm not gonna waste my time on someone who doesn't understand what a hyperbole is. Just keep being that guy who lists these old fighters to appear more knowledgeable than you actually are and keep being that guy who thinks the sport hasn't evolved for the better.

I confronted you with a FACT and you just ignored it by talking about these old fighters again. It's telling when you do that and try to defend a weirdo like "Boxing Logic" who tries to make everything about race.

Hold your horses. You're the guy who set the tone of the debate by saying in the "history of boxing". He's responding by giving you the history of boxing and now your complaining about old fighters.. Get real.

[mcdonalds]

Hold your horses. You're the guy who set the tone of the debate by saying in the "history of boxing". He's responding by giving you the history of boxing and now your complaining about old fighters.. Get real.

Floyd fighting the most champions in the history of boxing is an actual fact though. That guy is just going off on tangents because he has autisim. Get real

So wtf are you talking about??

[The Big Dunn]

BJS is much more relevant at 160 than Charlo and Andrade both combined. He vacated his belt, he's unbeaten and more tested.

If he's irrelevant because he cheated, then so is your boy Clenelo, the man GGG is supposed to chase for a third fight with a CHarlo mando fight in your agenda.

See how you're not making any sense at all?

SO listen, we are not having a fair, reasonable discussion.

You're just a hater and your opinions became pointless to me.

Welcome to my ignore list.

Have a nice day.

But Saunders isn't a champion, so why would GGG fight him? Where did I post he was irrelevant because he cheated?

So you lie about what I posted then run because GGG will not fight Charlo and I asked you to call him out for that same as you did the guys that didn't fight GGG?

OK, Just goes to show you what GGG fans are really like.

[chrisJS]

Hold your horses. You're the guy who set the tone of the debate by saying in the "history of boxing". He's responding by giving you the history of boxing and now your complaining about old fighters.. Get real.

LOL exactly. This clown claims to be above people who actually bothered to read about the history and has seen thousands of old fights with his knowledge and grasp of history simply by dismissing it with claims of someone else "wanting to appear knowledgeable", yet he claimed all of the fighters listed fought in the 1930's when none of them did like Napoles who fought in the 60's and 70s.

He started watching boxing around 2007/2008 and ignores everything prior to 1996 yet still tries to act like an authority on the sport and it's history. Typical fanboy who can't name half of the hall of fame and has probably seen only highlights of just a handful. I encounter these fake fans/fanboys all the time.

[TonyGe]

I remember his fans killing Sergio Martinez with one leg for not fighting him. I remember them killing Billy Joe Saunders for not fighting him but then he signed the fight and they tuck tails waiting on Canelo. This dude was trying to get big pay days not make the best fights. He could have moved up to fight Ward on PPV after stating he would fight anybody between 154-168. Hes probably a HOF fighter but hes a liar just like most of these boxers.

He didn't sign anything to my knowledge. Are your referring to the PR stunt Saunders pulled showing an email from Loffler as "signing a contract"

[TonyGe]

Floyd fighting the most champions in the history of boxing is an actual fact though. That guy is just going off on tangents because he has autisim. Get real

So wtf are you talking about??

What I am talking about is the history of boxing. You wanted it you got it so stop complaining that he's using it.