Comments Thread For: Roach Says a Prime Pacquiao 'Walks Through' Everyone at 147

[IceTrayDaGang]

This is where he just gets ******. His rationale is because Spence and Crawford haven't beaten a WW as good as Manny that they therefore can't beat this Manny even though he is small.

He forgets that the WW that was on the level of Spence and Crawford, Cotto, he had to fight at 145 because 147 might have been too much for Manny.

Wonder what happens if the promoter and trainer make it easier for Cotto instead of Manny?

and your reason as to why spence beat manny?

"he's bigger".. see how ****** you sound? LOL!!!

[IceTrayDaGang]

This is where he just gets ******. His rationale is because Spence and Crawford haven't beaten a WW as good as Manny that they therefore can't beat this Manny even though he is small.

He forgets that the WW that was on the level of Spence and Crawford, Cotto, he had to fight at 145 because 147 might have been too much for Manny.

Wonder what happens if the promoter and trainer make it easier for Cotto instead of Manny?

and you forget (actually you choose to ignored it) that those guys were still levels above one eye handicap brook. which is spence's best win at 147. LOL!

[Quiksilva]

Without an issue, only ones who gives him problems is Floyd and Spence!

I think Crawford is up there too. I underestimated Bud but the guy can fight man.

[The Big Dunn]

and you forget (actually you choose to ignored it) that those guys were still levels above one eye handicap brook. which is spence's best win at 147. LOL!

Not when they fought Manny they weren't. In their primes, ODH was. Clottey no.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Not when they fought Manny they weren't. In their primes, ODH was. Clottey no.

when they fought manny, yes, they were better than the version of brook that fought spence. the handicap drained version.

[The Big Dunn]

and your reason as to why spence beat manny?

"he's bigger".. see how ****** you sound? LOL!!!

That isn't my reason. Spence is bigger, more powerful, a better boxer. He combines that with speed and athleticism. Added to that he has a 5 inch reach advantage that allows him to fight from the outside and utilize a jab that neutralizes Manny's power and speed. Crawford doesn't have Spence's power but he has the speed added with all the other attributes.

They are both very strong counterpunchers with high IQ's.

[The Big Dunn]

when they fought manny, yes, they were better than the version of brook that fought spence. the handicap drained version.

This is where you lose all credibility. Crawford and Spence are 2 of the top 7 fighters in the world. Clottey and ODh were not that. Thurman , when healthy is consensus 10-15. ODH nor Clottey was that when they fought Manny.

Cotto was a top p4p fighter. He surely wasn't #1 like Crawford.

[IceTrayDaGang]

That isn't my reason. Spence is bigger, more powerful, a better boxer. He combines that with speed and athleticism. Added to that he has a 5 inch reach advantage that allows him to fight from the outside and utilize a jab that neutralizes Manny's power and speed. Crawford doesn't have Spence's power but he has the speed added with all the other attributes.

They are both very strong counterpunchers with high IQ's.

once again. "assuming"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

you have nothing to back that up but your opinion!!

that's like me saying, pac is faster, quicker hands, faster feet, so he beat spence because brook was tagging spence early on when they fought and brook is nowhere near pac in speed. see what i did there?

im actually bringing up fighters that manny has fought and won with similar traits as to what you listed for spence!!

[IceTrayDaGang]

This is where you lose all credibility. Crawford and Spence are 2 of the top 7 fighters in the world. Clottey and ODh were not that. Thurman , when healthy is consensus 10-15. ODH nor Clottey was that when they fought Manny.

Cotto was a top p4p fighter. He surely wasn't #1 like Crawford.

this is where you lose all credibility. who did they beat? watch you come back and say that dont matter, lmao!!! how they the best fighter in the world then?

[IceTrayDaGang]

That isn't my reason. Spence is bigger, more powerful, a better boxer. He combines that with speed and athleticism. Added to that he has a 5 inch reach advantage that allows him to fight from the outside and utilize a jab that neutralizes Manny's power and speed. Crawford doesn't have Spence's power but he has the speed added with all the other attributes.

They are both very strong counterpunchers with high IQ's.

who did they fought again for you to make that assumption? when you have c-d level guys of course you gon look good. remember what yall say bout GGG? LOL!